General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo I heard a good response to why the Republicans will want the Save Act to fail.
Last edited Mon Feb 16, 2026, 12:28 PM - Edit history (1)
According to the Save Act, your birth certificate and current name must match, which means that women will be at a disadvantage. Our side is worried about this because it will directly affect women who married and changed their names. The only sure way around this is if you have a passport ID.
But some astute person on the net says that this is unfavorable to the Republicans, because more Democrats than Republicans carry a passport. The blue States, in other words, will be impacted less than the Red States, which will, in essence, disenfranchise their own trad wives.
Interesting to think about, anyway.
underpants
(195,697 posts)ChicagoTeamster
(645 posts)MLWR
(923 posts)UpInArms
(54,530 posts)I realize that is mean and petty.
I could only wish that any of you had experienced the level of hate that has been directed at me from them. You might understand my point of view, were you me.
Thank you for putting up with my liberal ways and giving me a place where the constant vitriol is not poured upon me in an unceasing way.
RainCaster
(13,498 posts)Dem wives are more inclined to keep their last name.
AZJonnie
(3,315 posts)Also, this change is likely to cause a LOT of women to reconsider doing so in the future as well. Most liberal men don't mind one bit if their partner wants to keep her maiden name. Right-wing men are much more likely to care if they don't.
thought crime
(1,391 posts)Among other things, her surname begins with a 'D' while mine begins with a 'W'. Our grownup kids are pretty grateful.
FalloutShelter
(14,336 posts)Even MAGA women don't want to jump through their Nazi hoops and to obtain a passport to vote?
I'm old enough to remember when you got a passport to see Paris ... not the voting booth at the local church hall.
This is some bullshit.
The PAPERS PLEASE ACT... has to go down in flames.
Wednesdays
(22,009 posts)...as a new form of poll tax.
But with this SCOTUS, ya never know.
peggysue2
(12,455 posts)The whole idea is just another plan to reduce women to second-class citizens firmly under the thumb of the men in their lives. Less higher education, early marriages from which there is no escape (tighten up divorce law) and grinding out as many babies as possible. No contraception. No abortion, of course. And no way to vote scum-bags out of office.
Happy Days!
usonian
(24,282 posts)
TBF
(36,097 posts)are already talking online about reverting to our maiden names. We will change them back through the courts, update our passports, and on we go. I already talked to my husband about it and he doesn't care.
NH Ethylene
(31,302 posts)Especially for women who have been married several times, changing their last name each time. They would have to provide marriage certificates and divorce decrees to complete the chain of name changes.
TBF
(36,097 posts)will probably be a little annoying and time consuming, but I'm ready.
Walleye
(44,171 posts)If we need a photo ID after we have registered why doesnt the state issue photo registration cards. When I registered they sent me a registration card which I use at the polls every time. Put a photo on that and we got it made. Howis someone such as me, whos been voting in the same polling place for 30 years supposed to prove shes an American citizen right now. The people working the polls there recognize me!
SSJVegeta
(2,555 posts)😒 🤔
Quiet Em
(2,665 posts)They think Democratic women are all single cat ladies.
Thankfully it looks like this horrible bill will never make it through the Senate.
The only reason they are even pushing this is because the con artist will not admit he lost the 2020 election and the con artist will try everything to cheat and steal elections.
F-18_AMO
(13 posts)Rethugs know that most Americans dont have a passport. The impact on those who dont have one or cant afford one should not be underestimated. The fascists are looking at the midterms and not really beyond that because they wont need to.
Zackzzzz
(329 posts)that you wanted to keep your maiden name.
It just wasn't accepted.
I was happy to change my name because people always mispronounced it and
then they would say, "Oh, you must be .....", fill in a nationality, which I wasn't.
Anyway, nationality was a part of the conversation I never wanted to go to.
But then people mispronounced my new married name, etc.
Exp
(842 posts)sdfernando
(6,045 posts)but a lot aren't because they don't think women, any women, should have the right to vote.
ProudMNDemocrat
(20,731 posts)
Dumb MAGAts!
jgmiller
(680 posts)This just helps their narrative when they lose the election that it was rigged.
durablend
(9,085 posts)Buckeyeblue
(6,295 posts)My wife didn't. We talked about it and decided it's a weird tradition. We're married, not related, so why would want to share last names. We both have family members who send her mail as if she had changed her. We just laugh.