Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DontBelieveEastisEas

(1,211 posts)
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 03:20 PM Sep 2023

Hillary forgot to acknowledge my demographic directly in her Advertising.

Last edited Mon Sep 4, 2023, 06:36 PM - Edit history (1)

On this forum, I and at least one other DU member warned about this before the election.

We were saturated with Hillary Ads.
They almost all had the same message or two.
I believe they all had tinges of fairness for minorities or women.
That messages was saturated.
That message led to a better country for everyone.

But, there was never, not even once that I remember, a message that left her other message or 2 out of it.
There was no Ad that spoke to concepts that would improve the life of a middle age white man, besides the effects of the main messages already mentioned.

I think it was a big mistake.

91 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary forgot to acknowledge my demographic directly in her Advertising. (Original Post) DontBelieveEastisEas Sep 2023 OP
What name did you post under in 2016? nt delisen Sep 2023 #1
Good question. GoodRaisin Sep 2023 #83
Excellent question, still being evaded. I wonder why? Tanuki Sep 2023 #88
Dear Michael moore.... getagrip_already Sep 2023 #2
I was listening, I was interested in winning the election. DontBelieveEastisEas Sep 2023 #5
Are you saying that white men did not care about those issues? karynnj Sep 2023 #12
This is not about me, I'm too small of a sample size. DontBelieveEastisEas Sep 2023 #19
I agree with you completely Mossfern Sep 2023 #29
I love how you think. DontBelieveEastisEas Sep 2023 #42
Exactly Mossfern Sep 2023 #49
The election had much more to do with..... getagrip_already Sep 2023 #68
+1 betsuni Sep 2023 #72
"It's the economy, stupid!" was from a time when Reagan-Bush left the economy a shambles DFW Sep 2023 #86
+1 betsuni Sep 2023 #62
What type of message would that group need to hear ecstatic Sep 2023 #3
Good points. I'm not reliving it well enough right now to expound. nt DontBelieveEastisEas Sep 2023 #6
I'm not disagreeing just genuinely curious ecstatic Sep 2023 #11
I understood your post exactly as you describe DontBelieveEastisEas Sep 2023 #15
Why am I thinking about the game "Poor Pussy"? nt DURHAM D Sep 2023 #4
Oh, please. Elessar Zappa Sep 2023 #7
Me too. triron Sep 2023 #74
I look at it this way senseandsensibility Sep 2023 #8
I just checked Hillary's Vision for America list of goals she set for herself Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #9
Her commercials were very female oriented LeftInTX Sep 2023 #10
Without any research, I would venture a guess that the commercials of her male challengers were Beastly Boy Sep 2023 #13
Well, we are 51% of the population Hekate Sep 2023 #63
Well, they are 49%...She won the popular vote! LeftInTX Sep 2023 #64
Yep. A clear majority of everybody preferred Hillary to Mango Mussolini. Hekate Sep 2023 #67
Can we think about how we positively connect? Easterncedar Sep 2023 #14
I actually heard a relative say mercuryblues Sep 2023 #18
And if you talk to these people, Mr.Bill Sep 2023 #22
IKR mercuryblues Sep 2023 #26
lol treestar Sep 2023 #28
I didn't correct her. mercuryblues Sep 2023 #30
to top it off, it's a "her?" treestar Sep 2023 #31
Yes. mercuryblues Sep 2023 #33
Could you provide links to your warnings? Kaleva Sep 2023 #16
It was mentioned just for context, to set the mood and understanding. DontBelieveEastisEas Sep 2023 #20
