Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

CrispyQ

(38,245 posts)
2. IDK, but I was kind of surprised Trump's campaign didn't make a bigger issue of that.
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 03:35 PM
Sunday

Maybe they did & I missed it. ???

Self Esteem

(1,667 posts)
4. Because he played to the rustbelt with the steel tariffs.
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 04:15 PM
Sunday

It's the same reason he opposed the sale of US Steel.

Ultimately, didn't matter. States like Pennsylvania and Michigan shifted back to Trump.

Democrats also did way worse among the union vote than they have in previous elections.

ananda

(30,815 posts)
5. And those votes make no sense whatsoever, as do many others.
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 04:18 PM
Sunday

I think it shows us how strongly and widespread the disintegration
of the psyche is now.

In It to Win It

(9,605 posts)
10. and Kamala Harris voted to save their pensions.
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 04:31 PM
Sunday

and even then Teamsters did not make an endorsement.

I read on another forum that Kamala Harris didn't perform any worse with union members, but I've been looking and I haven't found any data showing whether union members shifted to Trump or support remained the same as before.

Self Esteem

(1,667 posts)
15. According to exit polls...
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 04:55 PM
Sunday

Nationally, Biden won the union vote 56-40 over Trump in 2020. Harris won it by 53-45. So, she did three-points worse than Biden and Trump did five-points better than he did in 2020. That's a swing of eight-points.

keep_left

(2,413 posts)
6. Wasn't it mostly (or exclusively) Trump's steel tariffs that they kept?
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 04:20 PM
Sunday

And I think there were some steel tariffs in place even before Trump. The argument was that they were needed on national security grounds, which at least is a good reason. Some of Trump's tariffs were really ill-advised, particularly those on agricultural products.

In It to Win It

(9,605 posts)
8. To protect our domestic green manufacturing industries and semiconductors
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 04:26 PM
Sunday

Biden's entire legislative agenda has been getting manufacturers to build their EV plants, solar plants, wind turbine plants and supporting industries for those here in the USA. In addition to that, I'm sure we all remember the semiconductor chips shortage during the pandemic so he passed the CHIPS Act to get manufacturing of chips in the USA. His tariffs were targeted at building those domestic industries and then protecting them.

In It to Win It

(9,605 posts)
12. Some yes. Some no. Some of the tariffs hurt our farmers because China responded to Trump's tariffs
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 04:37 PM
Sunday

Our farmers lost the Chinese market to Brazilian farmers.

The difference between Trump's strategy and Joe Biden's is that Joe Biden used a stick and carrot approach. Joe Biden incentivized manufacturers to build their plants in the USA with tax credits, subsidies and other financial incentives.

Trump's strategy was all stick and no carrot. Trump placed some tariffs but the effect of that was companies considering Vietnam or India or some other country to diversify their supply chain rather than bringing their plants back to the USA. He scared them away from China (kinda... a little bit) but drove them into the hands of other countries. There was nothing to entice them to come back to the USA.

They had the same idea, but their strategies were entirely different. IMO, Trump's strategy was terrible. Biden took a more diplomatic approach as well, including other countries in his China strategy. Trump just thinks the USA can go at it alone, and his strategy reflects that.

In It to Win It

(9,605 posts)
14. My guess is because the change had already happened. He couldn't undo the effects of China's response
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 04:49 PM
Sunday

Couldn't put the genie back in the bottle

maxrandb

(15,881 posts)
11. This borders on gaslighting
Sun Nov 17, 2024, 04:34 PM
Sunday

The impression being given is that "see, they both had tariffs, so both sides are the same."

It's a quick and simple argument, made for our increasingly quick and simple world.

Of course, President Biden's economic policies and VP Harris' proposed policies are light years different from Donnie Dipshits'.

Kind of like saying Santa and the Unibomber are "the same", because they both deliver packages.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why didnt Biden reverse T...