A Jan. 6 rioter doesn't want Trump's pardon. Supreme Court weighs in.
Source: USA Today
Updated March 9, 2026, 1:05 p.m. ET
WASHINGTON − A presidential pardon? No thanks, said Glenn Brooks, who was convicted for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. He would rather try to clear his name through the courts than accept a pardon from President Donald Trump.
The Supreme Court on March 9 declined to give Brooks a chance to do that. Lower courts had canceled Brooks conviction for entering the Capitol and dismissed his appeal as no longer relevant after Trump last year pardoned nearly 1,600 people charged in the 2021 riot.
But Brooks, a home remodeling contractor and a "deeply religious man," argued he has the right to try to fully exonerate himself. "A forced pardon operates as a compelled confession, branding the individual with guilt and stripping him of his chosen appellate forum," Brooks lawyers told the Supreme Court.
His lawyers also said the issue is "of profound national importance given the increased use of presidential pardons in politically sensitive cases." The Department of Justice waived its right to respond to Brooks' Supreme Court appeal.
Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/03/09/supreme-court-jan-6-rioter-reject-trump-pardon/88985097007/
Link to SCOTUS DOCKET - Glenn Allen Brooks, Petitioner v. United States
AZ8theist
(7,256 posts)BumRushDaShow
(168,649 posts)GB_RN
(3,549 posts)If by standards you mean, all Cantaloupe Caligula the Corpulent flags in their front yards: their battle standard; and if by principles you mean theyre saying, I aint got no principals (sic)
I quit school.
Yeah, I can go along with that. 😁
The Wizard
(13,686 posts)is confessing guilt.
SomewhereInTheMiddle
(649 posts)... while decrying both his past actions and his apparent idiocy in arguing that entering a government building though a broken window along with hundreds of armed rioters was a "normal" thing because he "worked construction".
"I didn't know that bashing through a line of police trying to keep us out of the building and entering protected property through a destroyed window could possibly be a crime."
"At least I'm never admitting it was. And I'm sure I'll eventually convince some judge somewhere that I'm right."
wolfie001
(7,538 posts)Trashiest people on the planet.