I think you could have left out the 1st sentence entirely Kaleva Sep 2023 #76
Huh? That doesn't make any sense. GoodRaisin Sep 2023 #85
Hillary didn't mention me by name, WAAaaaaahhhhhh! mercuryblues Sep 2023 #17
It seems you are trying to defame me DontBelieveEastisEas Sep 2023 #21
That's adorable Hekate Sep 2023 #25
But consistent. yardwork Sep 2023 #78
LOL. Play the victim, when called out on your BS. mercuryblues Sep 2023 #27
Might want to check the dictionary dpibel Sep 2023 #34
1) law : to harm the reputation of by communicating false statements about DontBelieveEastisEas Sep 2023 #35
You best betake yourself to a lawyer dpibel Sep 2023 #39
Which is kind of what you did to Hillary in your OP. Also, refighting a primary, & bashing a Dem. Hekate Sep 2023 #40
And here we go... W_HAMILTON Sep 2023 #45
I didn't know she was running this time. Srkdqltr Sep 2023 #23
In some people's heads, she never goes away. Even in the grave, they will kick her. Hekate Sep 2023 #32
Yep. I was amazed by the number and passions in the answer posts. Srkdqltr Sep 2023 #36
Hey man, it was a total deal-breaker for me that major Dem candidates never once, not once, ... Hekate Sep 2023 #24
Did you know that 2016 was 7 years ago? dpibel Sep 2023 #37
Is this a joke? Seriously? edisdead Sep 2023 #38
I think there's another word for it... dpibel Sep 2023 #43
I looked for a date on it. Then gave up. Not worth it IMHO riversedge Sep 2023 #52
Generally relitigating the last election is frowned upon & you are going back to 2016--2 cycles ago hlthe2b Sep 2023 #41
At first I wanted to respond to your post, but then realized you are not focused DontBelieveEastisEas Sep 2023 #47
I note you are accusing DUers of "defaming" you upstream just because they disagree. hlthe2b Sep 2023 #48
Post removed Post removed Sep 2023 #51
If that was the OP responding to you... Hekate Sep 2023 #66
Yes. It was. hlthe2b Sep 2023 #69
Hillary Clinton is not running for president in 2024 blogslug Sep 2023 #44
She absolutely did target all the midwestern battleground states. StevieM Sep 2023 #46
Yep. W_HAMILTON Sep 2023 #54
edited OP DontBelieveEastisEas Sep 2023 #56
+1 betsuni Sep 2023 #60
I'm wondering why I sense so much hostility in this thread Mossfern Sep 2023 #50
A lot of us are wondering why the OP wrote something so hostile to Hillary Clinton, by name,... Hekate Sep 2023 #55
+1 betsuni Sep 2023 #61
It was a criticism of her campaign tactics, or to be more precise; her advisors Mossfern Sep 2023 #82
What campaign tactics? betsuni Sep 2023 #84
We'll talk more later Hekate Sep 2023 #87
So. How would you go about acknowledging middle-aged White males in a political ad? ismnotwasm Sep 2023 #53
Show people working in factories. LeftInTX Sep 2023 #65
I recall this being done. ismnotwasm Sep 2023 #70
Dear Rip Van Winkle tavernier Sep 2023 #57
Wait a minute - you, a white man, are complaining that not enough Pathwalker Sep 2023 #58
I thought this had to be a joke Skittles Sep 2023 #77
... Sky Jewels Sep 2023 #59
Old attack resurrected: Democrats Have No Economic Message, Ignore White Working/Middle Class betsuni Sep 2023 #71
I know. Crazy, right? Oopsie Daisy Sep 2023 #73
Someone says, "I come from the white working class and I am deeply humiliated that the betsuni Sep 2023 #75
2016 called jcgoldie Sep 2023 #79
... betsuni Sep 2023 #80
Did I miss an announcement that Hillary is running in this cycle? niyad Sep 2023 #81
Hillary Forgot. A poem. betsuni Sep 2023 #89
I like the way you worked in "saturated" twice. lapucelle Sep 2023 #90
give it a rest dude Recycle_Guru Sep 2023 #91

