Final report on foreign interference

[nbsmom]

Source: CPAC airing live on YouTube

CPAC’s Michael Serapio hosts live coverage as the Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference in Federal Electoral Processes and Democratic Institutions releases its final report.

Led by Quebec judge Marie-Josée Hogue, the commission examined allegations of foreign interference by China, Russia and other foreign states in the 2019 and 2021 Canadian elections

Read more: https://www.youtube.com/live/ce6JOsjnR2o?si=G-CQlxWWV-DedRCk

[hlthe2b]

1. Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC)??????

Why the hell do any of us care about the CPAC interpretation of foreign election interference?

[nbsmom]

3. CPAC in Canada CSPAN

It’s now ended, and she didn’t take questions

[yorkster]

4. In Canada, CPAC is the Cable Public Affairs Chamel.

[hlthe2b]

5. Good to know...

[NJCher]

6. among the many answers to that

I mention a few on my thread about this yesterday:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219952426

First, is it just me or are you unaware that what we're undergoing in the U.S. is not uncommon? There is an effort worldwide and here is a BBC article that should bring you a little bit up to date:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68797624

And that link is 10 months old! There have been articles about individual nations day after day! Search it for yourself if you don't believe me. Here's your search term ( democratic nations election interference ) but you can make up one of your own by adding whatever nation you want to check into.

Why should we care? So many reasons that I can't possibly list them all, but for starters, their system is not as dysfunctional as ours. This is how EI should be dealt with. Also, you will note that on my post from yesterday, there is a report about the truckers in Canada and that is already known to have U.S. rightwing influence, Tucker Carlson to say the very least. Then there are the Proud Boys plus the Oath Keepers who most likely were involved in the convoy into Canada. And who did trump just let out of prison?

I could go on but I don't think I need to.

[hlthe2b]

7. I resent your accusation that I am unaware of this effort worldwide. I did not know the Canadian acronym

that is identical to CPAC in the US--that is all.
DONE!

Go insult someone else.

[NJCher]

8. resent all you want

Look at your own post. You give no reason whatsoever to believe you have much knowledge about the situation.

[hlthe2b]

9. Why on earth are you attacking me? Being so rude for no reason whatsoever?

I recall no negative prior episodes with you--in fact, I thought we were pretty much closely aligned in the past.

Put me on ignore if you are going to be so abrasive, condescending and accusatory toward me. Unbelievably unwarranted...

[NJCher]

10. you're reading into it

no hostility intended and fwiw, when I answer a post it's as much for other posters as the person I responded to.

[hlthe2b]

11. So you are abusive to posters to garner personal attention--as you say you "answer posts for others?"

Nice.

[NJCher]

12. again, you are misunderstanding

but it's not worth it to me to explain it. Take however way you want. I'm through with this discussion because it's just taking up my time with no visible point to me.

[Think. Again.]

2. This concern's Canada's study of interference into THEIR elections.