Sounds like Trump is named in the Epstein files

[edhopper]

more than Epstein.

[SheltieLover]

1. Biz mgr?

[Bluetus]

2. LOL :)

Probably not, but check this out
157,613 Leslie Groff, who was Epstein's "Girl Friday." She scheduled everything. She knows everything.
52,781 Richard Kahn, Epstein's accountant who surely knows all about every extortion and money laundering transaction
38,000 DJ Trump, Epstein's child rape and extortion partner
17,783 Darren Indyke, Epstein's personal lawyer
13,169 Ghislaine Maxwell, Trump/Epstein's stop child recruiter and groomer
4,727 Jean-Luc Brunel, another recruiter specializing in French girls and women

Of that entire list, the only one that makes sense is his personal lawyer. And surely much of that is protected by Attorney-Client privilege. But what has the FBI done with the rest of them? Where are the interviews with Groff? Why hasn't she been called to testify before Congress? (Realistically, she would probably be murdered before her moment before the committee. She probably needs to be in Witness Protection, but how do you protect her FROM the DoJ and FBI?)

And it is amazing that Trump is mentioned 3 times as often as Maxwell, who has been convicted as being a full partner.

[Johnny2X2X]

8. Trump is over 1 million

They blocked his name out 950,00+ times. Congress members searched in the unredacted files and got over 1 million hits.

These are the Trump files. He’s the head of the child sec trafficking ring.

[Bluetus]

9. Thanks for that tidbit. I hadn't heard that.

And you know what else hasn't been released and barely gets any mention?

All that kompromat that was the whole point of this Trump/Epstein enterprise. We know that Epstein had a huge cache of videos and pictures, and the FBI surely impounded these. Yet nobody even seems to question why Congress has not received any of that. (I recall months ago, some Reps might have mentions how shocking a few pictures were, but that's all we have ever heard.) I'm not even sure Congress has asked for that, other than to the extent that videos and photos are "documents".

[SomedayKindaLove]

12. Seems more iceberg

Than tidbit

[tinrobot]

19. Named three times more than Maxwell? That says it all.

[bdamomma]

3. Sounds like????

He is in the Epstein files.

[niyad]

14. Read the rest of the sentence.

[jmbar2]

4. You can view all the mentions here in the Epstein files database

One thing that may surprise - none of the mentions, to date, show evidence of Trump amongst the men abusing the young girls with Epstein. References to him are mostly gossip, business related, or political discussions. None too flattering.

Here is what the latest document search engine shows for Trump. Of particular interest is the "Katie Johnson case", which was disseminated by a guy who was a former booker for the Jerry Springer show.
https://epsteinexposed.com/persons/donald-trump

I'm not saying that Trump hasn't done bad stuff to women, but there is no evidence of him doing it in the Epstein files, so far.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/1r3joqr/i_mapped_every_connection_in_the_epstein_files_it/

[edhopper]

5. Of course there aren't any in the released files

They have an army of people redacting and scrubbing them.

[Bluetus]

6. Duh? Which documents do you think Bondi's DoJ is withholding and redacting?

[edhopper]

21. The ones that show

he raped children.

[Bluetus]

22. And the ones that showed he did go to the island

We know Trump wouldn't ever send emails about this, so there probably aren't any first person admissions. But in those million references, the picture will be clear enough.

How many unredacted Trump references are there in the documents that have been released publicly? I know many of those could be benign. But my impression is there aren't many where Trump is clearly identified without redaction. So, what is in those million references?

Trump may not have gone to the Island. He was Epstein's partner. Epstein could have sent young girls to Trump at Mar-a-Lago, Bedminster, Epstein's NYC apartment or anywhere. And there are plenty of other crimes that are probably revealed in those million references, related to money laundering and other things.

[NJCher]

17. Not true that trump hasn't been implicated in the Epstein files

Did you not see the thread posted here that said:

“Witness calls FBI’s [National Threat Operations Center] and reports girl, later found dead, told him Trump and Epstein raped her. DOJ NEVER INTERVIEWS WITNESS. When will DOJ interview this witness?”

Link is at: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100221018522

In this thread are more accusations.

Not enough for you? More:


Just scratching the surface here.

[NJCher]

18. adding link to my above post

More on trump being implicated in the Epstein files.

For whatever reason, I could not get in to edit my post so I could add this link.

[Gaugamela]

7. The Trump-Epstein Files.

[popsdenver]

10. Never missing an opportunity to grift

Trump probably has ALL the names of individuals who were in those files, and is ALREADY blackmailing each and every one of them..........A golden opportunity for his grandest grift ever............
And you have to know, as close as Epstein & Elon were to Putin, he has all the names too. In addition to what he had already collected over the past decades to use as Kompromat......

[NBachers]

11. Epstein is named in the Trump Files.

[bobalew]

13. Perhaps the Trump-Epstein-Bondi Files

She purposely left unredacted Child Porn in the release just so she could see if she could entrap any congress people and it is why she tracked congresses search history. when they reviewed the files.She revictomized a victim and tried to entrap more.
Talk about evil..

She' also is guilty of republishing - distribution of CSAM.

[Codifer]

15. "Onsidering the nature of those files,,

Are we sure that only trumps name is counted and not lumped in with mentions of "prick" and "asshole"?

[struggle4progress]

16. Anybody could be casually mentioned tens of thousands of times in a pedophile ring's records

Surely we can just dismiss this as a harmless coincidence

[Vinca]

20. Just boys being boys.