Alaska
Related: About this forumCould tiny nuclear reactors power Alaska villages?
President Trumps nominee to be the next secretary of energy says he would continue the quest to develop mini nuclear reactors that could one day power communities in rural Alaska.
We want to get to a place where we can develop small micro-reactors, one to five megawatts, Dan Brouillette said Thursday at his confirmation hearing in the U.S. Senate Energy Committee.
The idea of nuclear reactors frightens many, but among their advantages is that they dont produce greenhouse gas emissions the way coal plants and diesel generators do. Energy Committee Chair Sen. Lisa Murkowski says modular reactors may be a solution for remote Alaska communities that now depend on diesel.
Brouillette is now the deputy secretary. He told Murkowski theres reason to be optimistic about the development of reactors that are a fraction of the size of those in use today.
Read more: https://www.alaskapublic.org/2019/11/14/energy-secretary-nominee-says-tiny-nuclear-reactors-could-power-alaska-villages/
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)to entertain new ways of using nuclear energy a that scale, (it is an interesting topic) but NOT under any circumstances if a Trump appointment were to oversee it or have anything at all to do with it. No way. That's courting another disaster, no matter what the subject.
In fact, it gives reason to entertain a negative bias from the start and immediately question his optimism. When we have a sane Administration, then, let's talk because the track record so far has been disastrous.
CloudWatcher
(1,923 posts)Until there is a long-term solution for disposing of the radioactive waste, you don't even have a way to calculate the real cost of this.
braddy
(3,585 posts)CentralMass
(15,537 posts)of the Bering Strait's. What could go wrong.
demigoddess
(6,675 posts)no nuclear waste to poison everything in sight.