Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Alabama
Related: About this forumMontgomery council overrides veto, bans flags and symbols on city property
Thought this was interesting. Guy didn't get his "Christian Heritage Month" approved, so bans all displays except government flags.
https://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/story/news/politics/2023/11/07/heres-what-the-new-montgomery-city-council-resolution-bans/71495238007/
The Montgomery City Council voted Tuesday to override Mayor Steven Reed's veto on a "neutrality" resolution that will ban non-governmental flags and symbols on city property.
The resolution covers any city property and will keep Montgomery from putting up Christmas decorations or other holiday displays; will ban items supporting causes like pride flags; and will ban anything marking specific causes like lighting up the city pink for Breast Cancer Awareness month, unless the council votes for a specific exclusion.
...
It would allow federal, state, county or city flags while blocking "displays of any kind depicting any cause or ideology" from being placed on public property. The resolution was crafted to override any executive order and can only be amended by a majority vote of the council.
...
The council decided to work on the initiative after Lyons put forward a resolution that would designate a month to be Christian Heritage Month and would require the city to fly flags associated with the month. Lyons withdrew the proposal after local religious leaders spoke out against it.
The resolution covers any city property and will keep Montgomery from putting up Christmas decorations or other holiday displays; will ban items supporting causes like pride flags; and will ban anything marking specific causes like lighting up the city pink for Breast Cancer Awareness month, unless the council votes for a specific exclusion.
...
It would allow federal, state, county or city flags while blocking "displays of any kind depicting any cause or ideology" from being placed on public property. The resolution was crafted to override any executive order and can only be amended by a majority vote of the council.
...
The council decided to work on the initiative after Lyons put forward a resolution that would designate a month to be Christian Heritage Month and would require the city to fly flags associated with the month. Lyons withdrew the proposal after local religious leaders spoke out against it.
This story has a little more (emphasis mine).
The Council took up the issue after councilman Brantley Lyons introduced a resolution to designate a month Christian Heritage Month, but was forced to withdraw it after local religious leaders spoke out against it, according to the Advertiser. One local minister told the Council that the Christian Heritage flag, which the city would have been required to display under Lyons resolution, was not a symbol that would make many people feel welcome in the city.
Lyons abruptly withdrew the resolution. When reporters attempted to ask him about it, Lyons, the elected representative of an entire city district, told them he doesnt speak to the media.
Reed also told the Advertiser that the hypocrisy of including birthplace of the confederacy on the city seal while claiming neutrality wasnt lost on him.
Lyons abruptly withdrew the resolution. When reporters attempted to ask him about it, Lyons, the elected representative of an entire city district, told them he doesnt speak to the media.
Reed also told the Advertiser that the hypocrisy of including birthplace of the confederacy on the city seal while claiming neutrality wasnt lost on him.
I'm not sure it's a terrible idea. The ban only applies to government buildings, so ... ? At least it shuts down discussion of which displays are okay or not okay. But Reed makes an excellent point.
I did a google search for "Christian Heritage flag" and didn't get anything with that name - but a lot of links and images about the "Christian Flag". Presumably that was the flag that would have had to be flown? For those who have gotten this far, Patheos has a discussion about it, with an image. Let's just say there is an awful lot of white on that flag.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 2920 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Montgomery council overrides veto, bans flags and symbols on city property (Original Post)
RandomNumbers
Nov 2023
OP
DBoon
(23,082 posts)1. so they ban "non-govermental flags"
Does this mean flags of the Confederacy are allowed?
eppur_se_muova
(37,500 posts)2. Sounds like Nazi flages aren't prohibited, either. nt