General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWilliam Shatner doesn't understand why Harris lost
Link to tweet
It should be noted that he's Canadian and can flee if things get too bad here but he is asking questions that a lot of us have.
JI7
(90,650 posts)the prices we had before . But it mostly means just controlling it increasing more.
Justin Trudeau is alsoi very unpopular for similar reasons but I think they were affected far worse than we were.
DBoon
(23,083 posts)They tried to roll back WWI price inflation.
The actual effect was a decade long economic depression.
https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/5948/economics/uk-economy-in-the-1920s/
canuckledragger
(1,942 posts)Mostly because of non-stop right wing lies about him, and an ignorant populace that doesn't understand how their government works.
The trucker tantrum in Ottawa during the pandemic is a prime example, where idiots were baited and stirred up by outside influences, a few found to come from the US later on, where they tried to scapegoat Trudeau for mask mandates and such they didn't like, not understanding that the mandates were provincial, not federal, and they should've been whining to Doug Ford, the corrupt conservative Premier of Ontario....but because he's one of their own, they don't say boo about him.
A lot of it is also the expected immigrant slandering from the conservatives, racist's favourite punching bag.
jimfields33
(19,134 posts)Seems like hes been prime minister for a long time.
MadameButterfly
(1,749 posts)news--confusing as you said inflation coming down with prices coming down.
They aren't squeezed enough financially to experience the continuing high prices.
They don't have a clue what most people are experiencing. I think this was downplayed even on liberal media because the people in the industry are too well off to really get it.
slightlv
(4,378 posts)they can't understand price fixing vs inflation any better than they can understand "weather" vs climate change. Americans have been told for so long that they're exceptional, they no longer have the ability to think globally... let alone think critically.
newdeal2
(1,010 posts)Unfortunately most voters are misinformed or confused about the issues and have no BS detector apparently.
usonian
(14,053 posts)FBaggins
(27,746 posts)There will be hundreds of explanations from all sides in the coming weeks
Clouds Passing
(2,358 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(2,880 posts)and worships Shatner.
Clouds Passing
(2,358 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(2,880 posts)He cant help himself.
Clouds Passing
(2,358 posts)Deep State Witch
(11,285 posts)Don't get me wrong, I love Uncle Bill. But the dude will do pretty much anything for a buck. Horses and ex-wives are expensive.
nolabear
(43,233 posts)This was about forty years ago. Shatner was obsessed with showing and apparently sucked up pretty hard. He gave my friend a USS Enterprise baseball jacket that she hardly wore because in Louisville, where they lived, old guys always wanted to talk to her about the navy. 🤣
Intractable
(546 posts)Maher can be quite the jerk sometimes.
But, there's a lot of audience to be reached with one's point of view, even if Maher argues with you.
Clouds Passing
(2,358 posts)Elmotime
(10 posts)Right or wrong, it's not surprising for the ultra wealthy to not understand the lives of lower income people.
Keepthesoulalive
(649 posts)Folks should get the bigger picture. The price of eggs is going to be the least of our worries. The economy will be rubble when these idiots finish.
yardwork
(64,465 posts)It was the majority of middle class people who voted for Trump. What's their excuse?
Every person I know who voted for Trump is either rich or very comfortable. Most of them have support from government pensions, too. They've done well and they were doing very well under Biden. Retired early, golfing a lot, buying and selling real estate.
electric_blue68
(18,245 posts)voted for Kamala.
NoRethugFriends
(3,010 posts)OldBaldy1701E
(6,409 posts)I am betting a few years in the gutter would do wonders for their inability to understand lower income people.
But, I digress....
Johonny
(22,103 posts)And his fixes sound awful.
It is almost like most of the swing voters used "the economy" to vote for other reasons. The economy is a good answer when you don't want a poll taker to think you're a racist misogynistic asshole.
ItsjustMe
(11,723 posts)mucifer
(24,864 posts)It would have been nice if he actually publicly endorsed Harris. He had the chance.
SocialDemocrat61
(2,880 posts)So he was never a republican. And some non-Americans dont think it is their place to endorse candidates in another countrys elections.
Ping Tung
(1,314 posts)Ms. Toad
(35,540 posts)And not even relative to any increase in income at the income level where it matters.
And that's the problem. We've treated a good economy level as if it was good for those who live paycheck to paycheck.
groundloop
(12,306 posts)Of course the GQP was able to take advantage of that fact and convince uninformed voters that the economy sucked.
Ms. Toad
(35,540 posts)yardwork
(64,465 posts)Ms. Toad
(35,540 posts)yardwork
(64,465 posts)We lost because a majority of middle class voters did vote, for Trump.
White district managers in sales offices in 45 states, who read spreadsheets and sales reports, who keep up on the emerging trends in their businesses, voted for Trump. They live in big houses, drive big trucks, and go on vacation to all-inclusive resorts. Couldn't be bothered to read Project 2025?
