Seeing in print in the @WSJ this list of Republican national security officials endorsing Biden...

[demmiblue]

Seeing in print in the @WSJ this list of Republican national security officials endorsing Biden is really something. This is basically every GOP luminary of the last 30 years, saying “enough” to Trump. Stunning, really.

Link to tweet

[SheltieLover]

1. I hope2 scoop sees this!

[dixiegrrrrl]

2. I was hoping for this.

We should be seeing more of the same now.

[MagickMuffin]

3. I counted 73

and counting(?) I hope!

[sheshe2]

4. Wow!

[cilla4progress]

5. I hope my Republican WSJ-subscribing friends

read this and change their minds.

Or at least get bad headaches from it!

[magicarpet]

6. That ain't a bus load of Camp Fire Girls,...

.... these are some serious anti-trDump heavy weights showing their sentiments in a very public way.

Profoundly anti-trDump.

Let's see more of this from more corners.

[orangecrush]

7. JEEZ

Amazing.

Kick!

[jaxexpat]

8. They represent the shoulder salad and the professional conservative politicians....

but since when does the contemporary republican electorate care about the actual personal commitment required for national security or even consider "professional conservative politicians" pronounceable words.

And how far does this particular voter definition incise the "independent" voter category, upon which each election win is dependent.

[Sloumeau]

9. Short version: Trump is a fool! Get him out of the White House! :) nt

[cstanleytech]

10. "Trump is a fool! Get him out of the White House before he kills another 160,000+ Americans!"

At least that is probably a bit closer to what they are trying to say.

[erronis]

11. That's why trumpf is posting US marshals at the voting places - has a list of these people

that won't be allowed to vote. Executive order: "White House Unamerican Kommittee" (WHUK)

[warmfeet]

12. Sane people vote for Biden/Harris.

Draw your own conclusions from what the previous statement implies.

[NNadir]

13. In a Rupert Murdoch rag no less. n/t.