Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
District five in Fairbanks just went 100% for Bernie (Original Post) Bugenhagen Mar 2016 OP
Wow...clean sweep? n/t Hydra Mar 2016 #1
Yep Bugenhagen Mar 2016 #5
But but, what about the math? Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #12
Can we just appreciate a good win witbout poking sticks at Hillary supporters passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #20
+1000 shireen Mar 2016 #30
Shireen, I never took your reponse personally - and Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #41
Thank You. I couldn't agree more rpannier Mar 2016 #31
Then I should apologise; I was sickly vengeful when I wrote that. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #39
I'm sure everyone appreciates your apology passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #46
Unlike Hillary most of us can't afford to buy surrogates to do our stick poking for us. A Simple Game Mar 2016 #42
I read a few days ago that Alaska would be a clean sweep for Hillary. -none Mar 2016 #2
Scare tactics in their case Hydra Mar 2016 #11
Really? retrowire Mar 2016 #13
Yeah, sure n/t sharp_stick Mar 2016 #19
alaska was huge for bernie since forever roguevalley Mar 2016 #25
One caucus voter had a photo showing 67 for Bernie, ONE for HRC Lorien Mar 2016 #3
Go Alaska!! haikugal Mar 2016 #4
what's the 15% viability thing? greymouse Mar 2016 #6
Yes. In Alaska, but I don't think in Washington. Nt lostnfound Mar 2016 #7
Amy candidate who doesn't get fifteen percent Bugenhagen Mar 2016 #9
Wonderful! Thank you! Go, Bernie... GO! AzDar Mar 2016 #8
HEADLINE: "Hillary Is Not Viable Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #10
Ouch. That's gonna sting. polly7 Mar 2016 #14
Alaska was just called for Bernie! elljay Mar 2016 #15
District Five? Chasstev365 Mar 2016 #16
Seems better than District 9 FailureToCommunicate Mar 2016 #22
LOL! Chasstev365 Mar 2016 #28
Winning District 9 Looks Quite Consequential rpannier Mar 2016 #33
Hungry For Power Games rpannier Mar 2016 #32
These kind of numbers will open eyes in less liberal states or even more conservative states too. Pauldg47 Mar 2016 #17
especially when people think AK is roguevalley Mar 2016 #26
Right on!!!!! Pauldg47 Mar 2016 #34
Wowzers libodem Mar 2016 #18
Good job, Fairbanks. Blue_In_AK Mar 2016 #21
I KNEW this was going to happen! Plucketeer Mar 2016 #23
I thought Alaska was Republican? zalinda Mar 2016 #24
it is Skittles Mar 2016 #27
Maybe not, if Sanders is the nominee... modestybl Mar 2016 #36
I think Johnson was the only Democrat they went for, for president Skittles Mar 2016 #37
This year could be different. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #44
They could flip this year. noamnety Mar 2016 #40
I just wish we had more options Skittles Mar 2016 #48
With 72%counted, 79% Sanders, 20.8% Hillary. Hortensis Mar 2016 #29
With "100%" precincts reporting, Sanders 81.6%, Clinton 18.4% modestybl Mar 2016 #35
Very cool! SoapBox Mar 2016 #38
Bernin in Fairbanks. Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #43
Where are the Hillary supporters? AlbertCat Mar 2016 #45
No Candidate In History billhicks76 Mar 2016 #47
 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
12. But but, what about the math?
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 04:12 PM
Mar 2016

I thought that we should start sticking forks into Bernie? Because of numbers or something? He can't win?

Oh, and if you still vote for Sanders, you are overprivileged (not in a good way, like Clinton's hedgefund-son-in-law and his wife, but in a bad way, like someone refusing to vote for Clinton is spite of her clearly stated ovaries; did I mention she is a woman?). So apparently, all of Fairbank Five is overprivileged.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
20. Can we just appreciate a good win witbout poking sticks at Hillary supporters
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 05:00 PM
Mar 2016

There is no need to do that. And it's not helping the mood here at DU at all.

shireen

(8,337 posts)
30. +1000
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 07:02 PM
Mar 2016

Thank you for saying that.
The atmosphere has been toxic because of a few mean people on both sides. We need to be as graceful in winning as we are in losing.

Edited to add: Betty Karlson, you're not one of those "mean" people I'm referring to. But if you need to gloat, perhaps do it "at home" in the Bernie group. Just a suggestion.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
41. Shireen, I never took your reponse personally - and
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:38 AM
Mar 2016

even if you didn't mean me, I was happy to stand corrected. As a result of prolongued illness, I have been very terse lately. Bad grace must have slipt into my disposition along with the fevers.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
39. Then I should apologise; I was sickly vengeful when I wrote that.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:12 AM
Mar 2016

(literally: I have been ill for several weeks now)

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
42. Unlike Hillary most of us can't afford to buy surrogates to do our stick poking for us.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:43 AM
Mar 2016

Nor do we have relatives willing to do it in support of the continuation of their lavish lifestyle.

-none

(1,884 posts)
2. I read a few days ago that Alaska would be a clean sweep for Hillary.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 03:38 PM
Mar 2016

Apparently that was just more scare tactics from them.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
11. Scare tactics in their case
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 04:11 PM
Mar 2016

They're scared and are attempting to use tactics.

A bad combo, IMO.

Bugenhagen

(151 posts)
9. Amy candidate who doesn't get fifteen percent
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 04:04 PM
Mar 2016

In a given district is considered non - viable. The candidate is removed from consideration, and their supporters either leave or caucus with their second choice candidate. Then everyone is counted again until all remaining candidates have at least fifteen percent, then delegates are apportioned. In this case Bernie swept it in the first round.

I just heard district four was split 16 delegates for Bernie and 3 for Hillary.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
21. Good job, Fairbanks.
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 05:04 PM
Mar 2016

He did outstanding in Anchorage, too. I haven't seen that any of Alaska's districts went for Hillary. My district's count was 243 for Bernie, 109 for Hillary - or 12 state delegates for Bernie, six for Hillary. That's been one of the better results I've seen for her - still 2 to 1.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
44. This year could be different.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 10:19 AM
Mar 2016

Trump has turned off millions of Republican voters with his racist bullshit.
He has even offended Mormons in Utah.


 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
40. They could flip this year.
Sun Mar 27, 2016, 09:22 AM
Mar 2016

Alaska percentage that voted democratic in the presidential races:

2000: 28%
2004: 36%
2008: 38%
2012: 41%

There's clearly no love for Hillary there, but looking at the trend, the crap they have to pick from for republicans, and the enthusiasm for Bernie - if he's the nominee, we might win their vote. It's a long shot, but we've seen far bigger upsets this year.
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Alaska»District five in Fairbank...