General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWoman reveals crushing oppression of life under ISIS terror in video shot from under her niqab




Living under the ISIS terror: Woman reveals crushing oppression of life in fundamentalist regime in video shot from under her niqab
The unidentified woman captures rare glimpse into life in new regime
She is approached by gunman who berate her for showing face
Women are also seen with Kalashnikovs slung over their shoulders
French women are seen speaking to worried relatives at home
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2768352/Extraordinary-footage-heart-ISIS-regime-filmed-woman-wore-secret-camera-burqa.html#ixzz3EHUicvG1
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
randome
(34,845 posts)Because it costs money to stop ISIS!
Because it's really none of our business how people are subjugated!
Because...some previous CIA guys did some bad things, too!
Because...fighting is hard!
[hr][font color="blue"][center]TECT in the name of the Representative approves of this post.[/center][/font][hr]
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)But they don't add up to much, either. Whatever our motivations and whatever the outcome, what ISIS is doing is much, much worse than this woman's experience. Beheading strangers, kidnapping girls.
I have no problem with wiping them from the face of the Earth. To the extent where anyone with half a brain cell would never dare call themselves part of ISIS.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]All things in moderation, including moderation.[/center][/font][hr]
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)There's not a better working definition of a strawman than what you've provided here. If you wish to talk about what others are discussing in other threads, it would be useful for you to either provide antecedents, or actually post in the threads that concern your points.
randome
(34,845 posts)I just saved everyone the time of posting them.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You have to play the game to find out why you're playing the game. -Existenz[/center][/font][hr]
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I was responding to a strawman argument, which in turn was responding to the OP. The OP does a decent job of showing us what a bunch of dickheads ISIS is--almost as bad as the Saudis. The OP has nothing at all to do with our military engagement against ISIS.
I've probably started 50 threads dealing with what an asshole Dick Cheney is. In NONE of those threads did I forward a plan to go do bodily harm to him. These are very different things. I'm pretty sure every last person on this site would agree that the Islamic State is a bunch of losers. But of course, that doesn't mean everyone has the same opinion about what should be done about them.
So you can go find someone else to be the spokesperson for all progressives, and you can attack that person. I'm not playing the game. I posted in order to point out a strawman argument that was being made. I successfully and incontrovertibally did that, so unless the spirit moves me, I'm done here.
wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)So I figured if you think they misrepresent 'progressive' arguments against the war, you could set us straight.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)You and the other poster are referring to other threads, threads I'm not involved with. Good luck.
wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Read this and then don't get back to me: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)No arguments have been misrepresented.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I'm hardly a dove philosophically, I just don't see any obtainable military objectives here or any way that we will make the situation better through military action.
cali
(114,904 posts)In fact, I think it's counterproductive. The history that matters isn't whether CIA guys have done bad stuff, it's that our history of military intervention in the region has failed massively. and yes, history counts.
oh, and boko haram? the DRC? and all the other places in the world where people are terribly oppressed?
Oh, and yes, how much it costs, particularly in the context of what we'll have to sacrifice for it, is of consequence- at least to people suffering here. You do know that people in these United States suffer, right?
randome
(34,845 posts)People here don't need to suffer at all if Conservatives would get off their lazy asses and agree to do something about them. Right now we're stuck with Conservatives and the Middle East is stuck with ISIS.
We could use an intervention of our own. Won't someone bomb the House of Representatives? I'd be in favor of that. Maybe not until the House starts beheading people.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]
freshwest
(53,661 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]All things in moderation, including moderation.[/center][/font][hr]
RandiFan1290
(6,710 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Saudi Arabia doesn't have the same urgency as ISIS but I would be in favor of using all our trading power to advocate for greater equality.
That's the kind of 'crusade' I could get behind: either loosen your restrictions or we'll stop trading with you.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Because they are nice to us while they are stoning women for adultery?
When exactly do we start doing something about the Saudi's?
randome
(34,845 posts)I wish we would do more to advocate for equal rights everywhere. We're powerful enough financially and militarily to do that, although forcing our military on otherwise peaceful countries would likely backfire.
ISIS is not a country and not peaceful so...
The only difference between SA and ISIS is that SA is abiding by their laws, as warped as they are. ISIS cares nothing for law.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)While I am totally opposite in the way I think(keeping it in the family? kinda fucked up in my view) I do see you having a reasoned argument.... As much as I disagree
, so let me ask you why ISIS is so urgent.
They have money and income. I see that. What they don't have are people. 30,000? That's not an army it's a concert audience. Weapons? They had one tank they managed to steal, but we blew the shit out of it with an air strike.
Beheadings? Cops are shooting black kids on an almost daily basis right here at home. Yeah a bullet from a cop doesn't grab your attention like cutting off a reporters head, but it's the same outcome.
Protection at home? Seriously? Please tell me you aren't in Lindsay Graham "They're coming to get us in South Carolina!" land..
I just don't get it. Any reasonable cause I can find just makes us hypocrites for kissing the hand of Saudi Arabia.
I keep looking for who asked for our help. I know Rwanda did and we ignored them. Somalia too. But did someone say "come to Syria and help us take our town back from ISIS?
This is with all respect to your opinion... It's kind of nice to have it out with someone who can present a reasoned argument and remain clam and friendly
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)As soon as the ISIS threat is gone Saudi Arabia will come to the USA and get their hand kissed.
Either the numbers for ISIS "membership" are stupidly underestimated or we are a bunch of fucking hypocrites.
RandiFan1290
(6,710 posts)Uncle Joe
(65,127 posts)Thanks for the thread, Liberal_in_LA.
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)royalty. Or that could be a coincidence.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)It won't do a fucking thing, of course, but it will make the Repukes, MIC, and BOG feel great
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)
customerserviceguy
(25,406 posts)that we might possibly help succeed over ISIS is SOOO much more enlightened when it comes to equal rights for women.
They're all cut out of the same cloth, it's just a matter of which faction is the boogeyman at any particular time.