Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDOJ releases legal rationale for nationwide voter data collection
Ari Melber and Professor Mellissa Murray laughed at this stunt
Link to tweet
?si=FPtZ9g2JjJ5ysDbG
Marc Elias was also amused
Link to tweet
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DOJ releases legal rationale for nationwide voter data collection (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
4 hrs ago
OP
Trump DOJ cites its own legal memo to defend voter roll demands on eve of appeal
LetMyPeopleVote
4 hrs ago
#1
There's probably more MAGAts sending in their dead spouse's mail in ballots than non citizen's voting
ChicagoTeamster
3 hrs ago
#3
LetMyPeopleVote
(181,820 posts)1. Trump DOJ cites its own legal memo to defend voter roll demands on eve of appeal
trump has lost 6 of these cases. The trump DOJ has no authority for its position and so is making up authority by citing a DOJ legal memo. I was coming home from a meeting and I heard Ari Melber and Professor Mellissa Murray laugh at this stunt.
Trump DOJ Cites Its Own Legal Memo to Defend Voter Roll Demands on Eve of Appeal | Democracy Docket
— r/protectUSelections (@protectuselections.bsky.social) 2026-05-12T23:21:25.399760+00:00
https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/trump-doj-cites-its-own-legal-memo-to-defend-voter-roll-demands-on-eve-of-appeal/
With a key appeal looming, the Department of Justice cited an unusual source to defend its sweeping voter roll demands: itself.
In a filing Tuesday, just one day before oral arguments in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, DOJ submitted a newly issued internal legal opinion as supplemental authority a memo written by its own Office of Legal Counsel and published the same day it was filed.
The department told the court the memo supports its argument that the Civil Rights Act of 1960 allows DOJ to force states to hand over unredacted statewide voter registration lists and then share that data with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).....
Rather than pointing the appeals court to a new ruling from another court backing its position, DOJ pointed to a legal opinion it wrote for itself that same day.
In other words, with real legal precedent in short supply, DOJ is now citing its own homework and asking the court to treat it like the answer key.
The OLC opinion concludes that DOJ has authority to compel states to produce voter registration lists, even if the department plans to share them with DHS or another federal unit.....
For now, DOJ is heading into argument with a legal strategy that amounts to asking the court to trust DOJs view of DOJs power even after multiple courts have already said no.
DOJ also cited its own opinion in the Ninth Circuit in its appeal to cases out of California and Oregon.
In a filing Tuesday, just one day before oral arguments in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, DOJ submitted a newly issued internal legal opinion as supplemental authority a memo written by its own Office of Legal Counsel and published the same day it was filed.
The department told the court the memo supports its argument that the Civil Rights Act of 1960 allows DOJ to force states to hand over unredacted statewide voter registration lists and then share that data with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).....
Rather than pointing the appeals court to a new ruling from another court backing its position, DOJ pointed to a legal opinion it wrote for itself that same day.
In other words, with real legal precedent in short supply, DOJ is now citing its own homework and asking the court to treat it like the answer key.
The OLC opinion concludes that DOJ has authority to compel states to produce voter registration lists, even if the department plans to share them with DHS or another federal unit.....
For now, DOJ is heading into argument with a legal strategy that amounts to asking the court to trust DOJs view of DOJs power even after multiple courts have already said no.
DOJ also cited its own opinion in the Ninth Circuit in its appeal to cases out of California and Oregon.
Baitball Blogger
(52,704 posts)2. We need to stay on our feet. They will
Keep trying, so dont let your guard down.
ChicagoTeamster
(1,237 posts)3. There's probably more MAGAts sending in their dead spouse's mail in ballots than non citizen's voting
Chasstev365
(8,107 posts)4. GO FUCK YOURSELVES!