Small town lawyers and CPAs, who provide skilled services to their clients, couldn't understand the "big words" Kamala used?
Selfishness, grievances, resentments, and laziness doomed this country.
Ms. Toad
(35,540 posts)I responded to a specific question, with a factual response.
It was not THE reason but it was A reason. Low-income voters were turned off. Some states home. Some voted for Trump. If you tell people their empty wallets aren't real, and you take their bite for granted, the are going to stop showing. The data shows that is what happened.
If you don't like it, work to change our narrative, rather than continuing to deny the reality that exists for people living paycheck to paycheck
yardwork
(64,465 posts)Did they ever say that? Did they ever deny that reality?
What should they have said?
I know you're good at editing. Could you mark up a transcript of one of Harris's speeches and show us where she went wrong?
kimbutgar
(23,382 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 18, 2024, 01:59 PM - Edit history (1)
The red states wont have the money to help them were going to see a lot more homeless people.
And they cant blame President Biden when this happens under dump.
kiri
(895 posts)"they start getting laid off and can't get eunemployment help because...."
How about if they just stop getting laid?
In red states they can't turn to pot.
calimary
(84,409 posts)And once again, hell have had nothing to do with causing the problem - AND he wont do much in terms of defending himself.
It may be as simple as: Biden is tired. Hes done fighting. Hes battled all his life for the benefit of the little guy, and he knows hes at the end of his political career, and hes just tired.
And frankly, I dont blame him ONE BIT. NOT ONE BIT. Hes probably discouraged by the results of the election, when America chose a human meat grinder for president over a brilliant, informed, and compassionate opponent whose worst and most off-putting sin was being female.
I really feel for President Biden. I bet hes looking back at a lifetime of legislation and work and effort and negotiations and meetings and research and fact-finding and
and wondering, now, if any of that was worth it.
A grateful nation? HAH! Thats what he should be encountering from every direction now. Thats what he deserves, after devoting his life to honest and sincere and selfless service to America. And hes getting none. President Biden DOES NOT deserve that kind of treatment at the end of what should be widely hailed as an amazing and brilliant career based on loyal long-time SERVICE TO AMERICA.
We should all be deeply ashamed of how President Biden is being disrespected on his way out, after a LIFETIME of putting THE PEOPLE first. We wont see a leader like that again - probably for a long time. And now weve got a two-headed monster in trump and Elon Musk, each working hard to assert dominance and prioritizing how HE personally can benefit from it and get even richer than he already is (OR wants you to THINK he is).
CaptainTruth
(7,251 posts)flashman13
(855 posts)Beck23
(211 posts)He also has a pod cast. He will interview Stephen Spoonamore.
LisaM
(28,650 posts)I don't know if it was all due to suppression or voter depression, but certain groups that could have turned didn't.
I will never take Gen Z complaints about previous generations seriously again, since they could have moved the needle with enormous turnout but didn't. Did all Boomers and Xers always turn out or vote correctly? Of course not. And now we can say the same about Gen Z.
Mosby
(17,520 posts)And the youth vote seems to be splitting down gender lines, 18-25 yo men voted for Trump.
groundloop
(12,306 posts)On top of the GQP's normal voter suppression efforts. AND media mostly gave tRUMP a free pass on absolutely everything.
In my most humble opinion Kamala ran a very good campaign, we just got screwed over by the perfect storm of outside influence and ratfuckery.
LisaM
(28,650 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 18, 2024, 09:27 PM - Edit history (1)
that get their news from sources like fucking TikTok.
We have college professors complaining (with good reason, it seems) that they have students in incoming classes who can't read an entire book. And this includes at elite universities.
If true - and I have no reason to believe it isn't, I know a professor at Pomona who says her students are having their papers written by AI and don't actually understand why it's wrong - then the situation is likely far worse with people who don't go to college at all.
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,687 posts)egduj
(850 posts)I'm sure his accountant reported that his investment portfolio has made significant gains .
Unfortunately, we all don't have Star Trek money.
Mosby
(17,520 posts)Maybe cut him some slack.
andym
(5,697 posts)"William Shatner has revealed his life was a mess when Star Trek went off the air in 1969.
The actor who played Captain James Tiberius Kirk in the science fiction television series has revealed he ended up living out of his car because he was so cash-strapped.
A pickup truck, actually, Shatner admitted.
It was the early 1970s and I was recently divorced. I had three kids and was totally broke. I managed to find work back east on the straw-hat circuit summer stock but couldnt afford hotels, so I lived out of the back of my truck, under a hard shell."
----
https://metro.co.uk/2014/02/27/william-shatner-lived-out-of-a-truck-after-star-trek-4324743/
He knows a little about the middle class living.
SocialDemocrat61
(2,880 posts)none of the cast made a lot of money. They rely a lot on conventions, personal appearances, commercials, etc.
