FDA claims on COVID-19 vaccine safety are unsupported by reliable data - and could severely hinder vaccine access
FDA claims on COVID-19 vaccine safety are unsupported by reliable data and could severely hinder vaccine access
Published: December 3, 2025 4:16pm EST
Frank Han
Assistant Professor of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Illinois Chicago
(The Conversation) The Food and Drug Administration is seeking to drastically change procedures for testing vaccine safety and approving vaccines, based on unproven claims that mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines caused the death of at least 10 children.
....(snip)....
Citing an internal, unpublished review, the memo, written by the agencys top vaccine regulator, Vinay Prasad, attributes the childrens deaths to myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle. And it says the deaths were reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS, but provides no evidence that the vaccines caused the deaths.
The death of children due to an unsafe vaccine is a serious allegation. I am a pediatric cardiologist who has studied the link between COVID-19 vaccines and heart-related side effects such as myocarditis in children. To my knowledge, studies to date have shown such side effects are rare, and severe outcomes even more so. However, I am open to new evidence that could change my mind.
But without sufficient justification and solid evidence, restricting access to an approved vaccine and changing well-established procedures for testing vaccines would carry serious consequences. These moves would limit access for patients, create roadblocks for companies and worsen distrust in vaccines and public health. ....................(more)
https://theconversation.com/fda-claims-on-covid-19-vaccine-safety-are-unsupported-by-reliable-data-and-could-severely-hinder-vaccine-access-271028
Lovie777
(21,352 posts)NewHendoLib
(61,502 posts)Who actually benefits from plastering the world with bullshit like this?
Ferrets are Cool
(22,485 posts)Response to Ferrets are Cool (Reply #3)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Hey Joe
(339 posts)rank incompetence on the American people and government.
If we ever recover from this onslaught of greed and corruption, it will take years and many deaths to do it.
Come on midterm elections!
Baitball Blogger
(51,571 posts)So, how many babies have died from the measles because they were unvaccinated?
MustLoveBeagles
(14,243 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(173,596 posts)In a brutal week for public health, the chairman on the Senate health committee could act. So why doesnt he?
As Trump hires another ballroom architect for his White House vanity project, a question hangs overhead: Will he ever devote this much attention to governing and policymaking?
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-12-05T14:04:30.667Z
I think we know the answer. www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/gops-bill-cassidy-criticizes-kennedys-vaccine-panel-but-the-senator-isnt-prepared-to-act
Without data to support their decision and defying warnings from doctors, medical associations and public health groups, a federal advisory panel stocked with loyalists to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has voted to stop recommending a life-saving vaccine to infants at birth.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will stop recommending the hepatitis B birth dose for infants specifically those born to mothers who test negative for the virus until theyre at least 2 months old, following a vote on Friday morning by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Eight panel members voted to stop the recommendation, with three dissenting.
....Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, a former physician who chairs the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which has oversight of the Department of Health and Human Services, has raised related concerns. The day before the vote, the senator said online, The ACIP is totally discredited. They are not protecting children.
A day later, Cassidy published a follow-up online statement:
Link to tweet
.....The latter half of the quote, however, wasnt quite right. Cassidy, in a position of real power and influence on Capitol Hill, has plenty of other options. He could concede publicly that confirming Kennedy was a tragic mistake; he could call for Kennedys resignation; he could even schedule hearings and haul officials from HHS, CDC and the FDA to Capitol Hill to demand answers and changes.
Cassidy isnt doing any of these things. Hes instead publishing a couple of tweets, criticizing radical and dangerous public health moves in the mildest of ways.
I cant ready the senators mind. Maybe hes worried about the GOP primary challenge hes facing in Louisiana next year? Maybe hes letting partisan considerations hold him back? Maybe hes under pressure from Republican leaders not to do anything more consequential?
Whatever his motivation, Cassidy cant escape responsibility for the damage Kennedy and his cohorts are doing to the nations public health, and while he could take meaningful actions in response, the senator is choosing not to, seemingly indifferent to the consequences of his inaction.
Skittles
(168,908 posts)Last edited Sat Dec 6, 2025, 06:02 AM - Edit history (1)
I understand RFK Jr is a fucking nutcase who has hired even more fucking nutcases but WHAT is the incentive for THE ENTIRE GOP to go along with something that could easily negatively affect THEM AND THEIR FAMILIES?????