Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SomewhereInTheMiddle

(661 posts)
Tue Dec 16, 2025, 06:46 AM Dec 2025

I could honestly see why the Seret Service might be worried about a giant unsecured hole in the building ...

I could honestly see why the Seret Service might be worried about a giant unsecured hole in the building as a security threat. And I agree the administration should have thought about that before starting demolition. It is possible the SS did not have any say in the destruction.

But a ballroom cannot be the only solution to the security breach.

How about a nice concrete wall closing off the entrance to the rest of the White House? Or a concrete corridor/stair leading to the entrance to the Emergency Bunker. Those could be built quick and temporary while the ballroom plans get fully vetted to the extent of the law. I would think there would be some quick solution to the security breach that does not include a ### thousand square foot eyesore.

But what do I know?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»I could honestly see why ...