General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary Clinton's opening statement to Committee
Last edited Thu Feb 26, 2026, 02:54 PM - Edit history (1)
Hillary Clinton just posted her opening statement to the Comer Committee which she is testifying before today. It's part of the Save Donald from Epstein Investigation. The committee has essentially taken over the town of Chappaqua for the purpose. @hillaryclinton.bsky.social
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm.bsky.social) 2026-02-26T16:32:09.433Z
For those having trouble reading the Bluesky link, Bigtree has a clear image of the opening statement here
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100221050746
malaise
(296,199 posts)Eff these hypocrites
chowder66
(12,255 posts)Just_Vote_Dem
(3,646 posts)Such brilliance from this lady!
Cha
(319,167 posts)yaesu
(9,332 posts)newdeal2
(5,440 posts)hamsterjill
(17,583 posts)Question to the group, please. I've not been keeping up with the news the last few days and have not heard why the Clintons decided to agree to testify without it being a public testimony.
Does anyone know why they did? This is not a snide comment. I love both Big Dawg and Hillary and I was simply hoping to be able to see their testimony live.
gab13by13
(32,354 posts)hamsterjill
(17,583 posts)Wish they had held out.
I understand that Bill is trying to set a precedent (i.e., that former Presidents can be compelled to testify), but I sure wish they would have held their ground so that the world could see (live) what they had to say and not have their words spun by Faux News.
ScratchCat
(2,742 posts)A court never ruled he had to. He is setting no precedent. Only SCOTUS can do that.
There is no scenario where Donald J. Trump will ever be forced by a court of law to be interviewed by Congress. None. Zero. Zip. Nada. All Bill did was guarantee a perjury investigation against Hillary and himself.
hamsterjill
(17,583 posts)n/t
LiberalArkie
(19,820 posts)As a "president", the supremes allow him to say anything he wants to say. If anyone disagrees or questions his testimony he can just call the Marshalls and have them arrested and sent to Gitmo. Who can stop him? Dictators are allowed to do that.
Response to ScratchCat (Reply #13)
the nelm This message was self-deleted by its author.
Could have went to court and beat that easily,they choose to testify ( Remember the president or former president is immune from prosecution)
MadameButterfly
(4,043 posts)I suspect we'll see Hillary's too. Certainly we are reading it.
She has a history of making Republicans sorry they forced her to testify (remember Bengazi).
She can run circles around all of them.
RussBLib
(10,637 posts)Several sentences just end at the end of a line.
I wish Hillary would insist that, if the Committee insists on interviewing First Ladies, you should call Melania Trump. After all, Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. Rumor is Jeffrey had sex with her before selling her to Donald. Melania would know far more about Epstein than I would.
But they dont want the truth. They only want to score points with the Orange Blob.
SheltieLover
(80,547 posts)Justice matters.
(9,795 posts)their disgusting gamesmanship and criminal cover up machinations.
ShazzieB
(22,616 posts)The text in the Blue Sky post is incomplete. There is text missing from the bottom of each of the first 3 pages. To see the full statement, you have to click on the Blue Sky post and then scroll through the four pages to read all of it.
It would be nice to have a direct link to the full text of the statement. I'm sure it is available online somewhere other than Blue Sky, but I can't find it.
SouthernOregonDem
(7 posts)obnoxiousdrunk
(3,115 posts)saying ? I can't see anything.
malaise
(296,199 posts)You can access all the pages and enlarge
Add
thesquanderer
(13,012 posts)malaise
(296,199 posts)It will work.
thesquanderer
(13,012 posts)No additional pages to click on.

