Exclusive: Woman who dated Graham Platner says he sexually assaulted her
Source: Politico
A woman who dated Maine U.S. Senate candidate Graham Platner says he forced her to have sex with him nearly five years ago despite her repeated objections, an allegation Platner denies.
The woman, a 41-year-old Maine resident named Jenny Racicot, detailed the alleged incident to POLITICO in three interviews over the past two weeks. POLITICO also spoke with a man Racicot dated and confided in the years after the alleged incident, and reviewed documents, including emails between Racicot and her therapist and messages between Racicot and an acquaintance whom she warned against getting involved with Platner years before he ran for office.
Racicot said she had an on-and-off relationship with Platner, who is now the Democratic Senate nominee in Maine, for more than two years before he entered her rural Maine home uninvited one night in late 2021, deeply intoxicated, and forced himself on her while she repeatedly told him to stop. She said she cut off contact with him after telling him the encounter was not consensual.
I remember him grabbing my pelvis and being really forceful of me, she said. I remember the specific moment where I thought to myself, like, This is no longer my choice.
Platner denied the allegations.
These allegations are troubling, serious, and false. Any accusation of non-consensual behavior is categorically untrue, he said in a statement.
Racicot previously described reckless and unsettling behavior by Platner to The New York Times, but says she didnt go public with the specific assault claim because she didnt want to be known as a rape victim.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/06/graham-platner-sexual-assault-allegation-00987737
Marie Marie
(11,659 posts)If true - he deserves accountability. If not true, then once again the GOP will succeed in smearing and cheating their way into another win. Either way, Susan may benefit from his dirt rather than her record.
Vinca
(54,620 posts)obamanut2012
(29,726 posts)Scandals from this dude.
pat_k
(14,627 posts)My opinion doesn't matter, but I'd be a hell of a lot happier if they picked David Costello over Mills. I just don't see people getting excited about Mills. Costello was gaining ground when the first NYT reports dropped. There just wasn't enough time before the primary for people to take a closer look at him.
awesomerwb1
(5,192 posts)2naSalit
(105,161 posts)But I recall almost being tombstoned before the primary for not wanting to vote for him citing these exact issues. But I was castigated for "purity testing" this guy, which I was not.
So don't blame me that everyone else was head over heals for a the guy, I was not and this is exactly why.
Shiny new object makes many leave the sensible choices behind.
drray23
(8,866 posts)I am not a Mainer but we spend at least one month every year there. We have dear friends in Rockport and often do the trip from Virginia to stay there. Maine is dear to my heart, I love the people, the food and the environment. I am only familiar with coastal maine.
2naSalit
(105,161 posts)Ont the coast, moved away in my early teens. Came back last year, now in the north woods and loving it. Coming home wasn't all that hard after all.
I voted in Maine for the first time this year and I was hoping for Mills to take the nomination. She is the only state-wide elected candidate who has won more than once. She said that all the 'novices' who had run against collins in the past lost to her.
If what's his name stays in, we'll see collins win again.
Blasphemer
(3,646 posts)2naSalit
(105,161 posts)four within and hour. But that was then, this now and time for his fans to reflect on their enthusiasm for him. I feel vindicated, not happy about it but there it is.
Chasstev365
(8,445 posts)Blasphemer
(3,646 posts)The article says, "She told Politico she hesitated to make her claim public because she had a 'huge moral conflict' between supporting Platners politics and not supporting him as a person."
I can understand being hopeful about a primary outcome that would avoid having to go public.
CousinIT
(12,930 posts)Not sure what now.
What is certain is that Democrats will likely not take over the US Senate. I HOPE I'M WRONG!
drray23
(8,866 posts)It was pretty obvious that something like this would emerge as soon as he is the nominee.
Now, I don't judge whether or not it is true or a manufactured accusation like some will not doubt claim, the fact is , it was an obvious vulnerability.
I do tend to believe women in cases like this and from what is being described, the reporters did gather a number of corroboration.
Whether its an attempt to smear Platner or not, its going to significantly alter the race.
That's why you don't run newcomers with zero experience and a past with problematic behavior even if they are young and say the right things.
Raven123
(8,075 posts)I cant help but wonder how this has just emerged. Has the media been calling her after her initial comments? There is a lot about this that is unsettling.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,792 posts)They are scared to death of him. Unless there is actual unmitigated proof, ignore and move on.
sarisataka
(23,118 posts)or just conditional?
2naSalit
(105,161 posts)It's conditional, same as it ever was.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,792 posts)sarisataka
(23,118 posts)"Unless there is actual unmitigated proof, ignore and move on"
ignore and move on sounds like the decision has been made.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,792 posts)So until it has......Democrats are playing into the hands of the Fascists if they fold the tent as a "precaution". Grow a damn spine! Ignore and move on.
yardwork
(70,132 posts)sheshe2
(99,149 posts)Escape
(565 posts)Plattner will have to become a Republican.
hlthe2b
(115,353 posts)on that MSNOW panel when it was announced as breaking news, I would have been sorely pressed not to pop her. Uggh. She automatically convicted him, concluded he should never have been considered as a candidate, and within seconds of this breaking news, has all but sentenced him. For everyone else just trying to absorb the story and collect their thoughts, it should have been a jarring kneejerk reaction. It was certainly ugly as hell to me, even though I will express some similar thoughts here now. The difference is that I'm willing to think through the accusation, the story, the evidence where possible, and the implications over some time. That she would not is just disgusting.
So, again, I have admittedly had bad feelings about Platner from the first, but given the RW identity of his early (main) accuser and his clear past issues with temper and alcohol, it was at least conceivable this was not the campaign-ending type of accusation it appeared at first glance.
So, now a more specific accusation. I don't know all the full details, but her complaint appears quite plausible and she does not appear to be politically motivated--at least on first glance. What I don't like about her accusations are the timing, some of the details of the incident that at least COULD be less than clear in terms of unquestionable (fully nonconsensual sex) and thus rape, and as with many of these incidents that no action was taken to formalize or ensure that police investigate/prosecute based on the accusations, a difficulty in establishing facts. There can be many reasonable explanations for not doing so and I acknowledge that does not disprove anything. She has indicated there are some contemporaneous discussions with one or more around her at the time. That is certainly important.
So, here we are. Where I thought we probably were months ago and worried that we would be soon thereafter.
I am a feminist and I believe strongly in empowering women to take action and be supported when sexual assault (or repeated harassment)) occurs. But, I don't automatically suggest that these incidents are always credible or verifiable. Women can and do lie too, but in this case, I fear that may not be the case. Alcohol has been a repeated issue in his past. So, too his inability to control his anger and intentions. The two can be a really dangerous combination.
I am as upset as any with this news. But even 90 minutes later, I still want to tear into Molly Jong Fast for her on-air immediate reaction.