General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary forgot to acknowledge my demographic directly in her Advertising.
Last edited Mon Sep 4, 2023, 06:36 PM - Edit history (1)
On this forum, I and at least one other DU member warned about this before the election.
We were saturated with Hillary Ads.
They almost all had the same message or two.
I believe they all had tinges of fairness for minorities or women.
That messages was saturated.
That message led to a better country for everyone.
But, there was never, not even once that I remember, a message that left her other message or 2 out of it.
There was no Ad that spoke to concepts that would improve the life of a middle age white man, besides the effects of the main messages already mentioned.
I think it was a big mistake.
delisen
(7,366 posts)I
GoodRaisin
(10,922 posts)Tanuki
(16,448 posts)getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)You weren't paying attention.
You didn't need coddling. You didn't need reassurance. You weren't in any kind of danger; not physical, not psychological, not legal. You were financially secure. You weren't being arrested just because of who you were. You weren't paid less because of who you were.
You were the master of your destiny. Did someone forget to stroke your feefees? I'm so sorry.
I'm a 65 year old white dude. I've never had to wonder why I lost a job, or got pulled over. I've never been hit on inappropriately in the workplace. I've been laid off at least 5 times, and always was able to find another job and end up making more in the long run.
I don't need a politician to tell me it will be ok. I need them to tell me democracy will survive, and my daughter will have the same rights my wife and I do, as well as those of anyone living in this country. I want them to tell me how everyone will have all the advantages I've had, and how everyone will have affordable Healthcare and housing and be free from police brutality.
So no, I don't care I didn't get a pat on the head. I got so much more. You just weren't listening.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)Listen to what the OP said, "That message led to a better country for everyone."
It's not about what I or you need, it is about getting votes.
You mention,
Women's rights
Democracy survival
Police conduct
Healthcare
Housing affordability
Funny that another Clinton's campaign advisor said, "it's the economy stupid"
Telling people there will be a chicken in every pot, might help during some elections.
karynnj
(60,968 posts)I know I should not speak for my white then middle aged husband, but here goes. I KNOW he cared about women's rights and did so before he married me and had three brilliant daughters. Democracy's survival is not just for women, minorities, but for everyone. Police conduct is important for everyone - even if you are not targeted. Not to mention, he has friends who fit in less privileged categories. As to healthcare, everyone's health is better when everyone has access to decent healthcare, not to mention as a good person, even though we had healthcare through an employer, we cared that some in one of the richest countries in the world didn't. The same for housing affordability.
ANYONE who cares for people other than themselves would have thought those issues were important. As to the economy, the Obama/Biden administration's had dealt with the financial mess that exploded in 2008. Many actions were taken to improve the economy and they did work.
It is very hard to campaign as the incumbent party on improving the economy and toting the achievements was difficult, as there were many still struggling. You say that telling people that there will be a chicken in every pot, begs the question of whether the Obama administration failed if that were not true.
By the way, did you vote or did you stay home because she did not speak to you.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)The chicken in a pot was qualified with "during some elections."
I meant it in a more general sense that promoting hope for an abundant economic future for everyone will help get votes.
Now, those that DON'T care for things you mention in your first paragraph wouldn't vote for us anyway.
But some that do, and might still be on the fence of who to vote for.
There was an extreme amount of advertising on a couple of points.
In my opinion, those advertisements had already achieved their purpose.
I felt some of my demographic would underestimate just how big those discrimination concepts are and need a little more reason to vote Blue.
So, an advertisement that highlighted direct benefit that didn't involve race, gender of poverty would go a long way toward driving a few more white people, especially white men, to the polls.
Mossfern
(4,716 posts)The most important issue is getting votes, and campaigns should be directly relevant to every voter. Caring about "A" doesn't mean you don't care about "B", but speaking to issues that directly relate to "B" just may be the tipping point to get his vote.
I think it's quite simple. I'm a woman living in a Metropolitan area, worked in distressed,urban areas and came of age before Roe v. Wade and still think that white middle class men hearing how a candidate will help them personally will help capture that vote. That is what winning elections is about!
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)A great point in your post is when you said, "and still think".
lol, I know I'm taking it a little out of context, but this is all about "thinking".
It is not about me.
Mossfern
(4,716 posts)getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)The constant Drip Drip Drip from wikilesks, the constant schedule of overblown hyped up hearings in the house and senate, the Russian troll farms blasting out demographically targeted messages getting you to believe you were being ignored, the fbi conducting real witch hunts, and the media spinning everything into hyperbolic absurdity.
