Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm old enough to remember when conservatives were OUTRAGED about "foreign law" being used
All the way back from 2004...
*Cue wavy flashback effect. Diddly doo, diddly doo, diddly doo...*
Stepping into a battle between the liberal and conservative justices on the U.S. Supreme Court, Republican House members are protesting the courts increasing use of foreign legal precedents in interpreting the Constitution.
Republican House members Tom Feeney of Florida and Bob Goodlatte of Virginia, joined by more than 50 co-sponsors, will propose a non-binding resolution next week that would express the sense of Congress that judicial decisions should not be based on foreign laws or court decisions.
While Feeney and Goodlatte, who are members of the House Judiciary Committee, cant summon the justices before them to defend their use of foreign precedents, they hope to fire a rhetorical shot across the bow of jurists who increasingly look to foreign legal trends, especially in death penalty and gay rights cases.
Feeney even used the I word, impeachment, in an interview with MSNBC.com in his House office Wednesday.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna4506232
Republican House members Tom Feeney of Florida and Bob Goodlatte of Virginia, joined by more than 50 co-sponsors, will propose a non-binding resolution next week that would express the sense of Congress that judicial decisions should not be based on foreign laws or court decisions.
While Feeney and Goodlatte, who are members of the House Judiciary Committee, cant summon the justices before them to defend their use of foreign precedents, they hope to fire a rhetorical shot across the bow of jurists who increasingly look to foreign legal trends, especially in death penalty and gay rights cases.
Feeney even used the I word, impeachment, in an interview with MSNBC.com in his House office Wednesday.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna4506232
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm old enough to remember when conservatives were OUTRAGED about "foreign law" being used (Original Post)
ck4829
May 2022
OP
Yeah! I for one say fuck Habeas corpus, the Magna Carta and enverything that descended from it. 🤡
TheBlackAdder
May 2022
#2
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)1. Beth VanDyn from Irving, Tx.
The "Sharia Law" queen! Watch out for her.
She is way more dangerous than MTG.
Personal experience.
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)2. Yeah! I for one say fuck Habeas corpus, the Magna Carta and enverything that descended from it. 🤡
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,898 posts)3. I remember that also
This is a crappy opinion and Alito has to rely on crappy sources to support his extreme views