General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMissouri republicans first amendment to house rules is to make stricter rules on what women can wear
https://www.riverfronttimes.com/news/missouri-republicans-have-found-their-post-roe-enemy-cardigans-39259210Missouri Republicans Have Found Their Post-Roe Enemy: Cardigans
Missouri Republicans aren't done telling women what to do with their bodies
Peter Merideth (D-St. Louis) shared the news on Twitter, "Debating the house rules on the floor today, and the first amendment offered by a Republican is about making stricter the rules of what women have to wear in here."
--------
Lawmakers can change the House dress code every two years. Previously, the dress code stated that women could wear "dresses or skirts or slacks worn with a blazer or sweater and appropriate dress shoes or boots." The rules require women to wear a second layer over a dress or top, and some lawmakers preferred to wear shawls or other items that weren't jackets. The madness had to be stopped.
The proposed dress code says "proper attire for women shall be business attire, including jackets worn with dresses, skirts, or slacks and dress shoes or boots." But Representative Brenda Shields (R-St. Joseph) suggested they amend the dress code to allow cardigans to count as jackets, which led to a seemingly ludicrous debate, Representative Jamie Johnson (D-Kansas City) detailed on Twitter.
Lovie777
(22,973 posts)raising2moredems
(752 posts)Because they are horribly insecure and really have no self-esteem. Face it, more puke "males" are toads that only have a spouse because their interbreeding circle is from a so-called religion.
lark
(26,081 posts)They hate us because we won't always "fluff'" on command, they fear us taking control of our bodies because they want us to be nothing more than baby machines, producing poor children, with no education or health care, who will work for pennies. Birth control and abortion threaten their desired plentiful supply of ultra cheap labor.
cbabe
(6,647 posts)intheflow
(30,179 posts)I'd like to see the whole dress code. If the men are required to wear suit jackets, then I can see how that could be viewed as a form of inequity. But that would just be the excuse for the real reason for the change: for men to control women's bodies.
KentuckyWoman
(7,401 posts)The women can... why can't the men?
Bayard
(29,683 posts)Maybe they should just go to uniforms for all.
AllaN01Bear
(29,488 posts)nascar like jumpsuts with patches denoting their donors .
Bayard
(29,683 posts)Someone would advise Kyrsten Sinema on dressing professionally. Jumpsuits would solve that too!
area51
(12,691 posts)that are more pressing issues than this.
jmowreader
(53,194 posts)Isn't a business dress proper business attire without a jacket over it?
If they're going to do BS like this, why don't they just state that everyone in the body is required to wear a suit with pants that cover your entire leg?
Skittles
(171,709 posts)you don't see guys doing that
but that might be just me....
ProfessorGAC
(76,702 posts)So, it isn't just you.
And, I wasn't a clothing conformist. I was the guy that wore gray on gray or olive double breastfed suits with a yellow shirt when everyone was wearing blue pinstripe 3 button. I wore Brutini slip-ons when others wore Florsheim wingtips.
But, I agree on sleeveless for business dress.
Skittles
(171,709 posts)I'm not interested in fashion at all but I would never have gone sleeveless at work and I cringe when I see women doing it, always looks like they should be in a cocktail lounge.
ProfessorGAC
(76,702 posts)I was testifying as an expert witness in a $90 million intellectual property lawsuit. (Our company was not involved. I was "on loan" to a big customer. )
Their chief counsel really liked me, but their CMO not so much.
They changed the witness order suddenly and the lead litigator said to get ready for the stand.
I came down in a dark gray suit with fine burgundy threading, a white shirt & striped tir.
CMO says, "I was worried you'd come down wearing Italian shoes or something." I Saud "These are Italian shoes. So is the suit."
I crushed my testimony and their side won, so there was never another snide word.
Skittles
(171,709 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(22,957 posts)spooky3
(38,632 posts)madinmaryland
(65,729 posts)Anyone what to wear.
Rebl2
(17,740 posts)MO state house are idiots.
xmas74
(30,058 posts)Because a state rep repeatedly spit his chew on the antique hardwood floors.
DET
(2,499 posts)This reminds me of high school back in the dark ages when girls were required to wear modest dresses or skirts - no pants allowed. And that was public school. So ridiculous.
Ford_Prefect
(8,610 posts)lindysalsagal
(22,911 posts)Insanity
moondust
(21,286 posts)czarjak
(13,639 posts)onenote
(46,142 posts)brainwashed.
Mopar151
(10,348 posts)Setting, and enforcing "social norms" is what bullies do! "Odd Girl Out" has the blueprints.
Warpy
(114,615 posts)and trying yo control women they don't even know is obviously their chief priority now and forever.
Why can't people see these two bit tyrants for what they are?
onenote
(46,142 posts)Amusing story of the punishment meted out to a member of the state senate who wore bib overalls to work.
https://missouriindependent.com/2022/02/16/after-wearing-overalls-in-the-missouri-senate-gop-lawmaker-loses-committee-spots/
xmas74
(30,058 posts)He knew that it would drum up publicity.
He's a huge MAGA lover.
keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)kimbutgar
(27,248 posts)A pantsuit. In the 1980s I worked for an investment banking firm and you couldnt wear pants. Now these repukes want to make a dress code for women 40+ years later. The repukes really want to put women back in the home cooking dinner and only raising children.
That genie in the bottle is not going to go back in repukes!
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(14,238 posts)red slacks with a nice 1980s blouse. She was called into the bosses office and reprimanded. women gathered in hallways to discuss the woman in red pants.
it was such a big deal.
She waited a few weeks and wore them again.
kimbutgar
(27,248 posts)Could Pants for the cold spell. The room got silent and he finally said we could wear pants the next day 3/4 of the women in the firm wore pants. I left that firm and went to another firm who was ok with pants. The funny thing is women started pushing back at the old firm and started wearing pants. I knew I was leaving that old firm so I didnt care what the manager thought or repercussions!
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(14,238 posts)helped them to shed the suits and ties.
kimbutgar
(27,248 posts)Nor anyone wearing a tie and no women in dresses!
We women lead the dress down of business In America!
Martin68
(27,749 posts)WestMichRad
(3,254 posts)
and requiring that women wear granny panties, because the thought that they might have on sexy panties is distracting them.
(Do I need a sarcasm tag?)
maxsolomon
(38,720 posts)"Don't dress like Kirsten Sinema'" That'd be my only rule.
Mysterian
(6,482 posts)How very sad.
louis-t
(24,618 posts)Timeflyer
(3,756 posts)Initech
(108,782 posts)cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)Becasue if I recall from another article I read about this the dress code for the men does not allowed to wear just a dress shirt for example and they must wear a shirt with a jacket and tie.