The truth is the economy wasn't ignored in the campaign. White men weren't ignored. We just weren't center stage, and we didn't need to be.
betsuni
(29,078 posts)DFW
(60,186 posts)HRC's campaign came at a time when Obama had left us in much better shape. The media focused on Trump's BS because they needed a story to hype, and the economy was no longer it.
Trump was able to get away with his BS because the time of the country hurting from Republican economic nonsense was practically forgotten after 8 years of Obama-Biden. Trump and his clowns reminded everyone what happens to our economy under Republican rule, but only after they got into power. The 2020 election was marked by five million people saying "oops, not this time!" all on the same day.
betsuni
(29,078 posts)ecstatic
(35,075 posts)that is not covered by the messages targeted to women and/or minorities?
And would the message that older white men need to hear offend or alienate the other members of the base?
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)ecstatic
(35,075 posts)Is it a specific topic that wasn't covered or was it more superficial, like a lack of older white men in her TV / online ads?
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)Please look at post 5 for a possible beginning of an answer.
By me response there, it would seem that perhaps an economic message was being missed.
Perhaps there could have been a "get rid of nuclear weapons" message, or perhaps that is only in my dreams.
Likely, a greater emphasis on economics.
But, like I say, I'm not reliving enough to want to try to say what the messaging should have been, beyond letting you know that the messaging failed in the way my OP is titled.
Thanks for your patience with me.
DURHAM D
(33,054 posts)Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)Im a middle aged white man and Hillary spoke to me just fine. White men shouldnt require coddling.
triron
(22,240 posts)senseandsensibility
(24,974 posts)We may think that white males should be able to see that Dem policies are best for them. And some of them do get that message. The majority don't, for whatever reason. And they're a HUGE voting block. We don't live in an age of subtle nuance. We need to spell it out. And I don't want to offend anyone, but many white males practically need to be hit over the head with messages because the propaganda from the other side is so loud. So if we want their votes, we have to say things that seem very obvious to us. Democrats brought you the week-end, medicare, social security, etc. They honestly don't know that. It's frustrating, I agree, and they should know it. But we have to deal with reality here.
Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)Not a single of these goals excluded middle aged white men. Nor did they exclude any minority. Nor did they single out any group.
Even items like "racial justice" include white middle aged men: it speaks of equal justice for all, including white middle aged men. All of them, without exception,are the concepts that would, and did, improve the life of middle age white men.
If course, certain middle age white men who are routinely affordeded certain privileges that come with their age, race and gender, might erroneously interpret equality as discrimination.
LeftInTX
(34,295 posts)People often vote based on commercials.
It probably would have helped to have a few white middle aged men in her commercials.
Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)even more male oriented. Didn't stop women from voting for them.
But I would like to see an example of what you are talking about. Anything you can cite?
Hekate
(100,133 posts)LeftInTX
(34,295 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)Easterncedar
(6,267 posts)Of course folks said they felt left out. Some of these would seize any excuse not to vote for a woman/democrat, some were played by the right into manufactured outrage and alienation. And so on. But cant we at least thoughtfully examine the campaigns to see if we might be able bring back some of the alienated?
mercuryblues
(16,413 posts)They could never vote for Hillary/female president. They were afraid she would nuke another country when she was on her period,
I kid you not.
Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)or spend a little time on the websites they frequent, you would know that a fair percentage of them believe the Clintons have murdered hundreds of people. I mean they have lists of them. They really believe it, and no political commercial is going to change that.
And that's only one of the things that they believe, thanks to the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.
In order to do all the evil they are accused of, 1,000's of people would have to be involved. Someone would have told by now. They have investigated the Clinton's to no end. Hell' the even investigated Sock's the Cat. And their Christmas card list.
Nothing, nadda to indict them on.
treestar
(82,383 posts)so ignorant! She doesn't get those anymore! (Me neither, and I love it!)
mercuryblues
(16,413 posts)There is just no fixing stoopid
treestar
(82,383 posts)definitely can't fix that level of stupid!
mercuryblues
(16,413 posts)Trump: I like stupid people
Kaleva
(40,365 posts)That was awhile ago and I don't recall seeing them
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)Take the boasting that I "warned" out of the equation.
That is not what is important here.
Kaleva
(40,365 posts)And still made your point
GoodRaisin
(10,922 posts)There was plenty in Hillarys campaign messages that would have helped white guys. I dont understand the context comment though.
mercuryblues
(16,413 posts)I can't vote for her now.
