Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court rejects Trump's bid to deploy National Guard in Illinois
The Trump administration says troops are needed to protect immigration agents in the Chicago area, a move that local officials strongly object to.
Link to tweet
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rejects-trump-bid-deploy-national-guard-illinois-rcna238630
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court on Tuesday rebuffed the Trump administration over its plan to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois over the strenuous objections of local officials.
The court in an unsigned order turned away an emergency request made by the administration, which said the troops are needed to protect federal agents involved in immigration enforcement in the Chicago area.
In doing so, the court at least provisionally rejected the Trump administrations view that the situation on the ground is so chaotic that it justifies invoking a federal law that allows the president to call National Guard troops into federal service in extreme situations.
Those circumstances can include when there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion or the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.
Among the issues in the case is what the term regular forces means, something the Supreme Court focused on in an order issued on Oct. 29 asking for additional briefing. The question is whether the law only allows for the National Guard to be called up if regular military forces are unable to restore order, or whether the phrase refers to law enforcement.
The court in an unsigned order turned away an emergency request made by the administration, which said the troops are needed to protect federal agents involved in immigration enforcement in the Chicago area.
In doing so, the court at least provisionally rejected the Trump administrations view that the situation on the ground is so chaotic that it justifies invoking a federal law that allows the president to call National Guard troops into federal service in extreme situations.
Those circumstances can include when there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion or the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.
Among the issues in the case is what the term regular forces means, something the Supreme Court focused on in an order issued on Oct. 29 asking for additional briefing. The question is whether the law only allows for the National Guard to be called up if regular military forces are unable to restore order, or whether the phrase refers to law enforcement.
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court rejects Trump's bid to deploy National Guard in Illinois (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
17 hrs ago
OP
Maybe, just maybe the justices are realizing the danger they've put themselves in
MarineCombatEngineer
16 hrs ago
#5
LetMyPeopleVote
(174,270 posts)1. Here is a link to the ruling
aeromanKC
(3,801 posts)2. Fuck the 3!!
MustLoveBeagles
(14,512 posts)3. Good 👍
Cha
(316,437 posts)4. Wow.. this is a surprise.. Turing down
Traitor's Attempt to Fuck with Gov Pritzker's State.
TY
MarineCombatEngineer
(17,552 posts)5. Maybe, just maybe the justices are realizing the danger they've put themselves in
by granting near total immunity to Flim Flam Man.
Because of their ruling, Flim Flam Man could have them arrested and removed from the bench and there's not really a thing they can do about it.
Maybe their waking up to this fact.
Hey, a fellow can dream can't they?
Cha
(316,437 posts)6. Well, when you put it that way..
Traitor could do it on a whim just to show how "powerful" he is.. and Turn on former allies like in the blink of his ugly eye.
UTUSN
(76,698 posts)7. K&R for, well well but "preliminary/provisional"
LetMyPeopleVote
(174,270 posts)8. From Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker:

