Melania Trump Could Face Deportation, Maxine Waters Suggests
Last edited Wed Mar 26, 2025, 10:54 AM - Edit history (1)
Source: Newsweek
Published Mar 26, 2025 at 5:27 AM EDT
Congresswoman Maxine Waters suggested that Donald Trump should consider deporting his wife, Melania Trump, while criticizing his administration's immigration policies.
Why It Matters
The president has vowed to remove millions of migrants without legal status from the United States as part of his mass deportation program.
What to Know
The California Democrat made the remarks about Melania Trump while expressing her opposition to cuts to federal programs by the president's adviser Elon Musk, who heads the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
"When he [Trump] talks about birthright, and he's going to undo the fact that the Constitution allows those who are born here, even if the parents are undocumented, they have a right to stay in America. If he wants to start looking so closely to find those who were born here and their parents were undocumented, maybe he ought to first look at Melania," Waters said at a rally in Los Angeles.
Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/melania-trump-deportation-maxine-waters-immigration-doge-cuts-2050557
(edit to fix link)

Omnipresent
(6,784 posts)
Irish_Dem
(66,909 posts)Did Melania lie on her visa like Musk?
Is she here illegally?
hadEnuf
(3,066 posts)No holds barred.
snowybirdie
(5,968 posts)He's an immigrant who entered this country under false premises. Used a student visa and never attended school.
raccoon
(31,728 posts)Bengus81
(8,427 posts)with illegals,there wouldn't be any.
twodogsbarking
(13,106 posts)TommieMommy
(1,718 posts)Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Post removed
Ms. Toad
(36,402 posts)And the link is to a reparations for rioters article.
As to Waters remarks, Melania's continued presence in the country has zero to do with birthright citizenship. She got here through a "genius" visa.
BumRushDaShow
(149,651 posts)I have the tabs for the news sites right next to each in my browser!
I have about 3 dozen news sites in tabs.
Ms. Toad
(36,402 posts)I've already got 20, and I just turned my computer on for the day.
BumRushDaShow
(149,651 posts)I have close to 450 tabs open in a window with "sections" for my weather monitoring/weather models, recipe stuff, gardening stuff, computer hardware stuff, and some miscellaneous DU stuff.
Ms. Toad
(36,402 posts)I usually only have one window open, and when the tabs get so small that I can't tell what's on them I clean house.
BumRushDaShow
(149,651 posts)But I do a lot of "hobby" researching and reading in between DU stuff. But that means I'm swinging back and forth along the row of tabs (I keep them in a single row versus the option to group them in multiple rows so I have a big enough window to read the pages).
I have my preferences modded so it looks closer to to the old-style Firefox "folder tabs" (I hate the plain square-top tabs) and the tabs scroll off the end of the row but I can go forward/back along that row to get to either end.
dickthegrouch
(3,961 posts)Use the task manager or process explorer to kill your browser before upgrading it.
The browser will tell you that it was terminated abruptly and ask if you want to restore your pages.
BumRushDaShow
(149,651 posts)it gives me the option to "Restore previous session" and all the tabs are there.
My "issue" was more with my saving certain "versions" of pages because a restore means the browser automatically grabs the latest version from the server when I click on the tab to see it's current view (although it refuses to grab the lateest when I do a regular "refresh", where it forces me to do a SHIFT-REFRESH to get the latest - I guess their way to speed stuff up
).
Cirsium
(2,137 posts)It is still too cold to start opening the windows.
Seriously, though, what a ridiculous comment by Waters and what a crap article.
BumRushDaShow
(149,651 posts)And at her age, she can say any damn thing she wants.
Cirsium
(2,137 posts)Agreed.
travelingthrulife
(1,899 posts)he should first look at his foreign-born wife's probably illegal entry into this country.
Ms. Toad
(36,402 posts)and to parents who were undocumented at the time their children were born in the US. Which has no application at all to Melania.
Absent more of what she said (which I followed the link to try to find . . . but it led elsewhere), what she said makes no logical sense.
travelingthrulife
(1,899 posts)Cirsium
(2,137 posts)"If he wants to start looking so closely to find those who were born here and their parents were undocumented, maybe he ought to first look at Melania."
Melania was not born here to undocumented parents.
FBaggins
(28,055 posts)She wasn’t “born here of undocumented parents”
BumRushDaShow
(149,651 posts)and forces Democrats to keep going on a defensive when they do it. So sometimes doing that "two can play this game" thing will help to cancel their crap out.
Later in the article it noted that she quipped -
It ends up that the article had to explain Melania's circumstances - which in normal times, is par for the course - but under her racist-ass husband, would be considered something "illegal", and a "deportable offense".
If you don't go on the offensive, you will ALWAYS fail with the bully.
Ms. Toad
(36,402 posts)That is not why she has citizenship.
Going on the offensive does not require making up/spouting nonsense.
