General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHappy Confederate surrender day to all those who celebrate the defeat of treason. #Appomattox
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
republianmushroom
(22,325 posts)thank you
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)Considering what happened back then maybe they should have only allowed one Senator for each of those states.
ThoughtCriminal
(14,721 posts)Duppers
(28,469 posts)jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)after 158 years of whitening washes.
TNNurse
(7,541 posts)and descendant of a Confederate soldier certainly celebrates.
ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)But I'm not a lifelong southerner.
A southerner in the family once asked me what I thought about Gone with the Wind.
Book or movie, since I was familiar with both?
After that surprise wore off, it was, so what did you think? From the big s**t-eating grin, I knew the fool expected gushing praise.
My answer: "If it weren't for the twisted love story of Rhett and Scarlett, you could have ended the book and the movie right after Rhett says that the south would only bring cotton slaves and arrogance to a war--which wouldn't be enough to win it. Everything after that, all ten gazillion pages or hours of it, is simply about proving him right. What a bore."
TNNurse
(7,541 posts)I am not ashamed of that heritage. He may have needed food and clothes and this was a way...for awhile.
My Mother's brother on the other hand, searched for someone who did not buy their way out of fighting for the Confederacy. He never found one, much to the delight of my generation. Pretty sure there were landowners (known as slave owners) in that group.
Aristus
(72,187 posts)All of my ancestors who fought in the Civil War fought for the Confederacy. Doesnt mean I have to follow their lead; they were traitors, pure and simple.
Shoot, Im only two generations removed from the Klan. But their ghosts can all go fuck themselves forever for being horrible human beings.
Warm Spring mornings, the smell of honeysuckle, biscuits and gravy for breakfast, and paralyzingly good barbecue for dinner. Thats the extent of my nostalgia for the South.
Wounded Bear
(64,324 posts)The Jungle 1
(4,552 posts)ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)That they weren't all executed for treason.
That's what tended to happen to traitors like them after other insurrections.
ITAL
(1,323 posts)If they had thought they'd be immediately executed. It would have been a guerrilla war for the next 50 years.
erronis
(23,875 posts)by a real historian.
https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/april-8-2023
orthoclad
(4,728 posts)"As soon as the papers were signed, Lee told Grant his men were starving and asked if the Union general could provide the Confederates with rations. Grant didn't hesitate. "Certainly," he responded, before asking how many men needed food. He took Lee's answer"about twenty-five thousand"in stride, telling the general that "he could have...all the provisions wanted.""
So the plantation cavaliers led their people into death and misery, and the Union bailed them out.
"...the Confederates who had ridden off to war four years before boasting that their wealthy aristocrats would beat the North's moneygrubbing shopkeepers in a single battle were broken and starving, while, backed by a booming industrial economy, the Union army could provide rations for twenty-five thousand men on a moment's notice."
Now the oligarchs give their people dashing heroes (at least in their imagination), and the working class bails them out.
edit: from the link above.
Boomerproud
(9,292 posts)Indiana calvary. I would love to know what the motivation was to enlist. He was a day laborer in the 1860 census as a 18 yr old so the 25.00 bounty might have been tempting.
ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)Those traitors deserved far worse than what they got in the aftermath. If I'd had a say, the entire south would have been pathetically grateful to become states again after, oh, 75 years of being territories.
And that was only for starters!
WarGamer
(18,613 posts)Instead of pumping your fist like at an Alabama v Auburn game.
That's approx 2% of the US population being KIA in the war...
Or in 2023 terms, 7 million KIA.
edhopper
(37,370 posts)i did not know that Appomattox Court House was the name of the town. I always thought it was the Court House in the town of Appomattox.
Aristus
(72,187 posts)Instead of having a town as the county seat out in sparsely populated areas, there was often just a cluster of houses around the county courthouse.
thucythucy
(9,103 posts)Rhiannon12866
(255,525 posts)BTW, Grant's Cottage - where General Grant convalesced and died - is just down the road from here. My grandmother, who was big on history and knew the caretaker, often brought us there as kids. And now they have frequent historical presentations during the summer season.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)
Rhiannon12866
(255,525 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)Twitter always adds something like "format=jpg" and "small".
Rhiannon12866
(255,525 posts)usonian
(25,315 posts)electric_blue68
(26,856 posts)ITAL
(1,323 posts)It is June 19th, 1865. So, roughly 2.5 months later.
Of course, slavery continued in Kentucky and Delaware up until the 13th Amendment was ratified in December of 1865. Since they were loyal to the Union their slaves were not freed by the Emancipation Proclamation (neither were Missouri's or Maryland's, but those two states freed their slaves before the end of the war) and both kept the institution till the end.
electric_blue68
(26,856 posts)Oh, boy,further complications there Kentucky & Delaware. At least Missouri, and Maryland did better.
Bad enough my city NYC, didn't end slavery till July 4, 1827, and racism kept on going.
ITAL
(1,323 posts)But yeah, four slave holding states did stay loyal to the Union, and thus were not affected by the Emancipation Proclamation. Missouri freed theirs January 11th, 1865. Maryland did so a couple of months earlier (November 1st, 1864).
Kentucky and Delaware were the last slave holding states and neither was particularly happy giving up slavery considering they'd stayed loyal throughout the war.
It's one of the reasons when people say the war wasn't fought over slavery while I don't agree, but I also don't think it entirely was either. For the South, yes it was mostly about slavery. For the North, that is not really true at all. The North mostly fought for Union, with abolition being important, but secondary (and for many it was important more as a military measure to cut the guts out of the southern war effort than as a true humanitarian thing). And that's especially true with for the four border states who stayed true to Union. And likely, if they'd left, the South would have had a much greater chance of winning (at the very least Washington DC would have been abandoned as the nation's capital city).
The Civil War is pretty complicated.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)and resisted his comrades who wanted him to disperse what was left of his army into the mountains, to fight a guerrilla war which might have lasted for decades further. Instead, he made the right decision... and afterwards supported the re-unification of our country.
Lee was never a "pro-slavery fire-eater"-- indeed, he freed a number of the slaves, which he had inherited, before it was legally mandated... the war freed the rest. Those that he did free, he was concerned that they would have the means to live independently, before he released them ...
Yes, he fought for the wrong side, but I do not personally believe that the issue of slavery made any difference in his decision one way or the other... He mostly fought to protect his own homeland, "Virginia", from 'invasion'... and to protect his family from the same.
YES, he made the wrong decision--- but he was never any "Nathan Bedford Forrest"...
mostly, he was just a life-long soldier who chose to fight for his home,
which happened to be the ABSOLUTELY WRONG SIDE...
NO, I don't think any statues should be maintained to him anywhere,
but I think that any big hatreds against the southern confederacy
would be more appropriately directed elsewhere---
such as against the previously mentioned Nathan Bedford Forrest,
who was a slave-trader before the war,
and founded the KKK afterwards....
Regardless, Lee should not be regarded as any kind of 'hero' ANYWHERE in the United States--
he gave up that chance when he refused Lincoln's offer to command the army of the union.
He was only a great soldier, who chose to fight for the wrong side.
electric_blue68
(26,856 posts)who Grant, Sherman, and Lee were.
The name Appomattox did sound familiar, but not why.
