Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New New Yorker Cover: Re: Debate. (Original Post) onehandle Oct 2012 OP
Just what Mitt needs: ProSense Oct 2012 #1
This is total disrespect in so many ways. Shocking in it's inference. cr8tvlde Oct 2012 #2
Is the New Yorker now required to be respectful? cthulu2016 Oct 2012 #3
What is your opinion? cr8tvlde Oct 2012 #5
The New Yorker has slammed the GOP many times. Why does the DU think things only work ONE way? Logical Oct 2012 #4
ah, but invisible Obama never said eff you, even after magical thyme Oct 2012 #6

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
1. Just what Mitt needs:
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 06:31 PM
Oct 2012

a reminder of Clint's chair debacle.

His surrogates are out trying to explain his current flip flop on the 47 percent comment.

Romney On 47 Percent: ‘I Said Something That’s Just Completely Wrong’
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021475193

The RW and Republicans' heads are exploding about the jobs data.

Jack Welch: ‘No Evidence’ Of BLS Conspiracy, But I Stand By BLS Conspiracy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021479700

The unemployment truthers are not helping Romney
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021479723

Bring back the chair!!!



 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
4. The New Yorker has slammed the GOP many times. Why does the DU think things only work ONE way?
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 06:55 PM
Oct 2012
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
6. ah, but invisible Obama never said eff you, even after
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 07:49 PM
Oct 2012

Romney tried to make him out to be a liar.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New New Yorker Cover: Re:...