General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'I'm Sorry, Can I Have An Answer To My Question?'
Forbes Breaking News
May 23, 2026
At Wednesday's Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) questioned Keith M. Bass, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs.
Srkdqltr
(9,979 posts)GoCubsGo
(35,025 posts)Enough of letting them get away with their obfuscating.
LogDog75
(1,391 posts)I get my medications from the local Navy Clinic but for a short while, I tried Express Scripts so I wouldn't have to go the the clinic's pharmacy. It would take about a week for my meds to arrive in the mail whereas I could get a refill at the clinic in 2 - 3 days. Having worked in AF medical materiel (supply) and having bought bought our pharmacy's drugs, I know the cost to the military is about 40% less than what civilian pharmacies pay. That's because the military has a greater buying power than non-military pharmacies. By getting my med from the Navy Clinic, I'm helping save the government money.
Tricare is divided into three regions; East, West, and Overseas. A large military hospital oversees the contract for a Tricare region for all the military hospitals. They provide usage data to a pharmaceutical wholesaler, known as a Prime Vendor, who bases individual drug prices upon the amount of the drug they will sell over the next year. This allows the wholesaler to negotiate with drug companies to obtain a lower price which is then passed on to the military in either lower prices or a rebate.
Having helped manage a pharmaceutical Prime Vendor contract, I was privy to seeing what the actual drug prices we were being charged. Using Red Book, which lists the prices of drugs, I did a short evaluation of the what we paid versus what civilian pharmacies paid. My evaluation showed we paid about 40% less for the drugs than out civilian counterparts.
erronis
(24,605 posts)TxGuitar
(4,362 posts)Otherwise, why not post this video in the Videos group? Not everyone can view videos, whether because of technology limitations or the fact that people are at work. How hard is it to summarize or provide salient points?
I personally don't like watching videos because they end up being long winded and take forever to make a point (like Rachel Maddow). At least post the transcript.
Too many times someone will post a long video instead of giving us the time mark where we can skip to to see what is going on.
In the video for this thread, I watched it in its entirety and it was worth it. I understood the terminology Warren was using and I could understand the mostly non-answer the assistant secretary was giving.
erronis
(24,605 posts)We're probably going to end up with an AI-"enhanced" transcript if we're not careful.