getagrip_already

(17,802 posts)
2. Dear Michael moore....
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 03:50 PM
Sep 2023

You weren't paying attention.

You didn't need coddling. You didn't need reassurance. You weren't in any kind of danger; not physical, not psychological, not legal. You were financially secure. You weren't being arrested just because of who you were. You weren't paid less because of who you were.

You were the master of your destiny. Did someone forget to stroke your feefees? I'm so sorry.

I'm a 65 year old white dude. I've never had to wonder why I lost a job, or got pulled over. I've never been hit on inappropriately in the workplace. I've been laid off at least 5 times, and always was able to find another job and end up making more in the long run.

I don't need a politician to tell me it will be ok. I need them to tell me democracy will survive, and my daughter will have the same rights my wife and I do, as well as those of anyone living in this country. I want them to tell me how everyone will have all the advantages I've had, and how everyone will have affordable Healthcare and housing and be free from police brutality.

So no, I don't care I didn't get a pat on the head. I got so much more. You just weren't listening.

DontBelieveEastisEas

(1,211 posts)
5. I was listening, I was interested in winning the election.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 03:58 PM
Sep 2023

Listen to what the OP said, "That message led to a better country for everyone."

It's not about what I or you need, it is about getting votes.

You mention,
Women's rights
Democracy survival
Police conduct
Healthcare
Housing affordability

Funny that another Clinton's campaign advisor said, "it's the economy stupid"


Telling people there will be a chicken in every pot, might help during some elections.

karynnj

(60,968 posts)
12. Are you saying that white men did not care about those issues?
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:21 PM
Sep 2023

I know I should not speak for my white then middle aged husband, but here goes. I KNOW he cared about women's rights and did so before he married me and had three brilliant daughters. Democracy's survival is not just for women, minorities, but for everyone. Police conduct is important for everyone - even if you are not targeted. Not to mention, he has friends who fit in less privileged categories. As to healthcare, everyone's health is better when everyone has access to decent healthcare, not to mention as a good person, even though we had healthcare through an employer, we cared that some in one of the richest countries in the world didn't. The same for housing affordability.

ANYONE who cares for people other than themselves would have thought those issues were important. As to the economy, the Obama/Biden administration's had dealt with the financial mess that exploded in 2008. Many actions were taken to improve the economy and they did work.

It is very hard to campaign as the incumbent party on improving the economy and toting the achievements was difficult, as there were many still struggling. You say that telling people that there will be a chicken in every pot, begs the question of whether the Obama administration failed if that were not true.

By the way, did you vote or did you stay home because she did not speak to you.

DontBelieveEastisEas

(1,211 posts)
19. This is not about me, I'm too small of a sample size.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:46 PM
Sep 2023

The chicken in a pot was qualified with "during some elections."
I meant it in a more general sense that promoting hope for an abundant economic future for everyone will help get votes.

Now, those that DON'T care for things you mention in your first paragraph wouldn't vote for us anyway.

But some that do, and might still be on the fence of who to vote for.
There was an extreme amount of advertising on a couple of points.
In my opinion, those advertisements had already achieved their purpose.

I felt some of my demographic would underestimate just how big those discrimination concepts are and need a little more reason to vote Blue.
So, an advertisement that highlighted direct benefit that didn't involve race, gender of poverty would go a long way toward driving a few more white people, especially white men, to the polls.

Mossfern

(4,716 posts)
29. I agree with you completely
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:24 PM
Sep 2023

The most important issue is getting votes, and campaigns should be directly relevant to every voter. Caring about "A" doesn't mean you don't care about "B", but speaking to issues that directly relate to "B" just may be the tipping point to get his vote.

I think it's quite simple. I'm a woman living in a Metropolitan area, worked in distressed,urban areas and came of age before Roe v. Wade and still think that white middle class men hearing how a candidate will help them personally will help capture that vote. That is what winning elections is about!

DontBelieveEastisEas

(1,211 posts)
42. I love how you think.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:34 PM
Sep 2023

A great point in your post is when you said, "and still think".
lol, I know I'm taking it a little out of context, but this is all about "thinking".
It is not about me.

getagrip_already

(17,802 posts)
68. The election had much more to do with.....
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 07:29 PM
Sep 2023

The constant Drip Drip Drip from wikilesks, the constant schedule of overblown hyped up hearings in the house and senate, the Russian troll farms blasting out demographically targeted messages getting you to believe you were being ignored, the fbi conducting real witch hunts, and the media spinning everything into hyperbolic absurdity.

The truth is the economy wasn't ignored in the campaign. White men weren't ignored. We just weren't center stage, and we didn't need to be.

DFW

(60,186 posts)
86. "It's the economy, stupid!" was from a time when Reagan-Bush left the economy a shambles
Tue Sep 5, 2023, 03:49 AM
Sep 2023

HRC's campaign came at a time when Obama had left us in much better shape. The media focused on Trump's BS because they needed a story to hype, and the economy was no longer it.

