Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(23,459 posts)
Wed Apr 8, 2026, 04:32 PM 18 hrs ago

Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-NM): AG's office "tried to inform the Oversight Committee" that Bondi would not appear

Rep. Melanie Stansbury (NM-01)

‪@repstansbury.bsky.social‬

Follow
Today, the AG’s office tried to inform the Oversight Committee that Pam Bondi would not appear for her deposition.

I hope she is ready to face contempt. Otherwise, we look forward to seeing you at your deposition.

AG or not—those responsible will be held accountable. Survivors deserve justice.
3:35 PM · Apr 8, 2026

Everybody can reply

Today, the AG’s office tried to inform the Oversight Committee that Pam Bondi would not appear for her deposition.

I hope she is ready to face contempt. Otherwise, we look forward to seeing you at your deposition.

AG or not—those responsible will be held accountable. Survivors deserve justice.

Rep. Melanie Stansbury (NM-01) (@repstansbury.bsky.social) 2026-04-08T19:35:56.726Z
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-NM): AG's office "tried to inform the Oversight Committee" that Bondi would not appear (Original Post) Miles Archer 18 hrs ago OP
What's good for the Clintons must be good for Bondi malaise 18 hrs ago #1
CONTEMPT! YES!!! spanone 18 hrs ago #2
Repukes defy Congressional subpoenas without consequence. maxsolomon 18 hrs ago #3
They have six fascist so-called "justices" making it all OK for them to ignore congressional subpoenas. MLWR 17 hrs ago #4
Unfortunately, this is historically accurate. WestMichRad 16 hrs ago #8
So . . . AverageOldGuy 17 hrs ago #5
Congress did issue a subpoena. maxsolomon 16 hrs ago #7
I believe that the House could dispatch the Sargent-at-Arms, but that hasn't been done since the 30s. flashman13 15 hrs ago #9
Thank you Melanie 🩵 Clouds Passing 17 hrs ago #6
What say ye James Comer? Uncle Joe 15 hrs ago #10
So another kick the can down the road ploy from the Just Us dept.? GreenWave 15 hrs ago #11
"in her capacity as" Ruby the Liberal 1 hr ago #12

MLWR

(1,040 posts)
4. They have six fascist so-called "justices" making it all OK for them to ignore congressional subpoenas.
Wed Apr 8, 2026, 06:05 PM
17 hrs ago

AverageOldGuy

(3,924 posts)
5. So . . .
Wed Apr 8, 2026, 06:09 PM
17 hrs ago

. . . why not issue a subpeona and when she refuses, send US marshals to drag her sorry ass in for deposition?

maxsolomon

(38,812 posts)
7. Congress did issue a subpoena.
Wed Apr 8, 2026, 06:21 PM
16 hrs ago

Congress cannot dispatch US Marshals.

US Marshals are controlled by the DOJ and the AG.

flashman13

(2,436 posts)
9. I believe that the House could dispatch the Sargent-at-Arms, but that hasn't been done since the 30s.
Wed Apr 8, 2026, 07:25 PM
15 hrs ago

Uncle Joe

(65,199 posts)
10. What say ye James Comer?
Wed Apr 8, 2026, 07:31 PM
15 hrs ago

(snip)

The committee's head, Republican Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, enforced subpoenas on Bill and Hillary Clinton this year, making the ex-president and ex-secretary of state, respectively, among the highest-ranking former government officials ever to be subpoenaed by Congress.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/bondi-wont-appear-for-house-deposition-next-week-in-the-epstein-investigation

Thanks for the thread Miles Archer

GreenWave

(12,657 posts)
11. So another kick the can down the road ploy from the Just Us dept.?
Wed Apr 8, 2026, 07:36 PM
15 hrs ago

Doesn't she know she got fired?

Ruby the Liberal

(26,668 posts)
12. "in her capacity as"
Thu Apr 9, 2026, 09:31 AM
1 hr ago

Guessing that wasn't how the subpoena was issued?

CNN is reporting this from Nancy Mace (!)

“Pam Bondi cannot escape accountability simply because she no longer holds the office of Attorney General. Our motion to subpoena Pam Bondi, which was passed by the Oversight Committee, was for Bondi by name, not by title. She will still have to appear before the Oversight Committee for a sworn deposition,” Mace said on X. “The American people deserve answers, and we expect her to appear as soon as a new date is set.”


https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/08/politics/pam-bondi-epstein-deposition-justice-department

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D...