General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums***Breaking *** Appeals Court Upholds Judge Boasberg's Ruling
Per MSNBC

Maeve
(43,170 posts)yowzayowzayowza
(7,051 posts)is on the Orange Turd.
Cha
(309,021 posts)was going for.
TY
paleotn
(20,173 posts)Last edited Wed Mar 26, 2025, 07:49 PM - Edit history (1)
Be careful. Such posts might cause a "stink" with those who seem to possess "perfect foresight and knowledge."
yowzayowzayowza
(7,051 posts)ananda
(31,396 posts)you can guess why.
bucolic_frolic
(49,401 posts)Roberts would be Chief Justice for the impeachment trial.
ReRe
(11,453 posts)To the moon and back!
LetMyPeopleVote
(160,552 posts)The DOJ sought emergency relief from a federal appeals court to let officials summarily deport people under the Alien Enemies Act while litigation continues.
https://bsky.app/profile/msnbc.com/post/3llcnqrddlk2m
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/alien-enemies-act-appeals-court-ruling-trump-rcna197867
Henderson wrote that the government wasn’t entitled to relief at this early stage and that Boasberg entered the restraining orders “for a quintessentially valid purpose: to protect its remedial authority long enough to consider the parties’ arguments.” Millet added that the trial judge “has been handling this matter with great expedition and circumspection, and its orders do nothing more than freeze the status quo until weighty and unprecedented legal issues can be addressed through a soon-forthcoming preliminary injunction proceeding.”
Boasberg didn’t order deportations halted across the board; rather, he temporarily constrained Trump’s authority to summarily deport people under the rarely used act. It was invoked three times before in U.S. history, all during declared wars. The government can still deport people under other legal authorities.
Opposing the government’s attempt to upend Boasberg’s orders, plaintiff lawyers with the American Civil Liberties Union wrote ahead of the hearing that Trump’s “invocation of the Act against a gang cannot be squared with the explicit terms of the statute requiring a declared war or invasion by foreign government.”
They called the implications of Trump’s argument “staggering,” writing that “if the President can designate any group as enemy aliens under the Act, and that designation is unreviewable, then there is no limit on who can be sent to a Salvadoran prison, or any limit on how long they will remain there.”
Boasberg is separately examining whether officials deliberately flouted his orders. Trump called for the judge’s impeachment, after which Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare statement generally condemning such calls, which the president and his allies, including Elon Musk, have made in response to court rulings against the administration.
LetMyPeopleVote
(160,552 posts)I was amazed and please to see a 93 page set of opinions. There are two separate concurrences in favor of the detainees.
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25870610/order-and-opinion-on-attempt-to-block-stay-on-aea-flights.pdf
Only 21 pages of this opinion are from the dissenting judge. I have not read all of the two concurring opinions ruling the right way but did skim the dissenting opinion.
I listened to the oral arguments in this case. I was NOT impressed with the DOJ attorney. The asshole DOJ attorney argued that the only proper cause of action in this matter would be individual habeas corpus actions filed for each individual detainee in the proper court where such plaintiff/detainee is located. Given that the DOJ/trump administration hid the location of these detainees, this would be impossible to do. This means that since the DOJ was successful in hiding the location of these plaintiffs/detainees and not giving these detainees any due process, these plaintiffs are out of luck and must stay in prison in El Salvador.
If the dissenting judge and the DOJ are correct, then the DOJ is being rewarded by hiding the location of the individual detainees and deporting these people before habeas cases could be filed. I find that position to be repugnant.
proud patriot
(101,754 posts)