Trump was able to get away with his BS because the time of the country hurting from Republican economic nonsense was practically forgotten after 8 years of Obama-Biden. Trump and his clowns reminded everyone what happens to our economy under Republican rule, but only after they got into power. The 2020 election was marked by five million people saying "oops, not this time!" all on the same day.

ecstatic

(35,075 posts)
3. What type of message would that group need to hear
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 03:50 PM
Sep 2023

that is not covered by the messages targeted to women and/or minorities?

And would the message that older white men need to hear offend or alienate the other members of the base?

ecstatic

(35,075 posts)
11. I'm not disagreeing just genuinely curious
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:18 PM
Sep 2023

Is it a specific topic that wasn't covered or was it more superficial, like a lack of older white men in her TV / online ads?

DontBelieveEastisEas

(1,211 posts)
15. I understood your post exactly as you describe
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:27 PM
Sep 2023

Please look at post 5 for a possible beginning of an answer.

By me response there, it would seem that perhaps an economic message was being missed.
Perhaps there could have been a "get rid of nuclear weapons" message, or perhaps that is only in my dreams.

Likely, a greater emphasis on economics.
But, like I say, I'm not reliving enough to want to try to say what the messaging should have been, beyond letting you know that the messaging failed in the way my OP is titled.

Thanks for your patience with me.

Elessar Zappa

(16,385 posts)
7. Oh, please.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:00 PM
Sep 2023

I’m a middle aged white man and Hillary spoke to me just fine. White men shouldn’t require coddling.

senseandsensibility

(24,974 posts)
8. I look at it this way
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:02 PM
Sep 2023

We may think that white males should be able to see that Dem policies are best for them. And some of them do get that message. The majority don't, for whatever reason. And they're a HUGE voting block. We don't live in an age of subtle nuance. We need to spell it out. And I don't want to offend anyone, but many white males practically need to be hit over the head with messages because the propaganda from the other side is so loud. So if we want their votes, we have to say things that seem very obvious to us. Democrats brought you the week-end, medicare, social security, etc. They honestly don't know that. It's frustrating, I agree, and they should know it. But we have to deal with reality here.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
9. I just checked Hillary's Vision for America list of goals she set for herself
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:09 PM
Sep 2023
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/

Not a single of these goals excluded middle aged white men. Nor did they exclude any minority. Nor did they single out any group.

Even items like "racial justice" include white middle aged men: it speaks of equal justice for all, including white middle aged men. All of them, without exception,are the concepts that would, and did, improve the life of middle age white men.

If course, certain middle age white men who are routinely affordeded certain privileges that come with their age, race and gender, might erroneously interpret equality as discrimination.

LeftInTX

(34,295 posts)
10. Her commercials were very female oriented
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:15 PM
Sep 2023

People often vote based on commercials.

It probably would have helped to have a few white middle aged men in her commercials.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
13. Without any research, I would venture a guess that the commercials of her male challengers were
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:22 PM
Sep 2023

even more male oriented. Didn't stop women from voting for them.

But I would like to see an example of what you are talking about. Anything you can cite?

Easterncedar

(6,267 posts)
14. Can we think about how we positively connect?
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:22 PM
Sep 2023

Of course folks said they felt left out. Some of these would seize any excuse not to vote for a woman/democrat, some were played by the right into manufactured outrage and alienation. And so on. But can’t we at least thoughtfully examine the campaigns to see if we might be able bring back some of the alienated?

mercuryblues

(16,413 posts)
18. I actually heard a relative say
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:34 PM
Sep 2023

They could never vote for Hillary/female president. They were afraid she would nuke another country when she was on her period,

I kid you not.

Mr.Bill

(24,906 posts)
22. And if you talk to these people,
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:57 PM
Sep 2023

or spend a little time on the websites they frequent, you would know that a fair percentage of them believe the Clintons have murdered hundreds of people. I mean they have lists of them. They really believe it, and no political commercial is going to change that.

And that's only one of the things that they believe, thanks to the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.

mercuryblues

(16,413 posts)
26. IKR
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:16 PM
Sep 2023

In order to do all the evil they are accused of, 1,000's of people would have to be involved. Someone would have told by now. They have investigated the Clinton's to no end. Hell' the even investigated Sock's the Cat. And their Christmas card list.

