SCOTUS officially denies TFG's Call for review of 6/1 committee's bid for his WH records
BREAKING: SCOTUS has officially denied Donald Trump's call for Supreme Court review of the Jan. 6 select committee's bid for his White House records.
"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday brought a formal end to former President Donald Trump's request to block the release of White House records sought by the Democratic-led congressional panel investigating last year's deadly attack on the Capitol by a mob of his supporters.
The court's decision to formally reject Trump's appeal follows its Jan. 19 order that led to the documents being handed over to the House of Representatives investigative committee by the federal agency that stores government and historical records."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-supreme-court-formally-ends-145516807.html
Link to tweet
?s=20&t=BXyFNjaHwn9r5nA4ppzKJg
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022222zor_bq7d.pdf
The court’s move, which came in a brief unsigned order issued without comment, comes after the justices denied Trump’s emergency request to block the transfer of his White House records from the National Archives to the House select committee, a process that began last month.
Tuesday’s development formally ends Trump’s legal effort to stymie lawmakers’ efforts to obtain a batch of schedules, call logs, emails and other requested documents that the committee says could illuminate key circumstances surrounding the deadly Capitol riot.
The order leaves intact a lower federal appeals court ruling that found Trump’s assertion of executive privilege and other legal theories unpersuasive in light of President Biden’s refusal to invoke privilege, as well as the House panel’s pressing task.
Since the Supreme Court has disallowed Trump's use of Executive Privilege to stymie the work of the January 6 committee, where does this leave AG Garland's decision not to indict Mark Meadows who is refusing to cooperate with the committee on Executive Privilege grounds? If the court won't allow Trump to make the claim, then certainly Mark Meadows cannot make the claim.
https://www.wkrg.com/news/politics/supreme-court-turns-away-trumps-appeal-in-dispute-with-house-jan-6-panel/
= new reply since forum marked as read
They want him to FALL just as much as the rest of us - but for different reasons.
He is the common link to their illegitimate appointments to The Court. He was paid the political (and perhaps literal) blood money.
The quicker he is in jail and out of the public limelight the more secure their judas appointments become. The public quickly forgets unless or until the M$M starts a drumbeat.
Thos 3 Incompetent Quacks along with their ringleader Thomas will still pursue the most Conservative of Social Agendas.
But they are throwing TFG under the bus with smiles on their faces and malice in their black hearts. Have no doubt.
How apropos.
Even with his 3 picks went against him for the 2nd time in a matter of weeks.
I wonder how he will react. Not well I am to presume. 
those weren't Trump's picks for the SCOTUS, they were the Federalist Society's picks, and Trump just passed on their names to the Senate.
If it were up to Trump, Ivanka, Don Jr. and Eric would all have lifetime posts on the SCOTUS. Or maybe some of his porn actress friends. 
they want to protect the Constitution and the founding fathers' vision for this country.
Bullshit. Many things have changed in the almost 250 years since this country's inception, and the founding fathers knew this would happen. The Constitution was not a document carved in stone. It provided for ways to update and modernize the content of the Constitution, to stay current with society's norms.
What they didn't provide for was having the will of relatively few people completely negate the will of the people for whom they built this country. They did not provide for fascist takeovers.
That's my take on the FS anyway. They want to condense the power of many into the power of a few, diametrically opposed to the thoughts of our founding fathers (and it pains me to keep using that term, but that's just one of the many changes that have occured in almost 250 years). 
