Stolen Election! - Steven Spoonamore on The Thom Hartmann Program Live (11/18/2024) - 02:16:30 - 02:28:45

[ConcernedCitizen1776]

Steven Spoonamore on The Thom Hartmann Program Live (11/18/2024) - 02:16:30 - 02:28:45 -

The Steven Spoonamore interview starts at approx. 02:16:30 to 02:28:45. [link:https://www.youtube.com/live/5s4iCxtf_Js

https://www.youtube.com/@thomhartmann/videos - https://www.thomhartmann.com/

Data Scientist's Shocking Call for Election Recount Raises Scary Questions! w/ Stephen Spoonamore

[ link: https://wwwDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=RJR5uQpweko ]

Stephen Spoonamore - Duty to Warn Letter - to VP Harris - Re: Election 2024 - Nov 15, 2024 - https://substack.com/home/post/p-151721941

https://freespeechforpeople.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/letter-to-vp-harris-111324.pdf
November 15, 2024
Honorable VP Kamala Harris
The White House
Office of the Vice President
1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington DC 20500
Dear Madam Vice President.
This is my second Duty to Warn Letter regarding hacking of the 2024 Presidential Election. The first letter on November 7 was directed to Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Officials. Both warnings are made per DNI Clapper’s 2015 directive to all agencies and contractors associated with intelligence and financial agency technologies to warn of suspicions of hacking.
Professionally I have worked as the CEO or CTO at seven high technology firms including two which specialized in hacking and counter-hacking operations. My clients have included numerous governments DoD, DHS, Dept. of State, F100 Financials and F500 Industrials.
I am a lifelong Republican who has long placed service and participatory democracy over party. In government, I have twice been invited to SoCom to give lectures on electronic warfare and techniques to find terrorist money laundering and gave a keynote speech of the National Counterintel Summit on this same topic. I served as an after-action reviewer of communications and data failures on 9/11 under the direction of Jim Woolsey and FDNY Commissioner Scopetta, and later co-wrote multiple hacking risk analysis of Smart Grid technologies for the Obama administration.
You should reverse your concession, call for both a full investigation of criminal activity and demand hand recounts in all seven swing states.
In my professional view there are multiple and extremely clear indications the Presidential vote was willfully compromised.
I wholly agree with the public letter of Duncan Buell, et. al. of Nov. 13th stating they believe there is a possibility of hacking and calling for hand-recounts.
https://freespeechforpeople.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/letter-to-vp-harris-111324.pdf
This letter’s clear call to action is commendable, but its cautious tone may belie the severity of what I believe has happened. In my view it is a near certainty the results have been changed at a scale which reversed the US Presidential Election. They imply there is a chance a hand-recount will show you won more votes. I am stating a hand recount will most likely show you did win. Both letters call on you to act.
In my view, a capable and skilled series of exploits, electronic tools and hacks were used to change the Presidential vote in all seven swing states. These activities have reversed the outcomes in at least Arizona, Michigan, North Carolina, and Wisconsin. I will lay out the basics of the attack, starting with unusual elements within the results. I will then outline two processes which could have been followed to insert these false results into the system. Finally I will outline how I would recommend investigating.
Unusual elements within the results.
The results of the attack are improbable in the extreme and well tailored to the sole benefit of your opponent.
Approximately 600,000 votes are for Donald Trump but with no down ballot choices. These are either inserted “bullet ballots” for the Presidential race or manipulated data fields. They are surgically added to totals in limited jurisdictions and within only the seven swing States. This historically unprecedented set of numbers found in the 2024 swing states is absent in every other state. In AZ, MI, NC and WI the effect of these drop-off votes reverses the voters' will and even more improbably always pushes the winning margin beyond the mandatory recount numbers. It is a result too perfect for belief. It is a bespoke and programmed outcome. In other states including PA and NV, removing these strange and bespoke added votes, it appears Donald Trump may have won the cast votes but within a margin which would force recounts. The inserted votes raise his totals, to avoid any scrutiny during mandatory recount results which would have slowed his claim on the Presidency. In GA and FL the same pattern exists with unclear impact on the results.
This attack is not technically difficult. It is modest in scale. It would require:
Modest and common computer programming skills.
Access to 10-100 tabulators or to the handful of facilities programming them in advance.
A credible database of voter IDs of non-voters around which to create false ballots.
Perhaps as few as 1, but more likely 3-5 human program managers.
Access to eBollBook Data during the election to determine who had not voted.
(Possibly) Human access to some tabulators during counting.
If I was asked to lead this hack, I would expect to have a core team of 6-10 people, and operating costs under $10M with a timeline of 3-12 months.
The tell: A historically absurd number of Trump-only bullet ballots or undervote ballots.
There are always a handful of voters who cast a vote in one race which they care about, and do not make other selections on the ballot. These are called bullet ballots. In Presidential Races since 1980, these bullet ballots rarely account for more than 1% of the total votes including in Mr. Trump’s winning 2016 election and losing 2020 election, and when they do it warrants further investigation. In 2024 in the 43 non-swing states, bullet ballots make up a nominal >1%. In the seven swing states the numbers are so high to be unbelievable, unprecedented and demanding of further investigation. Here is analysis from totals as of late Nov. 12th
Here are the unprecedented results of drop-offs in the two western swing states:
AZ - 123K+ 7.2%+ of Trump’s total vote. Enough to reverse the outcome.
NV - 43K+ 5.5%+ of Trump’s total vote. Enough to exceed recount threshold.
It is my belief these two states have illegally added votes.
For comparison, examine Trump’s 2024 results in three states which border AZ and NV. They have equally passionate Trump supporters, but have the normal levels of drop off or bullet ballots.
ID