KentuckyWoman
(6,891 posts)He was homeless for quite some time after the series ended. Obviously he's doing well now but don't mistake him for an elite.
Intractable
(546 posts)I heard a figure of $2million for Star Trek II, circa 1982.
Kirstie Ally who played Saavik in ST:II, demanded a salary equal to Shatner for ST:III.
The result is that the extremely attractive Robin Curtis was tapped for the role. I'm sure they paid Curtis very little. Shortly after, she did a stint on General Hospital, where I'm sure they paid her very little.
SocialDemocrat61
(2,880 posts)What is the source of that?
The total budget of Star Trek II was $12 million. If Shatner was paid $2 Million, then Nimoy would have been paid that too. Which would mean a third of the budget went to their salaries. Doesnt make sense.
Intractable
(546 posts)ST:II was made on the cheap.
I just got this from Perplexity a minute ago:
William Shatner's salary for Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982) is reported to be around $1.5 million. This amount marked a significant increase from his earnings during the original television series, where he earned about $5,000 per episode in the first season of Star Trek in the 1960s
In the context of the film industry at that time, Shatner's compensation for Star Trek II reflected his growing stature as a leading actor, especially given the franchise's success. By the time of the film's release, Shatner had become synonymous with the character of Captain James T. Kirk, which likely contributed to his higher salary compared to earlier roles.
SocialDemocrat61
(2,880 posts)And would like a more credible source than an AI generator.
Intractable
(546 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(2,880 posts)Its up to you to provide a credible source for it.
Intractable
(546 posts)Enough of this.
SocialDemocrat61
(2,880 posts)You cant prove what you said. OK.
Intractable
(546 posts)SocialDemocrat61
(2,880 posts)You made a claim and cant prove it. Okay.
Intractable
(546 posts)Why must you must pester me about this? Go google it for yourself.
There's an original series Star Trek episode called "Obsession." Maybe you can learn something from it.
SocialDemocrat61
(2,880 posts)because youre unable to prove what you said.
Intractable
(546 posts)That's the most pathetic thing I have read in a long time.
SocialDemocrat61
(2,880 posts)But I dont make claims unless I can provide a credible source to prove.
kelly1mm
(5,276 posts)as they were previously but they are not, as a whole, lowering. Think of it like a ratchet. It can click fast (high inflation) or slow (low inflation) but it only goes one way (prices go up).
Technically there could be deflation where prices across the board really do go down but for a myriad of reasons it is a bad thing.
Think. Again.
(18,285 posts)...being a Black women has nothing to do with the chances of a candidate.
He has practiced lying for so long, it comes out sounding like he means it.
yardwork
(64,465 posts)Think. Again.
(18,285 posts)Response to SocialDemocrat61 (Original post)
CrispyQ This message was self-deleted by its author.
nuxvomica
(12,910 posts)But a white man isn't.
SocialDemocrat61
(2,880 posts)The GOP is the master of identity politics. They appeal to straight, white, Christians, especially men, and tell them that theyll protect them against all those bad other people.
BradBo
(651 posts)orleans
(35,054 posts)swing states
Inside Donald Trump's bizarre birthday speech as he tells voters 'I don't need your vote'
https://www.themirror.com/news/us-news/inside-donald-trumps-bizarre-birthday-539034
Think. Again.
(18,285 posts)SleeplessinSoCal
(9,687 posts)He doesn't know what happened to us. And he is a self-proclaimed news junkie. He knows how Fox News edits out damaging behavior.
It might be the Putinesque "Firehose of Falsehood".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firehose_of_falsehood?wprov=sfla1
Think. Again.
(18,285 posts)SleeplessinSoCal
(9,687 posts)He's a character. Very nice.
kansasobama
(1,526 posts)Let me give you a straight answer. How about 50% of our people are racist, sexist, misogynist and do not care for rule of justice and democracy.
People overvalue us based on history. This is a new era out to destroy our self respect. We are not a great nation.
LilElf70
(466 posts)I don't feel so bad now.
Intractable
(546 posts)Kirk is my boyhood hero.
Things tend to be somewhat black and white for Kirk.
He's not Picard who said in some episode, "It is possible to do everything right, and still get the wrong outcome." Picard gets it.
I hate to say it, but Picard makes a better Captain.
AdamGG
(1,498 posts)He's assuming that the American electorate is basing their decisions on reality.
ThePartyThatListens
(112 posts)Hopefully, he'll come around to it before too long.
Bluethroughu
(5,814 posts)Bullet ballots are 1000% higher than usual in only the swing states.
dai13sy
(481 posts)JohnSJ
(96,654 posts)The choices were very clear, and the face that a sociopath will not occupy the Wh again only highlights just just how bad we are.
There will be consequences, and a lot of people will be hurt before this is over.
Omnipresent
(6,362 posts)Maybe this country really doesnt want a female president?