Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
James Crumbley Mug Shot (Original Post) RandySF Dec 2021 OP
Father of the Year! winstars Dec 2021 #1
Soon to be declared some kind of "victim of tyranny" by the RWNJs. nt Progressive Jones Dec 2021 #2
The jury will hear all about his futigive attempt to escape... joshcryer Dec 2021 #3
I'vr been thinking about that, too. wnylib Dec 2021 #5
Don't get me wrong, the kid is going down. joshcryer Dec 2021 #6
Unlikely Effete Snob Dec 2021 #16
I hope there's no trial jimfields33 Dec 2021 #19
The prosecutor is quite determined. wnylib Dec 2021 #25
It doesn't matter Effete Snob Dec 2021 #29
Spread the mugshots far and wide... RockRaven Dec 2021 #4
The turd doesn't rateyes Dec 2021 #7
Kinda looks like Billy Bob Thornton there BradAllison Dec 2021 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Meadowoak Dec 2021 #9
Joking about prison rape is a garbage move. WhiskeyGrinder Dec 2021 #21
Thank you for this post!,!!!!! nt USALiberal Dec 2021 #37
Not funny. n/t ms liberty Dec 2021 #24
Where is his mother's mug shot? malaise Dec 2021 #10
Waiting for the press release where Trump pardons him pre-emptively. no_hypocrisy Dec 2021 #11
Future Republican congressional staffer. BlueNProud Dec 2021 #12
Has anyone else read Busterscruggs Dec 2021 #13
Yes malaise Dec 2021 #14
She probably thought that would be a brilliant disguise. llmart Dec 2021 #15
Yep. Both mugshots underpants Dec 2021 #18
The parents definitely deserve to be charged, but wnylib Dec 2021 #27
The parents, from what I've read, wouldn't take him home underpants Dec 2021 #28
If he was a girl with a short skirt, they'd send him home Effete Snob Dec 2021 #30
No I didn't know that. underpants Dec 2021 #31
.8 miles, door to door Effete Snob Dec 2021 #34
Our school policy is .75 and you are on the bus CrackityJones75 Dec 2021 #39
You are familiar with the rules of that school district? Effete Snob Dec 2021 #40
That's about 9 or 10 city blocks. underpants Dec 2021 #50
What about refusing to let him back wnylib Dec 2021 #32
School resource officer should have escorted all of them out of the building. Wingus Dingus Dec 2021 #36
Sounds like a good reason wnylib Dec 2021 #38
My reply isn't to your post CrackityJones75 Dec 2021 #41
"Revisionist?" Effete Snob Dec 2021 #43
No they didn't CrackityJones75 Dec 2021 #46
I cannot agree about the schools. wnylib Dec 2021 #44
Did you listen to the report on the child? CrackityJones75 Dec 2021 #45
Indicators of what with the boy? wnylib Dec 2021 #47
According to the interview I listened to yesterday CrackityJones75 Dec 2021 #48
Why would you believe that? Effete Snob Dec 2021 #42
Given why the parents were called to school, I wonder why the police Progressive Jones Dec 2021 #51
She's ugly too.. and looks like she Cha Dec 2021 #53
Apple Doesn't Fall Far From the Tree. MoonRiver Dec 2021 #17
Could be a face at any MAGA rally. Evil. kairos12 Dec 2021 #20
Looks like any Jan. 6 terrorist, VGNonly Dec 2021 #23
Is bed head the new hair style du jour or something? Wounded Bear Dec 2021 #22
So what's with the school counselor/staff? womanofthehills Dec 2021 #26
Bothsidesism? Whataboutism? Kaleva Dec 2021 #33
How is that question an example of either of those things? Effete Snob Dec 2021 #35
How do you define "dangerous"? Kaleva Dec 2021 #49
That's a question for a jury Effete Snob Dec 2021 #54
Thanks for your articulate response! Kaleva Dec 2021 #55
Ugly MF Cha Dec 2021 #52

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)
3. The jury will hear all about his futigive attempt to escape...
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:28 AM
Dec 2021

...and will not look kindly on him or his wife.

They can't answer to that.

And the parents being who they are may actually give the kid a defense that he otherwise would not have been available to him.

wnylib

(26,025 posts)
5. I'vr been thinking about that, too.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:46 AM
Dec 2021

The behavior of the parents has created a more sympathetic image of their son.

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)
6. Don't get me wrong, the kid is going down.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:11 AM
Dec 2021

But he'll have a defense unlike all these other mass shooters. We will see this go to trial.

