Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(143,747 posts)
Wed Oct 2, 2024, 02:42 PM Oct 2

Jack Smith slams Trump's 'irrelevant' Jan. 6 discovery demands, anticipates 'frivolous' appeal

Source: Law & Crime

Oct 2nd, 2024, 9:16 am


Special counsel Jack Smith spent more than a dozen pages on Tuesday slamming Donald Trump’s defense for “improper efforts to seek dismissal” of his Jan. 6 prosecution, claiming that a “deficient” filing loaded with discovery requests “irrelevant” to the immunity question before the court could set the stage for a “frivolous interlocutory appeal.”

Two weeks ago, the former president’s lawyers sought discovery on anything from the SolarWinds hack of 2020, to “FISA abuses,” to “security requests and the timing of the National Guard’s deployment on January 6,” and whether government “operatives” were present that day.

At the same time, the defense asserted that U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan should “promptly” throw out the prosecution as a consequence of the Supreme Court immunity decision in Trump v. United States and Smith’s “stubborn reliance” on details about Trump’s communications with then Vice President Mike Pence in the superseding indictment.

While the defense has strenuously opposed the the schedule for filing an immunity brief and appendix spanning some 180 pages and containing “sensitive witness statements” ahead of the 2024 election, Smith has responded by defending his office against “false” allegations that he is “motivated by improper political considerations” and by doubling down on his insistence that “public access” makes it appropriate to identify certain witnesses by their “titles and positions,” just like in the indictment:

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/jack-smith-slams-trumps-irrelevant-jan-6-discovery-demands-anticipates-frivolous-appeal-and-teases-text-message-evidence-as-voluminous-immunity-filing-looms/



Full headline: Jack Smith slams Trump’s ‘irrelevant’ Jan. 6 discovery demands, anticipates ‘frivolous’ appeal, and teases text message evidence as ‘voluminous’ immunity filing looms

Links to FILINGS (PDFs) -

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25180143/scodiscovery.pdf

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.250.0_4.pdf
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jack Smith slams Trump's 'irrelevant' Jan. 6 discovery demands, anticipates 'frivolous' appeal (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Oct 2 OP
Drumph's lawyers are in "all the way off" territory now. As in, they should fuck all the way off. Comfortably_Numb Oct 2 #1
Thanks to a judge that goes by the books. bluestarone Oct 2 #2

Comfortably_Numb

(4,120 posts)
1. Drumph's lawyers are in "all the way off" territory now. As in, they should fuck all the way off.
Wed Oct 2, 2024, 07:38 PM
Oct 2

All the way. To what looks like they have fucked all the way off. Then jump the fence and continue fucking all the way off.

bluestarone

(18,354 posts)
2. Thanks to a judge that goes by the books.
Wed Oct 2, 2024, 07:49 PM
Oct 2

IF Cannon had this, we would hear NOTHING!! My hats off to Judge Chutkan.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jack Smith slams Trump's ...