Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ificandream

(11,653 posts)
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 01:09 PM Saturday

Bill Clinton Responds To Epstein Files Swimming Pool Photos

Source: Newsweek

By Sam Stevenson
Associate News Editor

A spokesman for Bill Clinton has responded to the latest Epstein Files release, accusing Donald Trump of scapegoating the former Democratic President. Newsweek has reached out to the Clinton Foundation via a contact form on its website for comment.

(snip)

Clinton appears prominently in a batch of undated and heavily redacted photographs, including images of him at a swimming pool alongside Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

(snip)

Clinton's chief of staff, Angel Urea, issued a statement addressing the former president's appearance in the files. He said: "This is not about Bill Clinton. Even [White House chief of staff] Susie Wiles said Donald Trump was wrong about Bill Clinton." He added: "Everyone, especially MAGA, expects answers, not scapegoats."

The Justice Department stated it found no evidence to predicate further investigations against uncharged public figures, including Clinton, and noted the extensive use of redactions to protect victims' privacy. Despite this, the prominence of Clinton in the released photographs drew public and media attention. By contrast, Trump appeared in just a few images and was not featured as extensively in the initial release.

Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/bill-clinton-responds-epstein-files-swimming-pool-photos-11248241



Clinton spokesman statement posted on Twitter.


16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

FredGarvin

(782 posts)
1. Bill Clinton didnt respond
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 02:02 PM
Saturday

He used a spokesman to do so for him.

Apparently too busy to speak for himself?

Smart on Bill's part.

Festivito

(13,839 posts)
13. It is best to have spokespersons read and submit everything.
Mon Dec 22, 2025, 06:49 PM
22 hrs ago

All it takes is a bad spell check for big trouble.

ToxMarz

(2,727 posts)
2. I don't have any idea whether Clinton has ever done anything criminally to young women or engaged in sex trafficking
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 02:29 PM
Saturday

But Clinton was President in the 1990's, Epstein was still cutting his teeth at this point. There was no Epstein Island at this point. Once Clinton became President and everyday since until he is gone, everything he does is very highly scrutinzed, he is under 24/7 Secret Service detail. Even if he wanted to do these things, it would be VERY difficult for him to pull off discreetly. He isn't stupid a person, and even if he wanted/needed to have affairs and rendezous, he wouldn't need an Epstein to facilitate it, and wouldn't be so careless to pursue them in that manner. He has to have learned to be exceedingly careful in eveything he does due to the relentless persecution of the right.

jaymac

(189 posts)
8. oaky, I may be wrong
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 07:26 PM
Saturday

but weren't the women who accused and told on Bill Clinton women over childhood age?.....did not look it up but his Liaisons were of the big hair, southern type 20's/30's and not children.

ToxMarz

(2,727 posts)
9. Not just the ages of the women, but the timeline
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 09:27 PM
Saturday

They were from before he was ever President. That's my point. After he was elected President, even if he was behaving badly, with the intense scrutiny and constant Secret Service presence how could he have been realistically deeply involved with what Epstein was doing without leaving and easily followed trail, even if he wanted to. And Epstein's sex trafficking wasn't in high gear until after Clinton was elected.

I doubt the Secret Service would allow him to go off with some unknown teen girl for a private massage without an FBI Background check first.

BOSSHOG

(44,596 posts)
6. Subject Photos - More Proof
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 03:55 PM
Saturday

That Donald trump is a chickenshit spineless container of conservative values. HES THE LEADER OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. REPUBLICANS LOVE HIM. Convicted felon, serial lying moral degenerate and he is the superstar of the grand old party and their precious values. And chickenshit John roberts says we shouldn’t hold him accountable.

IbogaProject

(5,561 posts)
7. Bill just traveled with JE a few times on actual Philanthropic missions
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 06:05 PM
Saturday

T47 only went to Epstein Island and to Epstein's personal residences on top of procuring underage models for JE. Whereas Bill Clinton went on a few actual philanthropic missions before Mr E was charged in 2006.

malthaussen

(18,375 posts)
10. So, accessory after the fact?
Sun Dec 21, 2025, 12:32 PM
Sunday

Take the statement at face value, and Mr Clinton knew what Mr Epstein was doing -- and did nothing about it.

-- Mal

Festivito

(13,839 posts)
14. Rumors do not go an AG. Rumors suspicions are not knowing.
Mon Dec 22, 2025, 07:05 PM
22 hrs ago

One can request investigation. But you should have evidence for that as well.

malthaussen

(18,375 posts)
15. Reasonable point. But we're talking about an important politician here...
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 11:54 AM
5 hrs ago

...even if he was not as important at the time of the pics as he would later be. So it's possible he could have tried to use his influence to address the claims -- if he really cared.

The statement "cut him off before his crimes came to light" doesn't tell us why Mr Clinton chose to "cut off" Mr Epstein. It sounds to me like an attempt to distance while subconsciously admitting a closer connection. What does "come to light" mean in this context? Come to Mr Clinton's attention, or become a public scandal?

-- Mal

Oneironaut

(6,195 posts)
11. The "grainy 20-year-old photos" statement irks me.
Sun Dec 21, 2025, 06:43 PM
Sunday

I know not everyone will agree with this, but, Bill Clinton is seen in the photos being associated with probably the most notorious sex trafficker of the 21st century (or, slightly before that). I don't care how old the photos are, or, if Trump released them to try and deflect (which he most obviously did). The age of the photos and purpose of releasing them does not make them any better.

Why even say this, if not to try and minimize them? I find this statement insulting, to be honest.

"The first group of people knew nothing and cut Epstein off before his crimes came to light."

BULLSHIT

valleyrogue

(2,523 posts)
12. More "guilt by association" bullshit.
Sun Dec 21, 2025, 07:14 PM
Sunday

Bill Clinton didn't do anything with underage children. That is the end of the story.

To mention him is to take the heat off Epstein's best buddy, DJT.

Bengus81

(9,754 posts)
16. If Clinton is guilty of something more than raising money for charity and swimming
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 12:15 PM
4 hrs ago

then lets fucking see it. If he's guilty of a real crime then so be it. At the same time let's see everything about Trump instead of redacting shit.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bill Clinton Responds To ...