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
16. Unlikely
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 09:38 AM
Dec 2021

I doubt there will be any trials.

The overwhelming majority of criminal cases do not go to trial.

 

jimfields33

(19,382 posts)
19. I hope there's no trial
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 09:59 AM
Dec 2021

The Rittenhouse trial was more then enough for all our lifetimes. I just don’t think we need to know every nock and cranny of these horrid people.

wnylib

(26,025 posts)
25. The prosecutor is quite determined.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 11:24 AM
Dec 2021

She has stated that he will be tried as an adult. And she has charged the parents. The only thing to stop trials now would be separate plea deals for Nathan and his parents.

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
29. It doesn't matter
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 11:44 AM
Dec 2021

Regardless of how determined a prosecutor might be, most criminal cases are disposed with a guilty plea.

Aside from that, she doesn’t decide whether he is competent to stand trial anyway.

Response to RandySF (Original post)

 

Busterscruggs

(448 posts)
13. Has anyone else read
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 08:20 AM
Dec 2021

Their letter to Trump? These 2 are as deep red as their little black hearts can get. Hopefully justice will be swift and severe

llmart

(17,624 posts)
15. She probably thought that would be a brilliant disguise.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 08:35 AM
Dec 2021

These two aren't exactly members of Mensa.

wnylib

(26,025 posts)
27. The parents definitely deserve to be charged, but
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 11:41 AM
Dec 2021

the school also has some responsibility in allowing him to return to class. Never should have happened.

In 1964, when a kid in my 9th grade math class set off a firecracker that startled the hell out of all of us, he was immediately removed from class. Don't know what happened to him, but he did not return to that school again.

underpants

(196,512 posts)
28. The parents, from what I've read, wouldn't take him home
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 11:43 AM
Dec 2021

They wanted him to go back to class. The school has to do one or the other - back to class or kick him out but make sure he has a way to get home.

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
30. If he was a girl with a short skirt, they'd send him home
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 11:49 AM
Dec 2021

I don’t know if you’ve looked at a map, but their house was within walking distance.
 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
34. .8 miles, door to door
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 12:07 PM
Dec 2021

If you look at Oxford MI on Google maps, there’s one street where you can’t access street view. That’s the street the Crumbleys lived on.
 

CrackityJones75

(2,403 posts)
39. Our school policy is .75 and you are on the bus
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 12:25 PM
Dec 2021

I know because we are .8 away.

They likely could not have made him walk home. Shame.

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
40. You are familiar with the rules of that school district?
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 12:27 PM
Dec 2021

I doubt they are nationally uniform.

However, they had sufficient cause for a 72 hour psych hold. There is transportation provided for that.

wnylib

(26,025 posts)
32. What about refusing to let him back
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 11:53 AM
Dec 2021

in class and calling social services if the parents refused to take him?

Somebody has to protect the other students in school when a seriously disturbed kid demonstrates in his behavior that he is a potential threat.

Wingus Dingus

(9,173 posts)
36. School resource officer should have escorted all of them out of the building.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 12:17 PM
Dec 2021

Mom is pretty good at lying and "not getting caught", probably convinced the staff there was no threat and they would comply. School staff probably had a bias to believe them, this being a white middle class boy who wasn't previously noted to be a troublemaker, with two white parents with jobs and a nice new car who came in looking fake-concerned.

wnylib

(26,025 posts)
38. Sounds like a good reason
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 12:21 PM
Dec 2021

for home schooling kids today to keep them alive through graduation.

 

CrackityJones75

(2,403 posts)
41. My reply isn't to your post
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 12:28 PM
Dec 2021

My reply isn’t to your post just replying because it is down the list.

There is a lit of revisionist looking backwards posting here about what the school should have done. School administrators are way overworked these days and I think it is too much to ask that we put it on them to stop these tragedies from happening. Legislators should start fucking legislating!!!!

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
43. "Revisionist?"
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 12:33 PM
Dec 2021

I’m not sure you know what that word means.

They knew the kid was not safe to be around other students.

Being overworked does not relieve them of their responsibilities, unfortunately.

wnylib

(26,025 posts)
44. I cannot agree about the schools.
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 12:57 PM
Dec 2021

They have a responsibility to every child (and adult) who is inside their building or on their premises. They are responsible for providing a safe learning atmosphere.