Nothing, nadda to indict them on.

DontBelieveEastisEas

(1,211 posts)
20. It was mentioned just for context, to set the mood and understanding.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:51 PM
Sep 2023

Take the boasting that I "warned" out of the equation.
That is not what is important here.

GoodRaisin

(10,922 posts)
85. Huh? That doesn't make any sense.
Tue Sep 5, 2023, 02:58 AM
Sep 2023

There was plenty in Hillary’s campaign messages that would have helped white guys. I don’t understand the “context” comment though.

mercuryblues

(16,413 posts)
17. Hillary didn't mention me by name, WAAaaaaahhhhhh!
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 04:31 PM
Sep 2023

I can't vote for her now.



JFC, Get over yourself.

mercuryblues

(16,413 posts)
27. LOL. Play the victim, when called out on your BS.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:19 PM
Sep 2023

So predictable of a white male whining that he didn't get special treatment. A woman didn't defer to his wants. Why he is Defamed! LOL.

DontBelieveEastisEas

(1,211 posts)
35. 1) law : to harm the reputation of by communicating false statements about
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:28 PM
Sep 2023

That is exactly as I meant it.

dpibel

(3,944 posts)
39. You best betake yourself to a lawyer
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:33 PM
Sep 2023

right away, then!

I'm pretty sure that you can find someone to take this case.

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
40. Which is kind of what you did to Hillary in your OP. Also, refighting a primary, & bashing a Dem.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:33 PM
Sep 2023

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
32. In some people's heads, she never goes away. Even in the grave, they will kick her.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:26 PM
Sep 2023

Personally, I say: God bless Hillary Clinton. She’s fought the good fight her whole life.

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
24. Hey man, it was a total deal-breaker for me that major Dem candidates never once, not once, ...
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:13 PM
Sep 2023

…dropped in to a diner and shook my actual hand in my personal home town in the most populous state in the nation. I mean Jesus Christ on a trailer hitch, how hard would it be for them to find me in a state of 40 million people? The sheer arrogance of those Democrats! How can I, the personally insulted and overlooked, even be asked to care about the rest of the country?



As someone else asked upthread: Just remind us — who were you at DU during Hillary Clinton’s campaign against Trump?


dpibel

(3,944 posts)
37. Did you know that 2016 was 7 years ago?
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:30 PM
Sep 2023

Is there a reason anyone should care very deeply about your vague recollections of the advertising strategies of a campaign that ended 7/10 of a decade ago?

Or is Hillary running again and I haven't heard about it?

dpibel

(3,944 posts)
43. I think there's another word for it...
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:36 PM
Sep 2023

but I just can't quite call it to mind.

Getting a fast moving thread this big isn't a job for amateurs, you know.

hlthe2b

(113,971 posts)
41. Generally relitigating the last election is frowned upon & you are going back to 2016--2 cycles ago
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:34 PM
Sep 2023

Why? Former SOS Clinton is running for nothing. Nor is she running/involved in Biden's reelection campaign. Nor is her strategy specifically adopted by Biden-Harris in 2024 any more than it was in 2020.

So, why the fixation on 2016 and HRC? And why do you seemingly have no concern for anyone BUT middle age white men? I care about everyone especially the working class and the poor--regardless of gender, gender identity, race, ethnicity, or any other immutable factor. Most Democrats DO likewise.

DontBelieveEastisEas

(1,211 posts)
47. At first I wanted to respond to your post, but then realized you are not focused
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:47 PM
Sep 2023

An article on CNN prompted me, it said, "The roster of swing states that both sides can genuinely hope to win may be as small next year as at any point in modern history"

What's past is prologue.
If you fail to learn from history, you are doomed to repeat it.

I joined this forum when Obama was running, because I thought an idea I had would help get him elected.
I figured the best way to possibly let my thoughts bubble up to those that actually process the ideas, would be to post to this forum.

There are lessons to be learned.

That is the why. It's no coincidence that I have posted this. lol

You said, "why do you seemingly have no concern for anyone BUT middle age....".
This is what let me see that you missed focus.
Reread the OP, and my others in this thread as well, and you will see that it never "seems" like I lack concern.

