So there ya have it. So what did you think? (Assuming you listed to Garland speak.)

[Stinky The Clown]

[uponit7771]

1. Good for him, this speech mostly is for those looking down like FAUX News viewers

[MineralMan]

4. I think it was excellent.

Despite not going straight for the throat regarding Trump and high level targets, he was solid in his assurances that they're on this, and on it hard.

I am encouraged.

[uponit7771]

7. +1, FAUX News has a 60 second response that focus's on titles and jots ... oh wait, they don't like

... MG pivoting to VR as an extension to j6 ... very interesting.

I think dems should push that more seeing FNs initial response to that point

[SallyHemmings]

8. I'm encouraged too

[chowder66]

12. What do you mean "... for those looking down"? Biden?

[uponit7771]

16. No, FAUX News viewers .. I'll change that post

[chowder66]

18. Oh wow. I was waaaaay off. : )

[Vinca]

2. It was a good speech. Short on any specifics of what's to come, but I feel a little better

knowing they'll keep after it as long as it takes. I'm also happy he mentioned voting.

[Beachnutt]

3. The green bay sweep is about to

get swept into the trash

[LiberalFighter]

10. Sacked? Loss of down?

[Beachnutt]

19. Arrested hopefully

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/jan6-peter-navarro-ted-cruz-green-bay-sweep-1276742/

[IrishAfricanAmerican]

21. 15 yards for "givin' him da business"

[Bev54]

5. I am relieved that he has confirmed they are looking at everyone

no matter who and that between those at the bottom to those at the top. I do believe he is investigating bottom up.

[LiberalFighter]

15. That is usually the best approach.

Those at the bottom are more scared and looking for a way out. And that way out involves implicating those above them.

[Emile]

6. Both sides. . .

It sucked!

[uponit7771]

13. This speech mostly is for those looking down so it's not aimed at the informed

[DURHAM D]

9. What does Claire McCaskill think?

That is who I want to hear from.

[sarcasmo]

14. Claire McCaskill will have choice words tonight.

[leftstreet]

11. I don't get this statement:

"The time to address threats is when they are made, not after the tragedy has struck."

[Bev54]

23. It means find and indict those making the threats before they carry them out for real.

[dajoki]

17. I think he did a great job...

in a few areas in particular. He seemed to make clear that they would go after everyone who was involved in the coup attempt no matter how high up they were. There was one segment where he appeared to speak directly to Manchin and Sinema about Congress ensuring everyone can vote and that vote must count.

[Deminpenn]

20. For a talk to a civics class, it was good

For a speech from the Atty General of the US, it was bad. Admittedly, only heard the end of it, but it was cringe-worthy, especially the bothsiderism.

I thought it showed Garland does not have a realistic view of the current world he is in. It cemented my belief that Biden should never have handed over DoJ to Garland as a consolation prize for being denied a seat on SCOTUS due to McConnell's obstructionism. DoJ needs a strong leader, not a former federal judge who seems to be running DoJ as if he were still on the bench enforcing rules that make things fair to both sides.

If I were Biden, I'd be appalled and being asking for Garland's resignation by the end of the day.

[Mr.Bill]

22. I'm glad I recorded it.

I will save it and use it as a sleep aid.

[budkin]

24. The voter suppression connection was the best part

So glad he brought it up

[secondwind]

25. I think the tone was JUST RIGHT. Garland laid it out, he said he will not let this go unpunished,

and that he is very much on the job of getting to the bottom of this..I REALLY liked his speech a lot.

No fancy stuff, just straight, honest and forthright.. I give him an A-plus

[demigoddess]

26. did he say it was an attempt at a coup d'etat? Because that is what it was.

anything less is denial, if you ask me.