General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA WaPo Poll Found That Significant Majorities Support Pro-Trans Policies, But Reported The Opposite
https://www.readtpa.com/p/a-wapo-poll-found-that-significant*snip*
Most in U.S. back GOPs anti-trans policies, reads the headline of a piece by the Posts Laura Meckler and Scott Clement. Poll bolsters those seeking restrictions in schools, sports and health care, continues the subheadline.
Yep. The front page. I was shocked to see this, as there hasnt been a single poll Ive seen that shows that clear majorities of Americans support restrictions on trans peoples lives. Heres how it begins:
Clear majorities of Americans support restrictions affecting transgender children, a Washington Post-KFF poll finds, offering political jet fuel for Republicans in state legislatures and Congress who are pushing measures restricting curriculum, sports participation and medical care.
This frames the GOPs anti-trans policies as being about children, but thats just not the reality of whats happening, and its worth being very clear about this: the GOPs anti-trans policies are not just about trans minors. Many are, and theyre horrible policies, but that is by no means an accurate description of what the GOP is trying to do. Just look at Florida, which just last week passed a bill that effectively banned trans people from using public restrooms that match their gender identity at any building owned/leased/funded by the state government. Stadiums, airports, hospitals, schools, etc.
Thats not about children. Its a ban on trans people of all ages. See also: Kansas and Arkansas, which passed their own version of this policy. And then theres the matter of Missouris attorney general unilaterally imposing a policy that would force trans adults off hormone therapy and make transition-related health care near impossible to get. Oh, and dont forget Montana, which just made it impossible for trans people to update their identifying documents at all.
*snip*
reymega life
(675 posts)barbaraann
(9,289 posts)First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak outbecause I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak outbecause I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak outbecause I was not a Jew.
Then they came for meand there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niemöller
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,955 posts)Phoenix61
(18,828 posts)Im sure there are lots of people who oppose abortion or guns etc but arent for laws that make them illegal.
intheflow
(30,179 posts)Before the explosion of anti-trans legislation. Why did it take them four months to publishing this? I'd like to see the same poll taken now. I'd bet the numbers would be too overwhelming in favor of trans rights for them to fudge the headline.
Sympthsical
(10,969 posts)When I saw them, it was like, "Quite a bit has happened since then."
With increased attention and consciousness brought to trans issues, it feels like any poll should be a hell of a lot more recent than six months ago. Especially if you're going to slap results on the front page as being salient to the national conversation.
The author of that article isn't really arguing the results. Just the framing. I.e. does opposition to something equate to supporting policy banning it? That's pretty much the entire thing.
But there is a fair consistency in things over the past few years. People generally don't like discrimination. If you ask if someone should be fired or lose their housing, most people will say no. Americans have gotten a lot better at a sense of fairness in these things over time. However, when you ask questions about medicalization of minors and sports, opposition is significantly higher (2/3 against participation in sports, 2/3 against puberty blockers, 58/42 against hormones for older teenagers 15-18).
So that's where Republicans are taking aim. They use those two things to advertise their policies, because they know most people don't like those things. However, what they advertise less is sneaking in discrimination and stripping of protections for trans people in other areas that do not have to do with those two issues.
I'd be much more interested in seeing if and how numbers have shifted in the past six months as these issues have increasingly been in the media spotlight.