BumRushDaShow
(149,651 posts)It's because 45 is doing all this cherry-picking and pretzel-twisting of who is a citizen or not. WE know what the rules are supposed to be but he is intentionally muddying the waters with nonsense and his MAGat media are helping to magnify it.
45's mother was OFF THE BOAT from Scotland and was NOT even a citizen when his older brother was born. Some of the loons have made a fuss about "anchor babies" DESPITE at least one parent being a citizen (as was 45's case with his father being the citizen, as an "anchor baby" of his grandparents, neither of whom were citizens or born here).
The whole bizarre issue even goes back to the "birther" nonsense with Obama and that lead to all the crap about John McCain who was NOT "born in the United States" but on a base, where again, people had to explain what the deal is with that ( "military brats" in his case, born in Panama). It also points to Ted Cruz who literally was NOT born on U.S. soil and was also a dual citizen - and thanks to the GOP bullshit and people calling it out - forced him to eat crow and actually renounce his Canadian citizenship (his father was from Cuba and his mother was a U.S. citizen living in Canada where he was born).
"Turnabout" is fair play.
Ms. Toad
(36,402 posts)Melania's citizenship has zero to do with where she was born or who her parents were, so it makes zero sense in a conversation about birthright citizenship to ask where she or her parents were born.
It's not turnabout. It just makes us look dumb.
BumRushDaShow
(149,651 posts)45 and his ass MAGaloons have been "mudding the waters" with made-up "criteria" for "citizenship". As I said, we *know* what the rules are but the zombies will believe anything and everything 45 says and right now, ACTUAL CITIZENS are being rounded up by ICE and/or are being attacked by RW extremists, include a bunch who are "posing as ICE agents" to harass and scare citizens in certain communities.
It IS "turnabout" because it emphasizes their idiocy and leaves them few options to refute it or attack it, and if they DO, it forces them to go closer back to "the truth".
It's what happens when they pretzel-twist things "for the moment" without any thought of future consequences.
Ms. Toad
(36,402 posts)BumRushDaShow
(149,651 posts)because again - people "know" the truth (and many are living it within their families).
You have to call out their idiocy in every manner possible.
We are continually excoriated for being "too elite" and "too intellectual" and "too this" or "too that". You put it where those goats can get it, make them pay attention, and force them to refute it. Most of the rest of the public is NOT paying attention to this level "politics". It's mostly political junkies like those who post on a site like this.
Ms. Toad
(36,402 posts)Emulating idiots, just because that's how they do things, is not something I have any interest in supporting.
You can be down to earth and still be honest and logical.
BumRushDaShow
(149,651 posts)As I said before, it's called "trolling". If you can't separate "trolling" (and mocking) from "real life", there isn't much I can do to help.
Ms. Toad
(36,402 posts)BumRushDaShow
(149,651 posts)2 of 3
verb
trolled; trolling; trolls
transitive verb
(snip)
2a
: to antagonize (others) online by deliberately posting inflammatory, irrelevant, or offensive comments or other disruptive content
… trolls engage in the most outrageous and offensive behaviors possible—all the better to troll you with.—
Whitney Phillips
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/troll#:~:text=troll%20nightclubs-,2,better%20to%20troll%20you%20with.
1 of 4
verb
mocked; mocking; mocks
transitive verb
1: to treat with contempt or ridicule : deride
he has been mocked as a mama's boy—
C. P. Pierce
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mock
These are "tools in the toolbox" when you have people who won't engage intellectually.
Kali
(56,163 posts)I don't really care, just a possibility. it really is about the xenophobia and bigotry.
Ms. Toad
(36,402 posts)You're right about the motive.
I just get annoyed when we play nonsensical games, and justify it because the other side is doing the same thing.
There are ways to convey messages that everyday people can relate to without engaging in gish-gallop or dishonesty - and we should be pursuing them.
republianmushroom
(19,237 posts)BigDemVoter
(4,599 posts)She came in under an "Einstein Visa." My ASS. . . .
Cirsium
(2,137 posts)"It's highly unlikely that the Trump administration would revoke the citizenship of the president's wife and deport her."
Do you think?
CTyankee
(65,879 posts)unless it would be a constant reminder of those two criminals.
FakeNoose
(37,007 posts)I guess that's all we have now.
jmowreader
(52,038 posts)It would save him from having to fulfill the conditions in their prenup if he wants to get rid of her. I’m pretty sure her lawyers got her half his assets and none of his debt if they divorce.
Martin68
(25,245 posts)sellitman
(11,701 posts)He wouldn't have to pay her alimony when they eventually divorce.
It could save him Millions.
AmericaUnderSiege
(777 posts)But since he's denied the birthright citizenship that's in the Constitution (like pretty much all of the rest of it), might as well say he himself should be deported. He for sure serves another country and hates this one.