Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(88,339 posts)
Tue Jul 7, 2026, 06:29 AM 9 hrs ago

Why Hakeem Jeffries may not have a vote problem

Despite threats from some progressive candidates, like Colorado’s Melat Kiros, to oppose a Hakeem Jeffries speakership over his support from corporate PACs and AIPAC, the House Democratic leader doesn’t have a vote problem on his hands yet on the level that sank Kevin McCarthy’s speakership years ago.

The underlying conditions are unlikely to change, with Jeffries stressing in a recent interview that his average contribution came from a small donor......

The last time a potential Democratic speaker faced turbulence, purple-district Democrats threatened to vote against Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in 2019 and 2021. Pelosi faced internal dissent in the caucus vote but not enough to sink her speakership on the House floor, especially after she made a deal with holdouts to limit her term to secure support. This time, the criticism of a would-be speaker is coming from the left flank of the caucus — progressives who want Jeffries to shift his positions.

Capitol Hill Democrats hope the new insurgent candidates might still change their tune once they enter Congress; unlike when the progressive “Squad” first came into Congress and faced a hostile reception from colleagues, the newer progressives might encounter sitting lawmakers who offer a welcoming attitude and mentorship. Progressive Caucus Chair Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, has been in touch with Kiros and the Democratic Socialists of America-aligned candidates, according to a person familiar with the conversations. And there are still subtle signs of a shift on the thorny issues around Israel within the caucus, after the liberal organization J Street endorsed Jeffries and his leadership team for the first time this Congress.




https://www.semafor.com/article/07/07/2026/why-hakeem-jeffries-may-not-have-a-vote-problem

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Hakeem Jeffries may not have a vote problem (Original Post) RandySF 9 hrs ago OP
A lot depends on the size of the majority SocialDemocrat61 9 hrs ago #1
We won't know until November Fiendish Thingy 6 hrs ago #2
Have to see how the rest of the primaries go but either way I dont think there was ever a real concern for him SSJVegeta 6 hrs ago #3

SocialDemocrat61

(8,460 posts)
1. A lot depends on the size of the majority
Tue Jul 7, 2026, 06:39 AM
9 hrs ago

if it's only 5 or 10 seats, every vote is important. If it's 20 or 30 seats, some members will be allowed to vote their conscience.

Fiendish Thingy

(24,651 posts)
2. We won't know until November
Tue Jul 7, 2026, 09:24 AM
6 hrs ago

Right now, Politico says Dems are having a “hot insurgent summer”, which sounds kind of sexy, but in the end it will come down to simple mathematics:

If the number of “hot insurgents” elected to congress is greater than the margin of the Dems majority, then Jefferies might need to worry.

I don’t see that happening.

Dems will likely pick up 20-40 seats, and so far the number of Democratic Socialist nominees running for house seats numbers less than a dozen.

The significance of these candidates isn’t whether they can or will deny Jefferies the speakership, but in the fire and the fight they will bring to the daily business in the house.

SSJVegeta

(3,522 posts)
3. Have to see how the rest of the primaries go but either way I dont think there was ever a real concern for him
Tue Jul 7, 2026, 09:27 AM
6 hrs ago

At least not because of progressives.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Hakeem Jeffries may n...