[Ontheboundry]

1. Devils advocate

If they were inserted only Into swing states but he did better everywhere else also, how does this hold up? I'm a math guy, so show me how that works

[Botany]

2. It was dirty end of story.

A possible provable trial of coordinated cyber attacks @ what very well could have been the central
tabulators? In 1/10 of 1% did people vote a bullet ballot in other states but in the swing states of Arizona
and Nevada 5 to 7% of the total Trump vote was from bullet ballots. And Spoonermore brings in Musk’s, Starlink too.

Btw in 2004 OH Spoonermore was 100% spot on about the use of a “man in the middle” computer
program to store vote data that could then be used as needed to assure a win by w. I know I
saw it on screen captures for Toledo (Lucas County) and Cincinnati (Hamilton County) from
their BOEs and earlier voting returns.

[Abnredleg]

5. Your numbers are wrong

As have been pointed out in numerous threads on DU. As to the Starlink passing voting data, it’s been refuted be by multiple election officials. It was used to connect to voter registration sytems, not to upload voting data.

[Botany]

6. They are not "my #s," they are not wrong, and the possible connections to voting data via Starlink was

… at the Central Tabulators which were reportedly connected to the internet at the state levels.

But we can cross that bridge when we come to it.

[Abnredleg]

8. The numbers are the results of creative math

He took all the votes for Trump and compared them to all the votes for the GOP Senate races in the swing states and came up with those large percentages. This, of course, ignores all the split ticket voting that goes on. To get an accurate count of bullet ballots you need to compare all the votes cast in the presidential races to all the votes cast in a statewide race, either government or senate. When you do, that the percentage of bullet ballots drops to 1-2%. This was pointed out in several thread in which you have participated.

Secondly, there are no “central tabulators” at the state level. The ballots are tabulated at the county or municipal level and then the unofficial numbers are typically manually uploaded to the state’s Board of Elections web site. And, if somehow they got changed at the state level, it would be immediately obvious because the count would differ from the local tabulations. The tabulators can’t connect the internet because they don’t have modems, and they don’t have modems because in all the swing states it is against the law to connect election equipment, including tabulators, to the Internet. Plus, you would then need to explain why the state would design and build an expensive data system to collect voting data over the Internet when connecting to such a system is against the law.

I write this knowing that you are too deep down the rabbit hole to change your mind, but hopefully other readers choose to engage in critical thinking.

[Botany]

9. Your concern is noted.

da i spasibo

[Abnredleg]

10. As is your lack of critical thinking

Snide comments don’t change the fact that you are unable to provide basic facts to support your conspiracies.

[Botany]

11. Your knowledge of American voting, the architecture of our voting systems, and how Mr. Spoonamore ....

compiles and analyzes data is awesome! Do you work with him?

ИИ?

[Abnredleg]

12. No - I use my IT background and common sense /nt

[Botany]

13. I.T. Is short for information technology. Did you know that?

ИИ?

[Abnredleg]

14. Yes, given that I worked in IT

BTW, try Farsi instead of Russian.

[moondust]

3. "bullet ballots"

would seem to make it easier to use the same algorithm/process in multiple states. Delving into down-ballot races in multiple states might get messy.

[Jose Garcia]

4. "Be there, will be wild!"

[tritsofme]

7. You are just posting spam at this point.