Missouri votes against banning children from carrying guns in public
Source: The Guardian
The Republican-led Missouri state house on Wednesday voted against banning minors from openly carrying firearms on public land without adult supervision. The proposal to ban children from carrying guns without adult supervision in public failed by a 104-39 vote. Only one Republican voted in support.
A Democrat, Donna Baringer, said police in her district asked for the change to stop 14-year-olds walking down the middle of the street in the city of St Louis carrying AR-15s. Now they have been emboldened, and they are walking around with them, Baringer said. Until they actually brandish them, and brandish them with intent, our police officers hands are handcuffed.
Republicans decried the effort as an unneeded infringement on gun rights. While it may be intuitive that a 14-year-old has no legitimate purpose, it doesnt actually mean that theyre going to harm someone. We dont know that yet, said Tony Lovasco, a Republican from the St Louis suburb of OFallon.
Generally speaking, we dont charge people with crimes because we think theyre going to hurt someone.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/feb/09/missouri-rejects-ban-children-carrying-guns-in-public
Its a deadly irony, passing laws just to keep the status quo is an unnecessary infringement on gun rights. The slippery slope they have been decreeing for decades works in reverse: As more and more deadly weapons are created, the fear of a slope increasing control has had the opposite effect of giving deadlier weapons to the public, and of course, multiple mass shootings on most days, which is the slippery slope sensible people have been trying to avoid.
Ray Bruns
(6,362 posts)mopinko
(73,726 posts)beau of the 5th column has mentioned that a couple times in the last week.
dont see it happening, but at least its a countervailing force.
Initech
(108,782 posts)These fuckers won't give up their guns willingly, and they want this to happen. It's a truly scary "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation.
mopinko
(73,726 posts)its good to remind them it could. might make them a little more willing to be reasonable. i know, i know. just sayin.
Blues Heron
(8,837 posts)so regulate away till they squeal with outrage.
The Jungle 1
(4,552 posts)and buy a stinger missile??? Stupid NRA won't protect my right to own a stinger.
Blues Heron
(8,837 posts)Lonestarblue
(13,479 posts)Just like the 6-year-old in Virginia who shot his teacher. I suppose the Missouri legislators think that getting into a school with a gun, or onto a playground is just too onerous and they should be allowed to freely walk in the door. Guns are now the number one cause of death for children in the US, surpassing car accidents. Will there ever be a tipping point where people just get tired of this crap and vote these idiots out of office?
newdayneeded
(2,493 posts)Condoleezza Rice type statement of "No one could have seen a 14 y/o child was gonna kill other kids with a gun".
Marcus IM
(3,001 posts)NOT!
Timeflyer
(3,756 posts)to flow and bodies to drop before using common sense regulations to prevent the killing and maiming? Is this really happening?
The Jungle 1
(4,552 posts)WTF
SouthernDem4ever
(6,619 posts)raging moderate
(4,624 posts)After I finished training as a speech/language therapist, I got a job in a rural school district traveling to six schools in three towns. I had grown up in Chicago, so there was a lot of culture shock for me (and also for them, I am sure). I remember that all the (approximately) twelve-year-old boys were carrying rifles over their shoulders much of the time. I had never seen that before. It seemed to work out all right. Although there was this bad moment when somebody was shooting at my little black and white kitten out in my backyard. I ran to her and grabbed her and saved her. Of course, I could have wound up shot. Oh, well. I am still glad I did it.
Scrivener7
(59,521 posts)And we have people here who cheer lead for them every time there is a mass slaughter.
sakabatou
(46,146 posts)newdayneeded
(2,493 posts)seat belts, because, you know, it's not like everybody gonna get in a car accident.
wnylib
(26,009 posts)seat belts and seat belt laws when they were first installed in cars. "Infringement on individual choice and freedom."
Polybius
(21,900 posts)He was in his 50's in the 80's, and when he was young, there weren't any seatbelts (at least on most cars). He said they were too uncomfortable. When I told him I was fine with them, he said "you're a kid that grew up on it and will always be used to it."
IronLionZion
(51,267 posts)That's the price of free dumb
wnylib
(26,009 posts)it was their child, spouse, or parent who got killed or permanently maimed by a child shooting a gun?
IronLionZion
(51,267 posts)Even in places like Uvalde TX, many of the parents of dead children stated they own and like guns. But would like some sort of better regulation to make it harder for high school age idiots to buy assault rifles.
Getting enough people to agree on what regulations are needed is a major challenge. I'd like to see some psych eval and references and proof of need (hunting wild hogs or whatever).
Marthe48
(23,175 posts)Off my list to visit, along with so many other bloody red states.
Escurumbele
(4,094 posts)of doing the wrong things because the ability to measure consequences is still not fully formed.
Like in Iran/Iraq/Africa where kids walk around with guns and horrible things happen, that is the goal of the GOP criminals. Way to support the police GOP.
wnylib
(26,009 posts)I believe that the reason for the right wing support of gun deregulation is to have militias to call upon for violent enforcement of RW politics.
Moostache
(11,178 posts)Organized classes - with guns drawn and locked and loaded, because 'reasons' - that explain to these armed children exactly WHY there are no jobs or manufacturing base left in Missouri, and maps to the residences of WHO voted for policies to impoverish and arm them.
No judgement or suggestion will be made, only information and details of where to find these sons of bitches and a mandate to exercise their 2nd Amendment solutions to this problem...take the arms and use them to demand answers to the questions like "where did YOU get your wealth from?" and "why are there lobbyists in your office but no constituents?" and my favorite "Why are you backing away from a legally armed citizen exercising their rights under the praised 2A? What are YOU afraid of? Can't possibly be the business end of a loaded AR-15 in the hands of someone we won't allow to vote, drink, drive or marry, amirite?"
It is NOT liberal positions or policies that are destroying the world these armed children are inheriting; and if they don't want to be impoverished slaves to a shrinking cadre of masters and their bought-and-paid-for bagmen in politics, they may want to start asking tough questions of the powers that be, while heavily armed of course...because what could possibly go wrong?
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)CaptainTruth
(8,200 posts)Prove me wrong.
JohnnyRingo
(20,870 posts)And what's to stop them? As long as they don't have a record, they have the law on their side.
I for one would be shocked to see a 15 year old in public with a sidearm, but conservatives would have a stroke if they saw an ethnic child with a 9mm in a holster. They will get back to the drawing board before you could say LaPierre.
Bayard
(29,683 posts)A kid can bring his AR-15 to Show and Tell? That's completely bonkers.
chowder66
(12,240 posts)What the hell do they think hormonal angry kids are going to do?
This is going to get real people killed as the republican politicians play with our lives. This is a shitshow.
chowder66
(12,240 posts)republianmushroom
(22,324 posts)then people will want to know "how did this happen".
That 6 year old that shot the teacher could carry totally legal. Cops asking a kid in Mo. if he's
going to school may have reason to fear for his life. Gotta love the intelligence of the republicans.