malaise
(296,199 posts)malaise
(296,199 posts)GiqueCee
(4,286 posts)... a few sentences were cut off in the middle of making a point. Who edited this statement?
Other than that, Senator Clinton's statement was brilliant, and to the point. It carved Comer and his klan a richly deserved new one. Sadly, sociopaths are congenitally incapable of shame, because that's what they all deserve.
JT45242
(4,049 posts)How much better would we all be if she had been elected instead of Mango Mussolini?
How much better would the world have been if a well educated serious person had been in charge of the most powerful country during the pandemic?
I weep for where we are now, knowing that if she had won, where we would likely be.
MineralMan
(151,281 posts)So they voted for Jill Stein. Weird shit!
RussBLib
(10,637 posts)
. How about exuming Ivanas grave on Donnies golf course? Id bet money some of the Trump-Epstein files are buried with her.
The orange blob never returned a lot of classified docs he took when he left the White House. Id bet even more money that some of the docs he never returned involved Jeffrey Epstein.
ttps://russblib.blogspot.com/?m=1
PATRICK
(12,397 posts)Why else the feverish personal scanning through countless files? He could be no judge nor waste time on anything else, even IF he was trying to find blackmail on his relatively innocent enemies. Immensely stupid and even more desperate that his brazen control keeps escalating to deny the mountain of evidence in the mountain range of files any accountability.
democrank
(12,607 posts)than all Republicans combined.
NNadir
(38,089 posts)...exactly as they deserve.
usonian
(25,393 posts)Please have the courtesy of doing a simple dumbass web search to get legible text.
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c626qqrl76nt
This is a thorough, timely and dynamite article.
Respectfully (sorta)
Usonian.
neohippie
(1,267 posts)The post is on BlueSky NOT Twitter, and if you click on them you can go to the BlueSky post and there if you click on them it gives your larger images of the full pages of text that are easily read.
But all of that, may be technically challenging to someone, if you are not tech savvy enough to distinguish between Twitter which no longer exists in that name and other social media applications
However you apparently were savvy enough to search and find a link where you read the statement and posted it. so there is that
niyad
(132,508 posts)usonian
(25,393 posts)And the images came from text.
I have OCR'ed a ton over time.
BlueSky had a real opportunity to improve on twitter but it's so "more of the same"
DU is infinitely better, with its "slightly better than 1980's" format.
And I visit Hacker News often, with a text format that's like usenet.
The internet is toxic, unreadable crap because "tech leaders" are Bozos. Including Bezos. And people eat it up instead of demanding better.
"I'm mad as hell and not going to take this any more."

And have a great day. Without OCR.
niyad
(132,508 posts)thesquanderer
(13,012 posts)mountain grammy
(29,038 posts)Too bad republicans cant read or comprehend.
Vinca
(54,002 posts)Prairie Gates
(8,186 posts)Botany
(77,352 posts)Go Hillary!
Instead, you have compelled me to testify, fully aware that I have no knowledge that would assist your investigation, in order to distract attention from President Trump's actions and to cover them up despite legitimate calls for answers.
Justice matters.
(9,795 posts)they should subpoena the melanium and ask her if the predator sold her to their beloved pedo fraudster.
Botany
(77,352 posts)
. sex worker who damn well knew what Jeffery Epsteins child sex trafficking operation was
all about. I now wonder if Vlad Putin was providing girls to Melania who passed them onto
Maxwell/Epsteins sex/blackmail business?
mcar
(46,064 posts)and I'm talking about people on the left.
Scalded Nun
(1,694 posts)What this country wasted when it allowed charlatans to so deceive its populace and instead put in place the absolute worst that humanity has to offer. Twice.
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,958 posts)



Pluvious
(5,400 posts)OMGWTF
(5,134 posts)JohnnyRingo
(20,882 posts)They fear her. They are not in control of this woman and her words carry great weight.
I would think they'd learned after Benghazi, but that was also theater to distract from the election. They found her innocent of all charges almost immediately after the election.
Well... They're running that play again.
Warpy
(114,616 posts)being stinking, corrupt Repoublicans, have you noticed? I'm sure Ms. Clinton has, they've been doing it for over 30 years now. Tou'd think they'd havee come up with someone else to litigate to death in that amount of time, but I guerss they are not only slow, they're stuck.
This is a distraction, a stupid one since evebn hard line MAGAts are bored with the Clintons. It's not going to work. Again.
Here is my opening statement to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee today.




purr-rat beauty
(1,259 posts)I can see her stealing this when she gets tagged to speak
leftstreet
(40,730 posts)GoodRaisin
(10,924 posts)Krasnovs pedophilia will be revealed. But sooner or later Nutlicker and Krasnov and the other pedophiles will be compelled to testify. Bondi will be compelled to reveal the missing files implicating Krasnov raping a child. Presidential immunity will only protect them for so long. Might not be long at all.
Police should check Krasnovs wee wee for a bite scar.
Initech
(108,799 posts)GiqueCee
(4,286 posts)... was the most highly qualified candidate for president in my lifetime and I'm OLD! What the Republicans are doing now is an obscenity; shit, everything about Der Republican Party is an obscenity! NO decent person can continue to support their criminality.
There will be a price to pay, you evil fucks, and you will pay dearly.