Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(135,750 posts)
Sun Apr 2, 2023, 02:06 PM Apr 2023

The natural gas pushback

Gunnison, Colorado, at 7,700 feet above sea level, sees some of the coldest temperatures in the Lower 48. Its 6,000 or so inhabitants, especially low-income residents in older, poorly insulated housing, use more energy — often from natural gas — than their lowland counterparts.

Last year, Gunnison’s city government proposed cutting both greenhouse gas emissions and utility bills by making new homes more efficient and less reliant on fossil fuels.

But Gunnison soon encountered the same obstacle that other communities do when they try to move toward electric heat pumps, stoves and water heaters: natural gas providers.

By vigorously campaigning against electrification policies in what are normally local battles, national natural gas utilities have opened a new front in the decarbonization struggle: building codes.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/the-natural-gas-pushback/ar-AA19nwOX

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The natural gas pushback (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2023 OP
Here in California, our Gov & Legislature are trying to mandate a shift to electricity, but... NullTuples Apr 2023 #1
Oiligarchs play dirty orthoclad Apr 2023 #2

NullTuples

(6,017 posts)
1. Here in California, our Gov & Legislature are trying to mandate a shift to electricity, but...
Sun Apr 2, 2023, 02:55 PM
Apr 2023

We mandated that all new homes must have rooftop solar.

So the Public Utilities Commission ruled the buyback rate for power that is so low, the panels won't pay for themselves before they wear out.

We declared that new construction must phase out gas. People started converting their existing homes, too.

PG&E has to protect their shareholder returns, so they're not spending on increasing their ability to approve & install upgraded service panels, etc..

Oh, and did I mention that electricity rates in most areas of California - as set by the aforementioned PUC - is $0.35 - $0.40 per Kilowatt/hour? PG&E customers pay about 80% more per kilowatt-hour than the national average, according to UC Berkeley’s Haas Business School & the nonprofit think tank Next 10.

And no matter what judges rule against PG&E for siphoning revenue off for investors, the cost simply gets passed on to customers.

It's like we're making it easy for gas producers to push back & we're supposed to be one of the so-called climate leader states.

orthoclad

(4,728 posts)
2. Oiligarchs play dirty
Sun Apr 2, 2023, 06:49 PM
Apr 2023

We have to expect this.

The fossil rich want to wring every penny out while they still can, disasters be damned.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The natural gas pushback