Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

saynotoplutocrats

(40 posts)
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 02:23 PM Sep 2014

North Carolina’s Affluenza Amendment

Last year, 16 year-old Ethan Couch slammed his Ford F-350 pickup truck into four pedestrians, killing Brian Jennings, a 43-year-old Baptist youth minister; Breanna Mitchell, 24; Shelby Boyles, 21; and her 52-year-old mother, Hollie Boyles. He was speeding and had a blood-alcohol level three times the legal limit. Authorities said the teen and friends were seen on surveillance video stealing two cases of beer from a store a short time before.

Today, the future is looking bright for Ethan, thanks to his multi-millionaire Republican fund raising daddy. When Ethan was tried by Texas Republican Judge Jean Hudson Boyd, his attorney offered the “Affluenza Defense”, stating Ethan was just raised too rich to know it was wrong to kill poor people. Judge Boyd loved the defense, and gave Ethan no jail time.

Republican Speaker of the House Thom Tillis started salivating like Pavlov’s dog as soon as he heard the “Affluenza Defense” bell ring. “If kids of rich Republican donors can get away with murder in Texas, why not in North Carolina?” Thom asked. So this fall, Tillis’ Republican NC Legislature have placed the Affluenza Amendment to the NC Constitution on the NC ballot. Rich Republicans facing felony charges can now forgo a pesky jury (that may be interested in “justice” or some such nonsense), and have their sentence handed down solely by a Republican Judge bought and paid for by rich Republican donors. And unlike most states that allow non-jury felony trails, North Carolina would not require the consent of the State Prosecutor. A Republican Judge and a Republican defendant are all that are needed to sign off on a jury-free trail. If the State Prosecutor feels a jury trial would better serve the interests of justice, there is nothing he can do to stop jury-free trail and the “Affluenza Defense” by a Republican Judge and a Republican defendant.

http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/09/27/4184576_nc-voters-will-decide-whether.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
North Carolina’s Affluenza Amendment (Original Post) saynotoplutocrats Sep 2014 OP
WHAT? This is seriously outrageous! YarnAddict Sep 2014 #1
Okay, I just read the article YarnAddict Sep 2014 #2
Just more detail saynotoplutocrats Sep 2014 #3
A trial by jury is a right MrNJ Sep 2014 #4
Affluenza sounds like a virus that needs to be eradicated. iscooterliberally Sep 2014 #5

MrNJ

(200 posts)
4. A trial by jury is a right
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 03:28 PM
Sep 2014

Not a requirement.
Here in NJ anybody can request a bench trial.
Judges love it because they obviously don't have to deal with the juries.

iscooterliberally

(3,010 posts)
5. Affluenza sounds like a virus that needs to be eradicated.
Mon Sep 29, 2014, 03:48 PM
Sep 2014

How about we roll back the Ronald Reagan tax cuts, and throw some Wall Street bankers in jail.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Activist Headquarters»North Carolina’s Affluenz...