Question to those who watched:

[RockRaven]

Underneath all of the deranged/addled behavior, grievances, and distraction... was there a hint of anything new that would have justified a national address in the first place (like by a normal administration)?

[malaise]

1. Nothing

Nothing. Nothing

[Klarkashton]

2. It was the state of the union address. He knows

His numbers are in the toilet this is a hail mary.

[BOSSHOG]

3. Absolutely

Distraction from his crimes. Although that’s old news, real old news. Democrats are constantly trying to smear him with the truth. He must counter with lies.

[Alephy]

4. The $1776 to the troops

That was new. At least to me.

Obviously, that does not justify a national address.

[H2O Man]

5. No.

I'll start by saying my cousin called and said he must have told thirty lies. I said I think it was really one, the speech.

The issues were more like what topics one would hear in a state of the union address. This could have waited a month. But some around him have indicated this is his attempted kick-off for mid-term campaigning, despite not being on the ticket. This makes me happy, as I want all republican candidates be associated with him.

[PJMcK]

6. No

It was a self-fellating fiasco.

Actually, it was a waste of 20 minutes of lies and stupidity.