General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHEY--> Yesterday, a 12-word Tweet caused the stock market to briefly lose $134 BILLION dollars
I posted about this yesterday and I'm going to post about it today.
From today, In the age of speedy computer trading, a phony tweet and algorithms can send stocks plunging:
No sooner did hackers send a false Associated Press tweet reporting explosions at the White House on Tuesday than investors started dumping stocks eventually unloading $134 billion worth.
Except most of the investors werent human. They were computers, selling on autopilot beyond the control of humans, like a scene from a sci-fi horror film.
Before you could blink, it was over, said Joe Saluzzi, co-founder of Themis Trading and an outspoken critic of high-speed computerized trading. With people, you wouldnt have this type of reaction.
For decades, computers have been sorting through data and news to help investment funds decide whether to buy or sell. But thats old school. Now algorithmic trading programs sift through data, news, even tweets, and execute trades by themselves in fractions of a second, without slowpoke humans getting in the way. More than half of stock trading every day is done this way.
--snip--
Much more at the link(s). Very much worth your time to read.
PB
kentuck
(115,406 posts)and Congress does nothing.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)...worse and worse. I have no idea how absurd it gets before the people in "charge" do something about it. I mean, that would make the fake Tweet the most expensive Tweet in history and possibly the most damaging hoax ever released- at $11 billion a word!
PB
progressoid
(53,179 posts)until it directly impacts them.
Or when their million dollar donors write some legislation for them to pimp.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)is that it already impacts them - just in the opposite way. These automatic triggers make the rich millions and billions of dollars in short periods of times - they've already gained FAR more than they'll ever lose. The people who profit the most from this automated trading are also the same people who are NEVER going to lose THEIR money. The 1% of the 1%.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)People get screwed by a black box.
Baitball Blogger
(52,344 posts)If this could happen by accident, what can happen when someone knows how to trigger those machines with a "boo!"
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)It would be far less profitable to do mass trading so quickly using bots.
The entire concept of making money on high volume fast speed trading back and forth all day does nothing but leach pennies from huge volume traded at high speed that add up, how can this possibly add to "the market" in any way that isn't negative?
I'm no Gordon Gekko master of the universe, but profiting from producing absolutely nothing at all of any kind of value appears parasitic even when done manually.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Hoping no one lost their jobs on 'Main Street' from this?
This was one of Elliot Spitzer's ideas...
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
zeeland
(247 posts)is invested in the market and disappears in a matter of seconds. "oops, must have
been one of those pesky algorithmic glitches."
burnodo
(2,017 posts)Just proves that information can be used as a weapon.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
mia
(8,480 posts)Thank you, I would have missed this.
BobTheSubgenius
(12,217 posts)The Forbin Project can't be far in the future.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)faster than you can say "bailout," that word that warms every banker's cold, dead heart.