School shootings are not a new phenomenon. Every school should have policies in place for removing a potential threat from the premises. A kid who draws pictures of bullets, blood, a person with bullet holes, and writes that his life is useless, that he can't stop the thoughts, and adds, "help me" is a very serious threat to himself or to others. What more does it take to ring the alarm bells loud enough to act?

Since the parents refused to take him, they could have called social services.

That kid's drawings and notes were a literal plea for help that neither his parents nor the school gave him. 11 families besides the Crumbleys are now dealing with the consequences.

The school did not make Nathan into a child who could kill. The school did not provide him with a gun or with ammunition. But with knowledge of his fantasies and state of mind, they gave him access to victims. In a situation like the school was confronted with, the mass shooting might have been prevented if they had told the parents flat out that they could not keep a student in his mental state in school and they would contact social services to take him if the parents refused. Then investigate the parents for neglect.

 

CrackityJones75

(2,403 posts)
45. Did you listen to the report on the child?
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 01:28 PM
Dec 2021

They said that there were no indicators of this with the boy.

wnylib

(26,025 posts)
47. Indicators of what with the boy?
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 01:45 PM
Dec 2021

I've no idea what your point is.

The indicators that Nathan was in an unstable state of mind that presented a threat to himself or to others were quite clear and obvious.

If you are referring to what I posted about social services investigating the parents for neglect, I stated it as a consequence when the parents refused to acknowledge Nathan's troubled state of mind and take him from the school. I was not suggesting that they did not provide him with adequate food, clothing, and shelter. I was saying that there was good reason to question their competence in recognizing and dealing with an obvious mental health issue in their son.

 

CrackityJones75

(2,403 posts)
48. According to the interview I listened to yesterday
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 02:12 PM
Dec 2021

According to the interview I listened to yesterday there were no indicators that he was going to do this. No history of bullying. Whether or not that is true is one thing but that was the statement.

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
42. Why would you believe that?
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 12:30 PM
Dec 2021

Considering that most fatal accidents happen at home, what statistics make you believe that being home is safer?

Aside from fatalities, guess where most violent and sexual abuse of children happens.

Progressive Jones

(6,011 posts)
51. Given why the parents were called to school, I wonder why the police
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 05:02 PM
Dec 2021
weren't called before the parents were called.
The police should have already been there when the parents showed up.

Wounded Bear

(64,329 posts)
22. Is bed head the new hair style du jour or something?
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 10:32 AM
Dec 2021

Definitely seems to run in this family.

womanofthehills

(10,988 posts)
26. So what's with the school counselor/staff?
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 11:29 AM
Dec 2021

Thinking it was ok for a kid who wrote this to go back to his class. It was a very alarming note.

I

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
35. How is that question an example of either of those things?
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 12:12 PM
Dec 2021

Crumbley was a dangerous person. Schools have a responsibility to protect students from other students who may be dangerous.

If a student manifests indications that the student may be dangerous, then it is their job to remove that student from the environment.

To call that some form of responsibility shifting is absurd. That would be like an employer saying “yeah, I know your co-worker is abusive, but that’s on him.” No, we hold those in charge of workplaces, schools, and other facilities responsible for what they allow to occur within them.

Kaleva

(40,365 posts)
49. How do you define "dangerous"?
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 02:24 PM
Dec 2021

Your comment:

"If a student manifests indications that the student may be dangerous, then it is their job to remove that student from the environment."

Maybe if the school knew the kid had easy access to guns then his behavior in school may be an indication that the situation was bad and warranted his removal from the premises. Drawing pics and looking up ammo on the internet in of itself may be concerning but in of itself, not dangerous.

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
54. That's a question for a jury
Sat Dec 4, 2021, 06:35 PM
Dec 2021

It’s up to a jury to decide what is dangerous upon review of all relevant facts and circumstances. A much richer factual context will no doubt be the subject of comprehensive discovery.

There are some small pieces of the larger factual tableau, which do seem to raise issues. Certainly what was the exact subject of the discussion, and contemporaneous notes kept in the course thereof, as well as what red flags may or may not have been apparent, will be grist fir the mill of deciding (a) did the school staff have sufficient information such that (b) they knew or should have known that the teen was or was not an exceptional risk and (c) if so, were their actions appropriate within the exercise of ordinary standards of applicable professional judgment.

But, starting backwards from how things wound up, it may be difficult to establish a lack of liability. There’s enough to avoid a motion to dismiss.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»James Crumbley Mug Shot