I want to help win the elections for us.

hlthe2b

(113,971 posts)
48. I note you are accusing DUers of "defaming" you upstream just because they disagree.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:52 PM
Sep 2023

That means it is YOU who is not serious about positive discussion of strategy for the next election. And, it has not gone unnoticed that you are focusing on HRC and not the last Presidential--2020 election. Peculiar since the candidate in 2020 and his strategy is the one you SHOULD be seeking to influence--given Joe Biden is the likely candidate for reelection in 2024.

This tells me and many others here one thing and that is that your intent is merely to complain and bemoan, deride, and diminish Hillary Clinton. My, how reminiscent this is of some other websites...

Response to hlthe2b (Reply #48)

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
66. If that was the OP responding to you...
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 07:21 PM
Sep 2023

…. it makes for his 3rd hide. Interesting.

hlthe2b

(113,971 posts)
69. Yes. It was.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 07:40 PM
Sep 2023

It was a generally polite response to me, however, but they may have said something about another DUer. I only glanced at it, having decided to leave the discussion.

blogslug

(39,167 posts)
44. Hillary Clinton is not running for president in 2024
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:39 PM
Sep 2023

An older white man named Joe Biden is.

I hope you will vote accordingly.

StevieM

(10,578 posts)
46. She absolutely did target all the midwestern battleground states.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:45 PM
Sep 2023

She had massive advertising campaigns and GOTV operations in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Larger than the ones Obama had in 2012.

The was one state, Wisconsin, where she did not schedule any rallies after the primaries. I doubt that even cost her Wisconsin, and it certainly did not cost her the election.

2016 was all about exactly what it appeared to be about--the fake email controversy. And James Comey dominated that race from start to finish.

W_HAMILTON

(10,333 posts)
54. Yep.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 06:21 PM
Sep 2023

The only people that still have Hillary fried into their brains at this point are rightwingers and Horseshoe leftwingers. Given the stale talking point about how she didn't campaign enough in Midwestern states -- I mean, the fucking convention was in one of those states, her last campaign rally before the election was in one of those states, etc. -- is often brought up by Jill Stein voters looking to blame someone else for their dumb fucking decision not to vote for the candidate running on "the most progressive platform" in Democratic history (Bernie Sanders's words), I can guess which one applies here.

DontBelieveEastisEas

(1,211 posts)
56. edited OP
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 06:44 PM
Sep 2023

I edited out any mention of Midwestern states

I only mentioned that because I felt I needed to humble my pronouncement of a "big mistake"
I was trying to minimize what I was pointing out.

BTW, someone mentions that there are talking points by some about this issue to spread a false impression, so it is no wonder that I had "heard" it. And I did say, "if so".

Where the campaign focused is not the issue I want to make anyway, so I edited that part out of the OP.

Thanks for the knowledge.

Mossfern

(4,716 posts)
50. I'm wondering why I sense so much hostility in this thread
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 05:58 PM
Sep 2023

considering that we're all on the same "team."

I honestly thought that this forum was a civil one.

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
55. A lot of us are wondering why the OP wrote something so hostile to Hillary Clinton, by name,...
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 06:42 PM
Sep 2023
Hillary last ran 7 years ago, and won the popular vote by 3 million votes. A majority of American voters agreed with her and what she stood for and how she said it. A majority of American voters did not want Trump to win, and said so at the ballot box.

Perhaps the question should be: how can we attract and keep the following fringe far-lefties in our camp? The ones who’ve been amazingly clever at working the margins of the Electoral College…

* Bernie “Dolores Huerta should just stfu” Bros (not the Senator, just the residual Bros)
* Jill “Putin’s dinner” Stein voters
* Susan “Trump’s election will bring on the glorious revolution” Sarandon voters
* Cornell “tear the Democratic Party down because I never got my due from the first Black president” West voters

Or maybe the question should be, how can we work around these useless fringe people and neuter their influence.

Mossfern

(4,716 posts)
82. It was a criticism of her campaign tactics, or to be more precise; her advisors
Tue Sep 5, 2023, 02:38 AM
Sep 2023

It was not an attack on Hillary herself.
Constructive criticism is not an attack.
Heckate, your perception what needed/ still needs to be done stands absolutely true.