JFC, Get over yourself.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)yardwork
(69,364 posts)mercuryblues
(16,413 posts)So predictable of a white male whining that he didn't get special treatment. A woman didn't defer to his wants. Why he is Defamed! LOL.
dpibel
(3,944 posts)Not sure that word means what you think it means.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)That is exactly as I meant it.
dpibel
(3,944 posts)right away, then!
I'm pretty sure that you can find someone to take this case.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)W_HAMILTON
(10,333 posts)Srkdqltr
(9,760 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)Personally, I say: God bless Hillary Clinton. Shes fought the good fight her whole life.
Srkdqltr
(9,760 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)
dropped in to a diner and shook my actual hand in my personal home town in the most populous state in the nation. I mean Jesus Christ on a trailer hitch, how hard would it be for them to find me in a state of 40 million people? The sheer arrogance of those Democrats! How can I, the personally insulted and overlooked, even be asked to care about the rest of the country?
As someone else asked upthread: Just remind us who were you at DU during Hillary Clintons campaign against Trump?
dpibel
(3,944 posts)Is there a reason anyone should care very deeply about your vague recollections of the advertising strategies of a campaign that ended 7/10 of a decade ago?
Or is Hillary running again and I haven't heard about it?
edisdead
(3,396 posts)dpibel
(3,944 posts)but I just can't quite call it to mind.
Getting a fast moving thread this big isn't a job for amateurs, you know.
riversedge
(80,810 posts)hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)Why? Former SOS Clinton is running for nothing. Nor is she running/involved in Biden's reelection campaign. Nor is her strategy specifically adopted by Biden-Harris in 2024 any more than it was in 2020.
So, why the fixation on 2016 and HRC? And why do you seemingly have no concern for anyone BUT middle age white men? I care about everyone especially the working class and the poor--regardless of gender, gender identity, race, ethnicity, or any other immutable factor. Most Democrats DO likewise.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)An article on CNN prompted me, it said, "The roster of swing states that both sides can genuinely hope to win may be as small next year as at any point in modern history"
What's past is prologue.
If you fail to learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it.
I joined this forum when Obama was running, because I thought an idea I had would help get him elected.
I figured the best way to possibly let my thoughts bubble up to those that actually process the ideas, would be to post to this forum.
There are lessons to be learned.
That is the why. It's no coincidence that I have posted this. lol
You said, "why do you seemingly have no concern for anyone BUT middle age....".
This is what let me see that you missed focus.
Reread the OP, and my others in this thread as well, and you will see that it never "seems" like I lack concern.
I want to help win the elections for us.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)That means it is YOU who is not serious about positive discussion of strategy for the next election. And, it has not gone unnoticed that you are focusing on HRC and not the last Presidential--2020 election. Peculiar since the candidate in 2020 and his strategy is the one you SHOULD be seeking to influence--given Joe Biden is the likely candidate for reelection in 2024.
This tells me and many others here one thing and that is that your intent is merely to complain and bemoan, deride, and diminish Hillary Clinton. My, how reminiscent this is of some other websites...
Response to hlthe2b (Reply #48)
Post removed
Hekate
(100,133 posts). it makes for his 3rd hide. Interesting.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)It was a generally polite response to me, however, but they may have said something about another DUer. I only glanced at it, having decided to leave the discussion.
blogslug
(39,167 posts)An older white man named Joe Biden is.
I hope you will vote accordingly.
StevieM
(10,578 posts)She had massive advertising campaigns and GOTV operations in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Larger than the ones Obama had in 2012.
The was one state, Wisconsin, where she did not schedule any rallies after the primaries. I doubt that even cost her Wisconsin, and it certainly did not cost her the election.
2016 was all about exactly what it appeared to be about--the fake email controversy. And James Comey dominated that race from start to finish.
The only people that still have Hillary fried into their brains at this point are rightwingers and Horseshoe leftwingers. Given the stale talking point about how she didn't campaign enough in Midwestern states -- I mean, the fucking convention was in one of those states, her last campaign rally before the election was in one of those states, etc. -- is often brought up by Jill Stein voters looking to blame someone else for their dumb fucking decision not to vote for the candidate running on "the most progressive platform" in Democratic history (Bernie Sanders's words), I can guess which one applies here.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,211 posts)I edited out any mention of Midwestern states
I only mentioned that because I felt I needed to humble my pronouncement of a "big mistake"
I was trying to minimize what I was pointing out.
