Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(55,079 posts)
Sun Jul 3, 2022, 06:56 PM Jul 2022

Reagan embraced gun control in response to political extremism. This Supreme Court didn't.





https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2022-07-03/commentary-ronald-reagan-gun-control-political-extremism-supreme-court

No paywall
https://archive.ph/NnFKZ

Fifty-five years before the Supreme Court’s conservative majority made it easier for people to carry guns in public, a Republican governor in California signed a law making it harder to do exactly that.

“There’s no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons,” then-Gov. Ronald Reagan said in 1967.

It was a sunny day in May when he made that comment on the steps of the state Capitol, just hours after an extraordinary political demonstration rocked Sacramento.

More than two dozen members of the Black Panther Party — a radical Black Power group that patrolled Bay Area streets in armed self-defense against police — had marched into the Capitol carrying loaded rifles, pistols and shotguns. Several barged into the Assembly chamber to protest a bill prohibiting people from carrying loaded weapons in California cities.

“We have a constitutional right to bear arms,” the protesters shouted as they were carted off by police.

Reagan soon signed the bill into law, setting California on the path to having the nation’s strictest gun controls. That law became the cornerstone of California’s approach to restricting who can get a permit to carry a concealed weapon — the very system the Supreme Court torpedoed with its June 23 ruling striking down a similar law in New York.

*snip*




6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reagan embraced gun control in response to political extremism. This Supreme Court didn't. (Original Post) Nevilledog Jul 2022 OP
Yes, but could it be that this sudden desire for gun control Ocelot II Jul 2022 #1
Absolutely Nevilledog Jul 2022 #2
Yes it was because the were Black. Had they been white I doubt RR would have gone so libby JanMichael Jul 2022 #3
Well, at least not yet dweller Jul 2022 #4
So I wonder what might happen if thousands of women showed up Ocelot II Jul 2022 #5
What if a million dweller Jul 2022 #6

Ocelot II

(130,532 posts)
1. Yes, but could it be that this sudden desire for gun control
Sun Jul 3, 2022, 07:01 PM
Jul 2022

was because the radicals with the guns were Black? White radicals with guns don't seem to inspire such intense passion for gun control...

JanMichael

(25,725 posts)
3. Yes it was because the were Black. Had they been white I doubt RR would have gone so libby
Sun Jul 3, 2022, 07:04 PM
Jul 2022

Ocelot II

(130,532 posts)
5. So I wonder what might happen if thousands of women showed up
Sun Jul 3, 2022, 07:09 PM
Jul 2022

at pro-choice rallies packing heat - legally, of course, like this woman. A lot of heads might explode.

dweller

(28,409 posts)
6. What if a million
Sun Jul 3, 2022, 07:28 PM
Jul 2022

showed up at gun shops buying, and expressing it was for their self defense after RvW decision

🤔


✌🏻

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reagan embraced gun contr...