I do think that there's a great amount of miscommunication here and hostility will not bring us very close together - even weaken us if we don't have clear communication.

The Democratic needs to court as many people as possible - any hostility among weakens us.
Pardon me if I sound a bit incomprehensible myself - it's 2:30 in the morning and was awakened by pain.

think that Hillary herself would not have found his post offensive.

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
87. We'll talk more later
Tue Sep 5, 2023, 03:54 AM
Sep 2023

There’s nothing like insomnia caused by pain. Take care of yourself & rest

ismnotwasm

(42,674 posts)
53. So. How would you go about acknowledging middle-aged White males in a political ad?
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 06:15 PM
Sep 2023

What would have made that demographic feel valued enough?

ismnotwasm

(42,674 posts)
70. I recall this being done.
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 07:54 PM
Sep 2023

Being pro-union is a Democratic stronghold. It was and is definitely highlighted in the platform

tavernier

(14,443 posts)
57. Dear Rip Van Winkle
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 06:45 PM
Sep 2023

Good morning. Hillary is not running in this election. Russia saw to her loss in her last election. We have discovered much and worked out some of those kinks, not all. But the Republican Party is in a shambles so we have hope that many are coming to their senses. Oh and by the way, there is a group out there called the Proud Boys. They are basically white males who fear that their girlfriends will prefer to date people of color, or Jews, or anyone smarter or more attractive. So they tried to bully the country to elect a president who would be simpatico to their desires. Most of them are in jail now, and the rest are on their way. So much for white males who were overlooked or misunderstood.

And now you are caught up.

Pathwalker

(6,603 posts)
58. Wait a minute - you, a white man, are complaining that not enough
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 06:55 PM
Sep 2023

attention was personally paid to you SEVEN years ago by a woman. Do I have this right?

betsuni

(29,078 posts)
71. Old attack resurrected: Democrats Have No Economic Message, Ignore White Working/Middle Class
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 08:12 PM
Sep 2023

Because of Identity Politics.

The Dangerous Myth That Hillary Clinton Ignored the Working Class:

"Hillary Clinton talked about the working class, middle-class jobs, and the dignity of work constantly. And she still lost. She detailed plans to help coal miners and steel workers. She had decades of ideas to help parents, especially working moms, and their children. She had plans to help young men who were getting out of prison and for old men who were getting into new careers. She talked about the dignity of manufacturing jobs ... . ... She offered the most comprehensively progressive economic platform of any presidential candidate in history ... ." The word "jobs" was the most frequent word in her speeches.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/12/hillary-clinton-working-class/509477/

Hillary forgot my demographic --

Oopsie Daisy

(6,670 posts)
73. I know. Crazy, right?
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 08:42 PM
Sep 2023

>> Hillary forgot my demographic --
I know. Crazy, right? Now, obviously I can't speak to this poster's motivation or reasons, but I can tell you that I've heard similar admonishments (attacks) against Hillary from others on the Internet, and each time it was being offered-up as someone's excuse, or justification, for being like Sarandon or Turner and voting for Stein instead of Hillary.

betsuni

(29,078 posts)
75. Someone says, "I come from the white working class and I am deeply humiliated that the
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 09:03 PM
Sep 2023

Democratic Party cannot talk to where I come from" ... what? What fictional Democratic Party is that?

jcgoldie

(12,046 posts)
79. 2016 called
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 10:02 PM
Sep 2023

They want their slighted white guy beef back. For fuck's sake. Find something else to blame Hillary Clinton for its motherfucking 2023!

betsuni

(29,078 posts)
89. Hillary Forgot. A poem.
Tue Sep 5, 2023, 05:06 AM
Sep 2023

I and one other person warned about this
We were saturated
In her Advertising
Hillary Ads
Tinges of fairness for minorities and women
Saturated, that messages
But there was never a message that left her other message 2 out of it
That spoke to concepts
The life of a middle aged white man
Hillary forgot my demographic
A big mistake
Saturated
Hillary forgot
The life of a middle aged white man

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary forgot to acknowl...