General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOlga Lautman: How media failed in a nutshell. Who cares about democracy, mass suffering, concentration camps, danger to
US national security, potential arrests of politicians, activists, journalists, etc as long as ratings are good?
Link to tweet
Chuck Todd is getting a well-deserved verbal beating for this on Twitter.
Link to tweet
Blue Owl
(54,755 posts)TomCADem
(17,760 posts)The theme of outrage I see on DU regarding why Trump won is based on an outdated understanding of where millions of Americans get their news and information, which is social media. Unlike traditional journalism, there is no vetting of stories, particularly stories that are recommended, based on accuracy. To the contrary, stories are recommended based on propensity to click, which favors outrageous, emotionally laden, conspiracy filled stories. Thus, the more outrageous and detached a candidate is, particularly when they are supported by a cult like following, the more likely misinformation will spread as was the case in Philippines.
Worse, with social media, there is no warning that indicates the social media recommendations are not based on accuracy or reliability even though you would normally believe that a recommendation would be based on accuracy. There is no disclosure regarding the ranking algorithm that social media platforms use. Indeed, many users of social media are under the assumption that social media is more reliable, because it is based on their own searches, because they do not know the basis for why certain stories are recommended and pushed.
https://www.nationthailand.com/blogs/perspective/40015561
* * *
To say that Marcos Jr won the presidential election by using social media as a propaganda tool is no exaggeration.
Bongbong masterminded a years-long strategic campaign on social media that has helped rebuild and polish his familys image. Pro-Marcos propaganda has proliferated on social media from glossy TikTok clips showing fun times during the Marcos era to YouTube videos declaring there was no martial law.
An official from political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica reportedly said it was approached by Marcos Jr to delete unfavourable records of the Marcos regime on social media platforms so he could gain momentum in the election.
onecaliberal
(35,835 posts)Dont give a fuck what the fascists are doing.
tanyev
(44,517 posts)TomCADem
(17,760 posts)The growth in misogyny and racism through social media is not an accident, but is due to a deliberate effort to leverage the algorithm to appeal to young men looking for ways to seduce and dominate women by being an alpha male and how to make a quick buck. Yet, progressives still think the reason why they lost is because of some random statement by Chuck Todd.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/06/andrew-tate-violent-misogynistic-world-of-tiktok-new-star
His rapid surge to fame was not by chance. Evidence obtained by the Observer shows that followers of Tate are being told to flood social media with videos of him, choosing the most controversial clips in order to achieve maximum views and engagement.
The coordinated effort, involving thousands of members of Tates private online academy Hustlers University and a network of copycat accounts on TikTok, has been described by experts as a blatant attempt to manipulate the algorithm and artificially boost his content. In less than three months, the strategy has earned him a huge following online and potentially made him millions of pounds, with 127,000 members now paying the £39 a month to join Hustlers University community, many of them men and boys from the UK and US.
Yet despite much of the content appearing to break TikToks rules, which explicitly ban misogyny and copycat accounts, the platform appears to have done little to limit Tates spread or ban the accounts responsible. Instead, it has propelled him into the mainstream allowing clips of him to proliferate, and actively promoting them to young users.
highplainsdem
(52,382 posts)Cha
(305,431 posts)himself Again.
TomCADem
(17,760 posts)These posts themselves are an example of why Democrats and progressives lost. They fail to see that most Americans do not get their news or information from social media. Thus, by attacking traditional media, and ignoring the rapid growth of social media influencers like Andrew Tate or Joe Rogan, they just hasten the failure of media that they bemoan.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/11/10/trump-voters-gen-z-memes-podcasts-joe-rogan/
Trump flexed his arms with podcasting National Football League players and chatted about aliens with YouTube wrestler Logan Paul. He served the Nelk Boys Chick-fil-A on his private jet Trump Force One, calling the group of YouTube pranksters a modern-day Johnny Carson. He riffed on surviving a July assassination attempt with the four-man comedy team behind Flagrant, a raunchy podcast that promises to deliver unruly hot takes directly to your dome piece.
The resulting memes, TikTok posts and YouTube videos landed Trump millions of views online part of a sprawling online strategy that gave him a direct line to a giant fan base of young American men.
While many political strategists once viewed this group as liberal by default, young men between the ages of 18 and 29 swung enormously for Trump, shifting rightward by eight percentage points since 2020, according to network exit polls.