Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsReagan embraced gun control in response to political extremism. This Supreme Court didn't.
Link to tweet
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2022-07-03/commentary-ronald-reagan-gun-control-political-extremism-supreme-court
No paywall
https://archive.ph/NnFKZ
Fifty-five years before the Supreme Courts conservative majority made it easier for people to carry guns in public, a Republican governor in California signed a law making it harder to do exactly that.
Theres no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons, then-Gov. Ronald Reagan said in 1967.
It was a sunny day in May when he made that comment on the steps of the state Capitol, just hours after an extraordinary political demonstration rocked Sacramento.
More than two dozen members of the Black Panther Party a radical Black Power group that patrolled Bay Area streets in armed self-defense against police had marched into the Capitol carrying loaded rifles, pistols and shotguns. Several barged into the Assembly chamber to protest a bill prohibiting people from carrying loaded weapons in California cities.
We have a constitutional right to bear arms, the protesters shouted as they were carted off by police.
Reagan soon signed the bill into law, setting California on the path to having the nations strictest gun controls. That law became the cornerstone of Californias approach to restricting who can get a permit to carry a concealed weapon the very system the Supreme Court torpedoed with its June 23 ruling striking down a similar law in New York.
*snip*
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reagan embraced gun control in response to political extremism. This Supreme Court didn't. (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Jul 2022
OP
Yes it was because the were Black. Had they been white I doubt RR would have gone so libby
JanMichael
Jul 2022
#3
Ocelot II
(130,532 posts)1. Yes, but could it be that this sudden desire for gun control
was because the radicals with the guns were Black? White radicals with guns don't seem to inspire such intense passion for gun control...
Nevilledog
(55,079 posts)2. Absolutely
JanMichael
(25,725 posts)3. Yes it was because the were Black. Had they been white I doubt RR would have gone so libby
dweller
(28,409 posts)4. Well, at least not yet

✌🏻
Ocelot II
(130,532 posts)5. So I wonder what might happen if thousands of women showed up
at pro-choice rallies packing heat - legally, of course, like this woman. A lot of heads might explode.
dweller
(28,409 posts)6. What if a million
showed up at gun shops buying, and expressing it was for their self defense after RvW decision
🤔
✌🏻