BTW, someone mentions that there are talking points by some about this issue to spread a false impression, so it is no wonder that I had "heard" it. And I did say, "if so".
Where the campaign focused is not the issue I want to make anyway, so I edited that part out of the OP.
Thanks for the knowledge.
Mossfern
(4,716 posts)considering that we're all on the same "team."
I honestly thought that this forum was a civil one.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Perhaps the question should be: how can we attract and keep the following fringe far-lefties in our camp? The ones whove been amazingly clever at working the margins of the Electoral College
* Bernie Dolores Huerta should just stfu Bros (not the Senator, just the residual Bros)
* Jill Putins dinner Stein voters
* Susan Trumps election will bring on the glorious revolution Sarandon voters
* Cornell tear the Democratic Party down because I never got my due from the first Black president West voters
Or maybe the question should be, how can we work around these useless fringe people and neuter their influence.
Mossfern
(4,716 posts)It was not an attack on Hillary herself.
Constructive criticism is not an attack.
Heckate, your perception what needed/ still needs to be done stands absolutely true.
I do think that there's a great amount of miscommunication here and hostility will not bring us very close together - even weaken us if we don't have clear communication.
The Democratic needs to court as many people as possible - any hostility among weakens us.
Pardon me if I sound a bit incomprehensible myself - it's 2:30 in the morning and was awakened by pain.
think that Hillary herself would not have found his post offensive.
betsuni
(29,078 posts)Hekate
(100,133 posts)Theres nothing like insomnia caused by pain. Take care of yourself & rest
ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)What would have made that demographic feel valued enough?
LeftInTX
(34,295 posts)Talk about union jobs and wages.
ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)Being pro-union is a Democratic stronghold. It was and is definitely highlighted in the platform
tavernier
(14,443 posts)Good morning. Hillary is not running in this election. Russia saw to her loss in her last election. We have discovered much and worked out some of those kinks, not all. But the Republican Party is in a shambles so we have hope that many are coming to their senses. Oh and by the way, there is a group out there called the Proud Boys. They are basically white males who fear that their girlfriends will prefer to date people of color, or Jews, or anyone smarter or more attractive. So they tried to bully the country to elect a president who would be simpatico to their desires. Most of them are in jail now, and the rest are on their way. So much for white males who were overlooked or misunderstood.
And now you are caught up.
Pathwalker
(6,603 posts)attention was personally paid to you SEVEN years ago by a woman. Do I have this right?
Skittles
(171,715 posts)Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)betsuni
(29,078 posts)Because of Identity Politics.
The Dangerous Myth That Hillary Clinton Ignored the Working Class:
"Hillary Clinton talked about the working class, middle-class jobs, and the dignity of work constantly. And she still lost. She detailed plans to help coal miners and steel workers. She had decades of ideas to help parents, especially working moms, and their children. She had plans to help young men who were getting out of prison and for old men who were getting into new careers. She talked about the dignity of manufacturing jobs ... . ... She offered the most comprehensively progressive economic platform of any presidential candidate in history ... ." The word "jobs" was the most frequent word in her speeches.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/12/hillary-clinton-working-class/509477/
Hillary forgot my demographic --
Oopsie Daisy
(6,670 posts)>> Hillary forgot my demographic --
I know. Crazy, right? Now, obviously I can't speak to this poster's motivation or reasons, but I can tell you that I've heard similar admonishments (attacks) against Hillary from others on the Internet, and each time it was being offered-up as someone's excuse, or justification, for being like Sarandon or Turner and voting for Stein instead of Hillary.
betsuni
(29,078 posts)Democratic Party cannot talk to where I come from" ... what? What fictional Democratic Party is that?
jcgoldie
(12,046 posts)They want their slighted white guy beef back. For fuck's sake. Find something else to blame Hillary Clinton for its motherfucking 2023!
betsuni
(29,078 posts)niyad
(132,440 posts)betsuni
(29,078 posts)I and one other person warned about this
We were saturated
In her Advertising
Hillary Ads
Tinges of fairness for minorities and women
Saturated, that messages
But there was never a message that left her other message 2 out of it
That spoke to concepts
The life of a middle aged white man
Hillary forgot my demographic
A big mistake
Saturated
Hillary forgot
The life of a middle aged white man
lapucelle
(21,061 posts)Recycle_Guru
(2,973 posts)you should be happy with Biden's message, then