Judge rejects legal effort to cancel White House's UFC event
Source: ABC
The White House can host an Ultimate Fighting Championship event on the South Lawn this weekend, a federal judge ruled on Friday.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta rejected a request to block the high-profile event brought by two Virginia residents who alleged the Trump administration's authorization for the event was unlawful.
In his order, Judge Mehta determined that the plaintiffs failed "to establish both a substantial likelihood of standing and irreparable harm" in their lawsuit against the event.
The lawsuit alleged the event -- which includes a press conference at the Lincoln Memorial on Friday, ceremonial weigh-in and concert at the Ellipse on Saturday, and the South Lawn fight on Sunday -- violated National Park Service regulations, was improperly permitted, and lacked a necessary environmental review.
In his order, Judge Mehta found neither plaintiff was able to show they are "directly affected" by the event, despite their contentions that the temporary arena known as the "Claw" is "hideous" and "grotesque," and that it diminishes their ability to enjoy the beauty of the nation's capital in the coming days.
Read more: https://abcnews.com/US/judge-rejects-legal-effort-cancel-white-houses-ufc/story
The judge found no standing. This is not a surprise
Link to tweet
BumRushDaShow
(172,982 posts)The Friday dump!
mahatmakanejeeves
(71,351 posts)BumRushDaShow
(172,982 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(11,517 posts)dweller
(28,825 posts)to the court of appeals pronto
✌🏻
Igel
(37,656 posts)The judge explained the basis, and appointed by Obama I doubt he's a hard-core Trumper.
Making it impossible to enjoy the view would make anybody able to stop anything they thought unpleasant. Don't like that protest permit? Hey, it impairs the view.
Don't like having traffic re-routed briefly? So much for that parade.
(Provided it's a federal issue and not a state issue, but then again maybe a lot of the 'argumentation' would percolate on down.)
pat_k
(14,304 posts)Talitha
(8,177 posts)And take lard-ass with it.
Hopefully it will be unbearably hot and miserable.
Let 'em all sit and stew in their own juice for a few hours.
wcollar
(216 posts)
BettyBlueDot
(35 posts)My disgust is that he is using OUR property for personal profit. Without authorization. He may as well just come to my house, erect his "cage" on my front lawn, and collect his grift..... and I would hv no say????? I thought there were laws against using Federal property for personal gain.
Bengus81
(10,473 posts)Never mind Covid was everywhere by then too.
onenote
(46,304 posts)Bengus81
(10,473 posts)Have those billionaire buds of Trumps plunked down their millions for a seat as instructed?